Lämmer Paulina, Oomkens Dorien, Stobernack Tim, Duijvestein Marjolijn
International Business School Tuttlingen, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Department of Gasteroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Endosc Int Open. 2025 May 12;13:a25706599. doi: 10.1055/a-2570-6599. eCollection 2025.
Gastroenterology is a specialty that has evolved rapidly over time, especially in terms of advancements in endoscopic procedures. However, these advancements also present challenges, given the substantial resource demands associated with endoscopy procedures. Numerous actions could be taken to develop a resilient healthcare system that consumes as few resources as possible, but recommendations are needed to prioritize which processes could be improved. We aimed to evaluate the environmental footprint of a colonoscopy procedure, and to identify the main contributing impact process categories.
A single-center observational study was conducted at a Dutch university hospital. No clinical patient data were collected, but the colonoscopy procedure was studied. Data were collected during 13 colonoscopies. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to calculate environmental impact.
Damage to human health from one colonoscopy was 11.3·10 disability-adjusted life-years, equivalent to 1 hour. A single colonoscopy resulted in emission of 56.4 kg of CO -equivalent (CO eq), equal to driving a car for 255 km or 55 days of emissions for an average European household. Transportation of patients and staff (76.5%) and disposables (13.5%) were the greatest contributors to damage to human health.
Among the 13 colonoscopies studied, the environmental impact was mainly attributable to transportation of patients and staff, and disposables. Therefore, raising awareness about the impact of transportation by car, and reducing resource consumption, particularly of disposable products, should be prioritized. Implementing alternatives to colonoscopy, such as intestinal ultrasound, could reduce the environmental footprint of the healthcare system.
胃肠病学是一个随着时间迅速发展的专业领域,尤其是在内镜检查程序的进展方面。然而,鉴于与内镜检查程序相关的大量资源需求,这些进展也带来了挑战。可以采取许多行动来建立一个尽可能少消耗资源的有弹性的医疗保健系统,但需要有建议来确定哪些流程可以优先改进。我们旨在评估结肠镜检查程序的环境足迹,并确定主要的影响过程类别。
在一家荷兰大学医院进行了一项单中心观察性研究。未收集临床患者数据,而是对结肠镜检查程序进行了研究。在13次结肠镜检查过程中收集了数据。使用生命周期评估(LCA)来计算环境影响。
一次结肠镜检查对人类健康造成的损害为11.3·10残疾调整生命年,相当于1小时。一次结肠镜检查导致排放56.4千克二氧化碳当量(CO₂eq),相当于一辆汽车行驶255公里或一个欧洲普通家庭55天的排放量。患者和工作人员的交通(76.5%)以及一次性用品(13.5%)是对人类健康造成损害的最大因素。
在所研究的13次结肠镜检查中,环境影响主要归因于患者和工作人员的交通以及一次性用品。因此,应优先提高对汽车交通影响的认识,并减少资源消耗,特别是一次性产品的消耗。实施结肠镜检查的替代方法,如肠道超声,可减少医疗保健系统的环境足迹。