• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解局限期同步放化疗:当前见解、局限性及我们中心的经验

Understanding LOT-CRT: Current Insights, Limitations, and Our Center's Experience.

作者信息

Leventopoulos Georgios, Nastouli Kassiani-Maria, Bozika Maria, Papastavrou Eleni, Apostolos Anastasios, Koros Rafail, Perperis Angelos, Koniari Ioanna, Vlassopoulou Niki, Chronopoulos Panagiotis, Travlos Christoforos K, Moulias Athanasios, Davlouros Periklis

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece.

First Department of Cardiology, Hippocration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 27;14(9):3025. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093025.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14093025
PMID:40364057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12072401/
Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular (BiV) pacing is the standard treatment for heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and electrical dyssynchrony. However, one in three patients remains a non-responder. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) could represent a more physiological alternative, but its effectiveness is limited in cases of atypical left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). Left Bundle Branch Pacing Optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) integrates LBBAP with coronary sinus (CS) lead pacing to improve electrical synchrony and clinical outcomes. This review evaluates the feasibility, advantages, disadvantages, and clinical outcomes of LOT-CRT. Additionally, we describe our center's experience and propose an evidence-based implantation algorithm. A review of published studies investigating LOT-CRT was conducted, comparing its effectiveness with BiV-CRT and LBBAP alone using QRS narrowing, LVEF improvement, left ventricular remodeling, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class changes and NT-proBNP levels. It was found that LOT-CRT outperforms BiV-CRT or LBBAP alone in selected populations, at the cost of higher clinical skills, longer procedural times, and specific device setups. Randomized trials are underway to further define its role in clinical practice.

摘要

使用双心室(BiV)起搏的心脏再同步治疗(CRT)是左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低且存在电不同步的心力衰竭(HF)患者的标准治疗方法。然而,三分之一的患者仍然没有反应。左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)可能是一种更符合生理的替代方法,但在非典型左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)或室内传导延迟(IVCD)的情况下其有效性有限。左束支起搏优化心脏再同步治疗(LOT-CRT)将LBBAP与冠状窦(CS)导联起搏相结合,以改善电同步性和临床结局。本综述评估了LOT-CRT的可行性、优点、缺点和临床结局。此外,我们描述了我们中心的经验并提出了一种基于证据的植入算法。对已发表的研究LOT-CRT的研究进行了综述,使用QRS波变窄、LVEF改善、左心室重塑、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级变化和NT-proBNP水平,将其有效性与单独的BiV-CRT和LBBAP进行比较。结果发现,在特定人群中,LOT-CRT的表现优于单独的BiV-CRT或LBBAP,但代价是需要更高的临床技能、更长的手术时间和特定的设备设置。正在进行随机试验以进一步确定其在临床实践中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/6c7ca42b26b9/jcm-14-03025-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/2f0f65d748a2/jcm-14-03025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/4023604e9a57/jcm-14-03025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/9589221f559e/jcm-14-03025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/c4408cb0268a/jcm-14-03025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/6c7ca42b26b9/jcm-14-03025-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/2f0f65d748a2/jcm-14-03025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/4023604e9a57/jcm-14-03025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/9589221f559e/jcm-14-03025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/c4408cb0268a/jcm-14-03025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/065f/12072401/6c7ca42b26b9/jcm-14-03025-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding LOT-CRT: Current Insights, Limitations, and Our Center's Experience.了解局限期同步放化疗:当前见解、局限性及我们中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 27;14(9):3025. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093025.
2
Left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT): Results from an international LBBAP collaborative study group.左束支优化心脏再同步治疗(LOT-CRT):来自国际 LBBAP 合作研究小组的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.057. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Electrical Resynchronization and Clinical Outcomes During Long-Term Follow-Up in Intraventricular Conduction Delay Patients Applied Left Bundle Branch Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.左束支区域起搏优化心脏再同步治疗在伴有室内传导延迟患者中的长期随访中对电同步和临床结果的影响。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;16(9):e011761. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011761. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
4
Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy): an evidence-based analysis.双心室起搏(心脏再同步治疗):基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(13):1-60. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
5
Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study.多中心心脏血流动力学评估 LOT-CRT 策略:联合左束支起搏和冠状静脉起搏增强心脏再同步化治疗的最佳时机是什么?:CSPOT 研究的主要结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov;17(11):e013059. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013059. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
6
Efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Select site - cohort study.心脏再同步治疗患者中左束支区域起搏与双心室起搏的疗效比较:选择部位队列研究
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jun;21(6):893-900. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.024. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
7
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.心脏再同步治疗的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
9
Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支区域起搏用于心脏再同步治疗适应证患者的可行性和疗效。
Europace. 2020 Dec 26;22(Suppl_2):ii54-ii60. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa271.
10
Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantation with shock lead placement in the left bundle branch area: a case report.心脏再同步化治疗除颤器植入术并将除颤电极置于左束支区域:一例病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Jul 4;8(7):ytae323. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae323. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) clinical consensus statement on indications for conduction system pacing, with special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC and endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)关于传导系统起搏指征的临床共识声明,欧洲心律协会对ESC有特别贡献,并得到亚太心律协会、加拿大心律协会、心律协会和拉丁美洲心律协会的认可。
Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf050.
2
Multicenter Hemodynamic Assessment of the LOT-CRT Strategy: When Does Combining Left Bundle Branch Pacing and Coronary Venous Pacing Enhance Resynchronization?: Primary Results of the CSPOT Study.多中心心脏血流动力学评估 LOT-CRT 策略:联合左束支起搏和冠状静脉起搏增强心脏再同步化治疗的最佳时机是什么?:CSPOT 研究的主要结果。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Nov;17(11):e013059. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013059. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
The Suboptimal QLV Ratio May Indicate the Need for a Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Upgrade.次优的QLV比值可能提示需要升级为左束支区域起搏优化的心脏再同步治疗。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 26;13(19):5742. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195742.
4
Effects of Heart Failure Therapies on Atrial Fibrillation: Biological and Clinical Perspectives.心力衰竭治疗对心房颤动的影响:生物学和临床视角
Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;13(7):806. doi: 10.3390/antiox13070806.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implantation with shock lead placement in the left bundle branch area: a case report.心脏再同步化治疗除颤器植入术并将除颤电极置于左束支区域:一例病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Jul 4;8(7):ytae323. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae323. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Left bundle branch block criteria in the 2021 ESC guidelines on CRT: a step back in identifying CRT candidates?2021年欧洲心脏病学会心脏再同步治疗指南中的左束支传导阻滞标准:在识别心脏再同步治疗候选者方面是一种倒退吗?
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug 26;25(9):e213-e215. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae164.
7
Comparisons of long-term clinical outcomes with left bundle branch pacing, left ventricular septal pacing, and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy.比较左束支起搏、左心室间隔起搏和双心室起搏用于心脏再同步治疗的长期临床结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2024 Aug;21(8):1342-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
8
Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Left Ventricular Septal Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.左束支起搏与左心室间隔部起搏与双心室起搏用于心脏再同步治疗。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb;10(2):295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
9
Septal scar as a barrier to left bundle branch area pacing.室间隔瘢痕作为左束支区域起搏的障碍。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1077-1084. doi: 10.1111/pace.14804. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
10
Electrical Resynchronization and Clinical Outcomes During Long-Term Follow-Up in Intraventricular Conduction Delay Patients Applied Left Bundle Branch Pacing-Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.左束支区域起搏优化心脏再同步治疗在伴有室内传导延迟患者中的长期随访中对电同步和临床结果的影响。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;16(9):e011761. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011761. Epub 2023 Aug 14.