• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同开展一项关于湿疹患者洗澡频率的随机对照试验:公民科学方法的描述。

Co-producing a randomized controlled trial on the frequency of bathing in eczema: description of a citizen science approach.

作者信息

Baker Arabella, Bonsu Natalie, Howells Laura, Muller Ingrid, Mitchell Eleanor J, Cowdell Fiona, Davies Firoza, Eddis-Finbow Mars, Montgomery Alan, Patel Devin, Putrym Goldie, Ridd Matthew J, Santer Miriam, Roberts Amanda, Thomas Kim S

机构信息

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Faculty of Health Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Skin Health Dis. 2025 Apr 16;5(2):130-139. doi: 10.1093/skinhd/vzaf005. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1093/skinhd/vzaf005
PMID:40365260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12068486/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eczema is a prevalent, chronic, itchy skin condition that often persists into adulthood and significantly affects the quality of life of patients and their families. With no cure available at present, effective management is crucial. Although important patient priorities related to eczema self-management have been identified, they are rarely the focus of large, high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To outline the methodology of using a citizen science approach to co-produce an online RCT on the frequency of bathing, to support the self-management of eczema.

METHODS

The co-production of the trial with patients living with eczema involved research prioritization, intervention development and trial design, all carried out through a series of online meetings and surveys.

RESULTS

Co-producing the trial took 9 months, consisting of 13 online meetings (5 to prioritize the topic, 4 to develop the intervention and 4 to design the trial), requiring 39 h of time commitment from members of the public ( = 12) with a total spending of £5440 on reimbursements. A prioritization survey ( = 120) identified the most popular research question as how often to bath/shower, receiving 49% of votes. Following an iterative refinement among the co-production group members, the trial research question was formulated. The intervention development survey ( = 169) established current bathing practices and interest in participating in the trial. Survey results informed the development of study materials and influenced decisions related to trial design. The finalized study materials included key information about the target behaviour (weekly bathing or daily bathing), frequently asked questions and common concerns. The trial design co-production group determined the eligibility criteria, defined the intervention and comparator, selected the outcome measures, determined the study duration and developed the recruitment strategy. The Eczema Bathing Study opened to recruitment on 29 January 2024 and over 50% of the target sample size of 390 have been recruited within the first 2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper provides a useful model for co-producing RCTs with members of the public. It describes the key stages of trial development (prioritization, intervention development, trial design) and contains information on the time and resources required to design trials using this approach.

摘要

背景

湿疹是一种常见的慢性瘙痒性皮肤病,常持续至成年期,严重影响患者及其家人的生活质量。目前尚无治愈方法,有效管理至关重要。虽然已确定了与湿疹自我管理相关的重要患者优先事项,但它们很少成为大型高质量随机对照试验(RCT)的重点。

目的

概述采用公民科学方法共同开展一项关于洗澡频率的在线随机对照试验的方法,以支持湿疹的自我管理。

方法

与湿疹患者共同开展该试验涉及研究优先级确定、干预措施制定和试验设计,所有这些均通过一系列在线会议和调查进行。

结果

共同开展该试验耗时9个月,包括13次在线会议(5次确定主题优先级、4次制定干预措施、4次设计试验),需要公众成员(n = 12)投入39小时的时间,报销费用总计5440英镑。一项优先级调查(n = 120)确定最受欢迎的研究问题是洗澡/淋浴的频率,获得49%的选票。在共同生产小组成员之间进行反复完善后,制定了试验研究问题。干预措施制定调查(n = 169)确定了当前的洗澡习惯以及参与试验的兴趣。调查结果为研究材料的开发提供了信息,并影响了与试验设计相关的决策。最终确定的研究材料包括关于目标行为(每周洗澡或每天洗澡)的关键信息、常见问题和普遍关注的问题。试验设计共同生产小组确定了纳入标准,定义了干预措施和对照,选择了结局指标,确定了研究持续时间并制定了招募策略。湿疹洗澡研究于2024年1月29日开始招募,在头两个月内已招募到目标样本量390人的50%以上。

结论

本文为与公众共同开展随机对照试验提供了一个有用的模型。它描述了试验开发的关键阶段(优先级确定、干预措施开发、试验设计),并包含了使用这种方法设计试验所需的时间和资源信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe3/12068486/5e547d1ca9ab/vzaf005f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe3/12068486/1f0ff2dcfb8b/vzaf005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe3/12068486/5e547d1ca9ab/vzaf005f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe3/12068486/1f0ff2dcfb8b/vzaf005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe3/12068486/5e547d1ca9ab/vzaf005f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-producing a randomized controlled trial on the frequency of bathing in eczema: description of a citizen science approach.共同开展一项关于湿疹患者洗澡频率的随机对照试验:公民科学方法的描述。
Skin Health Dis. 2025 Apr 16;5(2):130-139. doi: 10.1093/skinhd/vzaf005. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The Eczema Bathing Study: Weekly versus daily bathing for people with eczema? Protocol of an online, randomised controlled trial.湿疹沐浴研究:湿疹患者每周沐浴与每日沐浴对比?一项在线随机对照试验方案
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Jan 17;4:63. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13659.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the Remote Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的远程早期检测的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05643-5.
6
Development of an intervention for reducing infant bathing frequency.减少婴儿洗澡频率干预措施的制定。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0298335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298335. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
8
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
9
Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.婴幼儿皮肤护理干预措施预防特应性皮炎和食物过敏。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 5;2(2):CD013534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013534.pub2.
10
Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.婴幼儿皮肤护理干预措施预防特应性皮炎和食物过敏。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD013534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013534.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Democratising the design and delivery of large-scale randomised, controlled clinical trials in primary care: A personal view.民主化大型随机对照临床试验在初级保健中的设计和实施:个人观点。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2293702. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2023.2293702. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
Co-production of a feasibility trial of pacing interventions for Long COVID.长新冠起搏干预可行性试验的联合开展
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00429-2.
3
Long COVID Citizen Scientists: Developing a Needs-Based Research Agenda by Persons Affected by Long COVID.
长新冠公民科学家:受长新冠影响人群制定基于需求的研究议程。
Patient. 2022 Sep;15(5):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00579-7. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
4
What Matters to Whom: Patient and Public Involvement in Research.什么对谁重要:患者和公众参与研究。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;65(2):268-276. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000694. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
The People's Trial: supporting the public's understanding of randomised trials.人民审判:支持公众对随机试验的理解。
Trials. 2022 Mar 9;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1.
6
Recommendations for emollients, bathing and topical corticosteroids for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review of guidelines.用于治疗特应性皮炎的润肤剂、沐浴和外用皮质类固醇的推荐:指南的系统评价
Eur J Dermatol. 2022 Feb 1;32(1):113-123. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2022.4197.
7
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
8
Views and experiences of managing eczema: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.管理湿疹的观点和经验:定性研究的系统评价和主题综合。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Apr;184(4):627-637. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19299. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
9
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
10
Maximizing the promise of citizen science to advance health and prevent disease.最大化公民科学在促进健康和预防疾病方面的潜力。
Prev Med. 2019 Feb;119:44-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 26.