Berhe Fekadeselassie, Belachew Tefera, Hassen Kalkidan
College of Medicine and Health Sciences School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Jimma University, Arba Minch University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
BMC Surg. 2025 May 19;25(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02946-1.
Surgical site infections (SSI) are a major concern due to their contributions to morbidity, economic loss, and death among individuals who underwent operations in healthcare institutions. To decrease this infection, various pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been devised and implemented for major surgery patients. Pharmacological interventions include the provision of antibiotic prophylaxis and antiseptic agents, whereas non-pharmacological interventions encompass programmatic interventions such as protocols, policies, quality improvement initiatives, training, and education that are given at the institutional level. However, the effect of particularly non-pharmacological interventions on the reduction has not been comprehensively evaluated for over a decade. This systematic review attempts to synthesize a piece of evidence on the effect of non-pharmacological intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa on minimizing SSI and enhancing health outcomes.
Databases including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, AJOL, Hinari, search platforms, and open-access repositories were accessed. Two investigators conducted a literature selection process, and the quality of selected articles was assessed using a JBI quality evaluation checklist.
A total of 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Three main intervention categories were identified, which focused on improving adherence to protocol, policy change or induction, and delivery of multimodal strategies. These interventions led to a reduction in SSI rates in varying degrees (15% to 95%). Multimodal interventions are the most widely implemented and comprehensive approaches that integrate multiple evidence-based practices, which have demonstrated a substantial reduction of SSI in different surgical populations. The rates of improvement with these interventions were influenced by intervention type, patient characteristics, surgical urgency, healthcare setting, follow-up time, and criteria for measuring the outcomes that may influence the SSI rates.
Interventions focusing on policy, protocol, and multimodal strategies can effectively reduce SSI rates, with the latter being the most effective. Patient and clinical characteristics, along with the healthcare setting, were influential factors affecting the interventions' impact on SSI. This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO, in the number CRD42024524963.
手术部位感染(SSI)是一个主要问题,因为它会导致在医疗机构接受手术的患者出现发病、经济损失和死亡。为了减少这种感染,已针对大手术患者设计并实施了各种药理学和非药理学干预措施。药理学干预措施包括提供抗生素预防和防腐剂,而非药理学干预措施则包括机构层面实施的程序性干预措施,如方案、政策、质量改进举措、培训和教育。然而,特别是非药理学干预措施对减少感染的效果在十多年来一直未得到全面评估。本系统评价试图综合关于撒哈拉以南非洲非药理学干预措施对最小化手术部位感染及改善健康结局效果的证据。
检索了包括MEDLINE、谷歌学术、考克兰图书馆、AJOL、Hinari、搜索平台和开放获取知识库在内的数据库。两名研究人员进行了文献筛选过程,并使用JBI质量评估清单对所选文章的质量进行了评估。
共分析了11项符合纳入标准的研究。确定了三个主要干预类别,其重点是提高对方案的依从性、政策改变或引入以及多模式策略的实施。这些干预措施在不同程度上(15%至95%)降低了手术部位感染率。多模式干预是实施最广泛且全面的方法,它整合了多种基于证据的实践,已证明在不同手术人群中可大幅降低手术部位感染率。这些干预措施的改善率受干预类型、患者特征、手术紧迫性、医疗环境、随访时间以及可能影响手术部位感染率的结局测量标准影响。
侧重于政策、方案和多模式策略的干预措施可有效降低手术部位感染率,其中多模式策略最为有效。患者和临床特征以及医疗环境是影响干预措施对手术部位感染影响的因素。本系统评价已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42024524963。