Pourian Jessica, Kapadia Jhanavi, Li Melinda, Has Phinnara, Rafferty Jason, Loiselle Syd, Donaldson Abigail, Allen Emily B, Rusley Jack C
Department of Pediatrics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Jul;77(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.03.006. Epub 2025 May 17.
Assessing sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) is a key element in delivering high quality health care to adolescents and young adults (AYAs). However, AYA perspectives on SOGI data collection remain understudied. Therefore, we aimed to assess perceived importance of and comfort with SOGI data collection.
AYA attending outpatient visits completed an anonymous survey. We assessed importance (Likert scale: 5 = strongly disagree to 1 = strongly agree) and comfort with various collection methods (yes/no), as well as willingness to share name and/or pronouns in the electronic health record (EHR) (yes/no). AYA were classified as transgender and gender diverse (TGD) versus cisgender; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, other versus heterosexual. Mean scores were calculated and t-tests used to compare importance across groups; Fisher's exact tests were used to compare comfort and EHR preferences across groups.
Of 260 AYA ages 10 to 26, 50% were TGD and 52% were lesbian, gay, bisexual, other. The mean importance of gender identity among all AYA was 3.9, and TGD had higher ratings than cisgender AYA (4.4 vs. 3.6, p < .001). There were no differences between cisgender and TGD AYA with respect to sexual orientationimportance (3.6 vs. 3.3, p = .08). Ninety-six percent of AYA were comfortable with one or more methods of SOGI collection. Nearly all (96%) TGD youth were willing to share both their name and pronouns in the EHR.
Most AYA consider SOGI collection important and are comfortable being asked in clinic. Nearly all TGD youth preferred sharing both their name and pronouns in the EHR.
评估性取向和性别认同(SOGI)是为青少年和青年成年人(AYA)提供高质量医疗服务的关键要素。然而,AYA对SOGI数据收集的看法仍未得到充分研究。因此,我们旨在评估SOGI数据收集的感知重要性和舒适度。
参加门诊就诊的AYA完成了一项匿名调查。我们评估了重要性(李克特量表:5 = 强烈不同意至1 = 强烈同意)以及对各种收集方法的舒适度(是/否),以及在电子健康记录(EHR)中分享姓名和/或代词的意愿(是/否)。AYA被分为跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)与顺性别;以及女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、其他与异性恋。计算平均得分,并使用t检验比较各组之间的重要性;使用费舍尔精确检验比较各组之间的舒适度和EHR偏好。
在260名年龄在10至26岁的AYA中,50%为TGD,52%为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、其他。所有AYA中性别认同的平均重要性为3.9,TGD的评分高于顺性别AYA(4.4对3.6,p < .001)。顺性别和TGD AYA在性取向重要性方面没有差异(3.6对3.3,p = .08)。96%的AYA对一种或多种SOGI收集方法感到舒适。几乎所有(96%)的TGD青年都愿意在EHR中分享他们的姓名和代词。
大多数AYA认为SOGI收集很重要,并且在诊所被询问时感到舒适。几乎所有TGD青年都更喜欢在EHR中分享他们的姓名和代词。