Liu Hao, Yan Wei, Li Jinsong, Yan Dezhi, Luo Di
The First College of Clinical Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Orthopedic Joint, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 30;16:1483669. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1483669. eCollection 2025.
Anakinra and canakinumab are two FDA-approved IL-1 blockers indicated for the treatment of multiple autoinflammatory diseases, yet their safety has not been comprehensively analyzed. We aimed to assess the safety signals associated with anakinra and canakinumab by conducting a pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
Adverse reaction data spanning from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 was downloaded from the FAERS database. A disproportionality analysis utilizing various methods, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM), was conducted.
Anakinra and canakinumab were identified as the primary suspect drugs for adverse events (AEs) in 7,544 and 8,044 reports, respectively. The most commonly reported SOCs for both drugs were general disorders and administration site conditions. Subgroup analyses indicated that the most commonly reported SOC signals among health professionals and non-health professionals remained consistent across both medications. At the preferred term (PT) level, consistent with the drug labeling, the common AEs for anakinra and canakinumab included injection site reactions (ISRs) and infections. Further analysis revealed a higher frequency of ISRs with anakinra, including injection site pain and erythema. In contrast, canakinumab was associated with more gastrointestinal disorders (abdominal pain, mouth ulceration, and inflammatory bowel disease) and respiratory disorders (cough, oropharyngeal pain, and rhinorrhea); these conditions predominantly occurred among minors. Notably, no significant safety signals related to tuberculosis infection or reactivation were observed, and the frequency of AEs related to hepatic injury and malignancy was low.
This study confirms the favorable safety profiles of anakinra and canakinumab, offering critical insights into rational drug usage and safety regulations.
阿那白滞素和卡那单抗是两种经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗多种自身炎症性疾病的白细胞介素-1阻滞剂,但其安全性尚未得到全面分析。我们旨在通过使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库进行药物警戒分析,评估与阿那白滞素和卡那单抗相关的安全信号。
从FAERS数据库下载了2004年第一季度至2023年第四季度的不良反应数据。采用多种方法进行不成比例分析,包括报告比值比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和经验贝叶斯几何均值(EBGM)。
阿那白滞素和卡那单抗分别在7544份和8044份报告中被确定为不良事件(AE)的主要可疑药物。两种药物最常报告的系统器官分类(SOC)是全身性疾病和给药部位状况。亚组分析表明,卫生专业人员和非卫生专业人员中最常报告的SOC信号在两种药物中保持一致。在首选术语(PT)水平上,与药品标签一致,阿那白滞素和卡那单抗常见的AE包括注射部位反应(ISR)和感染。进一步分析显示,阿那白滞素的ISR频率更高,包括注射部位疼痛和红斑。相比之下,卡那单抗与更多的胃肠道疾病(腹痛、口腔溃疡和炎症性肠病)和呼吸系统疾病(咳嗽、口咽痛和鼻溢)相关;这些情况主要发生在未成年人中。值得注意的是,未观察到与结核感染或再激活相关的显著安全信号,且与肝损伤和恶性肿瘤相关的AE频率较低。
本研究证实了阿那白滞素和卡那单抗良好的安全性,为合理用药和安全监管提供了关键见解。