用于指导物质使用障碍识别公平性的孕产妇毒理学检测政策的内容分析
Content Analysis of Maternal Toxicology Testing Policies to Inform Equity in Substance Use Disorder Identification.
作者信息
Habersham Leah L, Choi Sugy, Gelband Michelle, Wilcox Wendy, Bianco Angela, Bernstein Peter S, Taylor Kima J, Mohamed Nihal E
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
出版信息
Matern Child Health J. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04104-8.
OBJECTIVE
Analyze existing hospital-level policies in New York City (NYC) regarding substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs) during the perinatal period to provide a comprehensive guide for hospital-level policy development, ensuring equitable maternal screening for substance use and SUDs.
METHODS
Maternal toxicology policies were collected from eight NYC health systems between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2022. One policy focused exclusively on neonate toxicology testing and thus was excluded. The remaining seven policies were de-identified and underwent a qualitative thematic content analysis using the Health Equity Impact Assessment framework. Two researchers conducted the thematic analysis, and two others reviewed identified themes for distinctions between policies.
RESULTS
Seven hospital-level policies identified four distinct policy approaches (Types A, B, C, and D). The policies varied in their approach to prenatal substance use and SUD identification, highlighting gaps in knowledge and lack of standard guidelines. The different approaches involved combinations of standardized screening tools, toxicology tests, social service referrals, and patient consent procedures, among others. Researchers found that some policies may inadvertently reinforce stigma and bias due to a focus on high-risk characteristics not necessarily indicative of substance use or SUDs.
CONCLUSION
Multidisciplinary-informed evidence-based guidelines are needed to address substance use and SUDs during pregnancy. Our findings support the integration of evidence-based screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) into policies, and discourage sole reliance on toxicology tests for SUD identification. The study's findings can potentially guide the development of equitable and clinically useful maternal substance use and SUD policies, thereby improving dyad outcomes.
目的
分析纽约市(NYC)现有医院层面关于围产期物质使用和物质使用障碍(SUDs)的政策,为医院层面的政策制定提供全面指南,确保对物质使用和SUDs进行公平的孕产妇筛查。
方法
于2021年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间从纽约市八个卫生系统收集孕产妇毒理学政策。有一项政策专门关注新生儿毒理学检测,因此被排除。其余七项政策进行了去识别处理,并使用健康公平影响评估框架进行了定性主题内容分析。两名研究人员进行了主题分析,另外两名研究人员对确定的主题进行了审查,以区分不同政策。
结果
七项医院层面的政策确定了四种不同的政策方法(A、B、C和D类)。这些政策在产前物质使用和SUDs识别方法上各不相同,突出了知识差距和缺乏标准指南的问题。不同的方法涉及标准化筛查工具、毒理学检测、社会服务转诊和患者同意程序等的组合。研究人员发现,一些政策可能会因关注不一定表明物质使用或SUDs的高风险特征而无意中强化耻辱感和偏见。
结论
需要多学科知情的循证指南来解决孕期的物质使用和SUDs问题。我们的研究结果支持将循证筛查、简短干预和转诊治疗(SBIRT)纳入政策,并不鼓励单纯依赖毒理学检测来识别SUDs。该研究结果可能会指导制定公平且具有临床实用性的孕产妇物质使用和SUDs政策,从而改善母婴结局。