Ongaro G, Hamilton J G, Groner V, Hay J L, Calvello M, Oliveri S, Bonanni B, Feroce I, Pravettoni G
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Psychooncology. 2025 May;34(5):e70160. doi: 10.1002/pon.70160.
Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes significantly elevate risks of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Clinical guidelines recommend cascade screening (CS) to identify at-risk family members and advance genetically targeted disease prevention. However, despite the benefits of CS, testing uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among male first-degree relatives (FDRs) of female BRCA1/2 carriers.
Little is known about factors that hinder or enhance the implementation of CS in at-risk men in BRCA-positive families. This qualitative study explored multifaceted barriers and promoting factors influencing CS in 11 untested male FDRs.
Participants engaged in semi-structured interviews exploring their experiences and perspectives regarding CS uptake. Thematic analysis, guided by the Health Action Process Approach, revealed a complex interplay of barriers and promoting factors at individual, interpersonal, provider, and environmental levels.
Key barriers included limited awareness and communication, inaccurate knowledge regarding genetic testing, logistical constraints, and concerns regarding potential psychological outcomes. Potential promoting factors encompassed factors such as men's stage of life, actionability of genetic testing results, perceived benefit of prevention, familial cohesion, and provider direct recommendations.
These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the factors shaping CS uptake within BRCA-positive families and hold implications for targeted interventions to enhance CS uptake and improve the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Gender-specific education and public awareness campaigns are crucial, highlighting male cancer risk and surveillance strategies. Exploring alternative delivery methods, such as direct provider engagement with at-risk males, can address challenges of low CS uptake, moving beyond traditional patient-mediated approaches.
BRCA1/2基因的致病性变异会显著增加患乳腺癌、卵巢癌、前列腺癌和胰腺癌的风险。临床指南建议进行级联筛查(CS),以识别有风险的家庭成员并推进基因靶向疾病预防。然而,尽管级联筛查有诸多益处,但检测的接受度仍不理想,尤其是在女性BRCA1/2基因携带者的男性一级亲属(FDRs)中。
对于阻碍或促进BRCA阳性家庭中高危男性实施级联筛查的因素,人们了解甚少。这项定性研究探讨了影响11名未接受检测的男性一级亲属进行级联筛查的多方面障碍和促进因素。
参与者参与了半结构化访谈,探讨他们对接受级联筛查的经历和看法。在健康行动过程方法的指导下进行主题分析,揭示了个体、人际、医疗服务提供者和环境层面障碍与促进因素的复杂相互作用。
主要障碍包括认知和沟通有限、对基因检测的知识不准确、后勤限制以及对潜在心理结果的担忧。潜在的促进因素包括男性的生活阶段、基因检测结果的可操作性、预防的感知益处、家庭凝聚力以及医疗服务提供者的直接建议等因素。
这些发现有助于更深入地理解BRCA阳性家庭中级联筛查接受度的影响因素,并对有针对性的干预措施具有启示意义,以提高级联筛查的接受度并改善遗传性癌症综合征的管理。针对性别的教育和公众意识运动至关重要,突出男性癌症风险和监测策略。探索替代的实施方法,如医疗服务提供者直接与高危男性接触,可以解决级联筛查接受度低的挑战,超越传统的患者介导方法。