Zhang Jianjun, Chen Ming, Gao Yongsheng, Liu Jinqi, Li Zengjun, Wang Dongyang
Department of Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Department of Endoscopy, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 30;12:1509628. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1509628. eCollection 2025.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is important for diagnosing and staging esophageal cancer. However, substantial variability in the diagnostic and staging accuracy of EUS, especially in early-stage cancers, affects patients' treatment choices and quality of life.
To explore whether conventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS-C) combined with submucosal saline injection (EUS-SSI) improves diagnostic accuracy in preoperative T1a and T1b staging in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC).
Patients with SESCC first underwent EUS-C. Then, they received SSI and underwent a repeat EUS. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-C and EUS-SSI was evaluated based on the final postoperative pathology results.
A total of 92 patients with endoscopically diagnosed SESCC were included in the study. Postoperative pathology confirmed superficial SESCC in all patients (T1a stage, = 77; T1b stage, = 15). EUS-C correctly identified 54 of 77 patients with T1a cancer and nine of 15 patients with T1b cancer, whereas EUS-SSI identified 68 of 77 patients with T1a cancer and 10 of 15 patients with T1b cancer. EUS-SSI was more accurate than EUS-C in diagnosing T1a and T1b stage SESCC (84.8 and 68.5%, respectively).
EUS-SSI differentiates between T1a and T1b stages of superficial SESCC with better diagnostic accuracy than EUS-C, thereby reducing the rate of over-staging.
内镜超声(EUS)对食管癌的诊断和分期很重要。然而,EUS诊断和分期准确性存在很大差异,尤其是在早期癌症中,这会影响患者的治疗选择和生活质量。
探讨传统内镜超声检查(EUS-C)联合黏膜下注射生理盐水(EUS-SSI)是否能提高浅表食管鳞状细胞癌(SESCC)术前T1a和T1b分期的诊断准确性。
SESCC患者首先接受EUS-C检查。然后,他们接受SSI并再次进行EUS检查。根据最终术后病理结果评估EUS-C和EUS-SSI的诊断准确性。
共有92例经内镜诊断为SESCC的患者纳入研究。术后病理证实所有患者均为浅表SESCC(T1a期,=77例;T1b期,=15例)。EUS-C正确识别了77例T1a期癌症患者中的54例和15例T1b期癌症患者中的9例,而EUS-SSI识别了77例T1a期癌症患者中的68例和15例T1b期癌症患者中的10例。在诊断T1a和T1b期SESCC方面,EUS-SSI比EUS-C更准确(分别为84.8%和68.5%)。
EUS-SSI在区分浅表SESCC的T1a和T1b期方面比EUS-C具有更高的诊断准确性,从而降低了过度分期的发生率。