Wöhrstein Sofia, Matuz Tamara, Rötzer Lilli, Karnath Hans-Otto
Center of Neurology, Division of Neuropsychology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Eur J Neurol. 2025 May;32(5):e70195. doi: 10.1111/ene.70195.
After a COVID-19 infection, some patients experience long-term consequences known as Post-Covid Syndrome, which often includes cognitive impairment. We investigated the congruence between subjectively experienced and objectively measured cognitive deficits after a COVID-19 infection in an unselected, successively admitted cohort of 46 patients reporting subjective cognitive complaints (SCC).
We employed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to assess objective cognitive impairment across various cognitive domains. Three different cut-off criteria were applied, commonly used in the literature to define objective neurocognitive disorder (NCD).
We observed a notably low congruence between SCC and NCD in Post-Covid Syndrome, regardless of the cut-off criterion. Depending on the cognitive domain, only 4% to maximally 40% of the SCC could be objectified.
One possible explanation for this discrepancy could be the high rate of depressive symptoms observed in the group of patients studied, which may negatively influence the perception of one's cognitive abilities. These findings emphasize the need for careful evaluation of SCC in Post-Covid Syndrome and suggest that treating depressive symptoms may also alleviate some of the perceived cognitive deficits.
感染新冠病毒后,部分患者会出现被称为新冠后综合征的长期后果,其中常包括认知障碍。我们在一个未经过挑选、连续收治的46例报告主观认知主诉(SCC)的患者队列中,调查了新冠病毒感染后主观体验到的认知缺陷与客观测量的认知缺陷之间的一致性。
我们采用一套全面的神经心理测试组合,以评估各个认知领域的客观认知障碍。应用了三种不同的截断标准,这些标准在文献中常用于定义客观神经认知障碍(NCD)。
无论采用何种截断标准,我们都观察到新冠后综合征中SCC与NCD之间的一致性极低。根据认知领域的不同,只有4%至最多40%的SCC能够被客观化。
这种差异的一种可能解释是,在我们研究的患者群体中观察到的抑郁症状发生率较高,这可能会对个体认知能力的感知产生负面影响。这些发现强调了在新冠后综合征中对SCC进行仔细评估的必要性,并表明治疗抑郁症状可能也会减轻一些感知到的认知缺陷。