Chen Lan, Jin Dingping, Gong Zhumei, Lu Liyun, Zhao Junlu, Xu Shuying, Yang Xiaoling, Zhang Yuping, Feng Xiuqin
Nursing Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Emergency Department, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 May 9;18:2629-2639. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S522541. eCollection 2025.
Water circulation cooling blankets are commonly used in heat stroke management, but their efficacy and safety remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to assess the cooling effect of the cooling blanket within the first 24 hours after emergency department admission in patients with heat stroke.
Retrospective data were collected from six hospitals. The primary outcomes included body temperature at 0.5 and 2 hours post-treatment and changes in temperature during these intervals. The cooling effect was assessed using logistic regression, generalized additive mixed models, and genetic and propensity score matching. Test effectiveness was evaluated based on the non-inferiority test formula.
A total of 191 patients were included, with 84 (44.0%) receiving cooling with the blanket. The mean cooling duration was 2 hours. Body temperatures at 0.5 hours were 39.80 ± 0.96 °C in the cooling blanket group versus 39.26 ± 0.94 °C in the non-cooling blanket group. At 2 hours, temperatures were 38.08 ± 1.00 °C and 37.84 ± 0.96 °C, respectively. No significant differences were found in body temperature at 0.5 hours (β, -0.19 [95% CI, -0.50, 0.12]; P = 0.242) or 2 hours (β, -0.24 [95% CI, -0.57, 0.09]; P = 0.161) between the cooling blanket and non-cooling blanket groups. Similarly, no significant differences in temperature changes at 0.5 or 2 hours were observed. After adjusting for propensity scores, no differences in temperature were found in the matching cohort. The non-inferiority criterion was met, with effectiveness scores of 1.000 at 0.5 hours and 0.998 at 2 hours.
The cooling blanket demonstrated no significant temperature reduction advantage compared to the non-cooling blanket group. High-quality randomized controlled trials remain necessary to further evaluate its therapeutic role in heat stroke management.
水循环冷却毯常用于中暑治疗,但其疗效和安全性仍研究不足。本研究旨在评估冷却毯对中暑患者急诊科入院后最初24小时内的降温效果。
收集了6家医院的回顾性数据。主要结局包括治疗后0.5小时和2小时的体温以及这些时间段内的体温变化。使用逻辑回归、广义相加混合模型以及遗传和倾向评分匹配法评估降温效果。基于非劣效性检验公式评估检验效能。
共纳入191例患者,其中84例(44.0%)接受了冷却毯降温。平均降温持续时间为2小时。冷却毯组0.5小时时体温为39.80±0.96℃,非冷却毯组为39.26±0.94℃。2小时时,体温分别为38.08±1.00℃和37.84±0.96℃。冷却毯组和非冷却毯组在0.5小时(β,-0.19[95%CI,-0.50,0.12];P = 0.242)或2小时(β,-0.24[95%CI,-0.57,0.09];P = 0.161)时的体温无显著差异。同样,在0.5小时或2小时时的体温变化也无显著差异。在调整倾向评分后,匹配队列中的体温无差异。满足非劣效性标准,0.5小时时的效能评分为1.000,2小时时为0.998。
与非冷却毯组相比,冷却毯未显示出显著的降温优势。仍需要高质量的随机对照试验来进一步评估其在中暑治疗中的治疗作用。