文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

作者信息

Wu Qiuji, Qin Yi, Li Qiu

机构信息

Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 May 2;13:1349645. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1349645. eCollection 2025.


DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1349645
PMID:40385627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12081414/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab has recently demonstrated improved prognosis in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not eligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen, as observed in a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab for the treatment of NSCLC from the perspective of payers in both developed and developing countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to simulate treatment scenarios involving atezolizumab or chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with NSCLC. The model estimated the transition probabilities, health care costs, and health utilities base on the risk of disease progression, survival, and toxicity using data from IPSOS clinical trials, relevant literature, and publicly available databases. A price simulation was conducted to guide the pricing strategy at the specified willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model's response to uncertainty. RESULTS: Among patients with NSCLC who are not suitable for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen, the use of atezolizumab led to an incremental gain of 0.35 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to chemotherapy. The ICER for atezolizumab compared to chemotherapy was calculated at $220400.53 per QALY in the US and $101874.61 per QALY in China. The price simulation results indicated that atezolizumab was favored in the US when the price was less than $371.28/60 mg and $474.92/60 mg at the WTP thresholds of $100,000 and $150,000, respectively; it was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $36023.71when the price was about 40% of the current price in China. Sensitivity analysis revealed that variables such as the price of atezolizumab and utilities influenced the r model's outcomes, although these factors did not significantly alter the overall conclusion. CONCLUSION: Atezolizumab was not considered cost-effective at the WTP thresholds of $150,000 per QALY in the US and $36,024 per QALY in China for patients with advanced NSCLC who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b8/12081414/8ed474fdd8b4/fpubh-13-1349645-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b8/12081414/324210734b2d/fpubh-13-1349645-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b8/12081414/0d9b87514493/fpubh-13-1349645-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b8/12081414/8ed474fdd8b4/fpubh-13-1349645-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b8/12081414/324210734b2d/fpubh-13-1349645-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b8/12081414/0d9b87514493/fpubh-13-1349645-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b8/12081414/8ed474fdd8b4/fpubh-13-1349645-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

Front Public Health. 2025-5-2

[2]
Atezolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen (IPSOS): a cost-effectiveness analysis in the USA.

BMJ Open. 2024-11-12

[3]
Cost-effectiveness of second-line atezolizumab in Canada for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

J Med Econ. 2019-3-25

[4]
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Adv Ther. 2020-3-19

[5]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective.

Front Public Health. 2023

[6]
First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from China.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021-10

[7]
Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.

JAMA Netw Open. 2019-9-4

[8]
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with PD-L1 Expression Status in Japan.

Clin Drug Investig. 2023-11

[9]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with PD-L1 test for the first-line treatment of NSCLC.

Cancer Med. 2020-3

[10]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line pembrolizumab treatment for PD-L1 positive, non-small cell lung cancer in China.

J Med Econ. 2019-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Non-small-cell lung cancer.

Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024-9-26

[2]
Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Atezolizumab versus Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Ineligible for Platinum-Containing Regimens.

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024-4-12

[3]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen: a United Kingdom health care perspective.

Front Public Health. 2023

[4]
First-line atezolizumab monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen (IPSOS): a phase 3, global, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled study.

Lancet. 2023-8-5

[5]
Cost-effectiveness evaluation based on two models of first-line atezolizumab monotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high-PDL1 expression.

Front Oncol. 2023-3-14

[6]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023-3

[7]
Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis.

Front Public Health. 2022

[8]
The Predictive Value of PD-L1 Expression Level in Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab/Pembrolizumab.

Front Oncol. 2022-4-22

[9]
Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.

Value Health. 2022-2

[10]
Atezolizumab compared to chemotherapy for first-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression: a cost-effectiveness analysis from US and Chinese perspectives.

Ann Transl Med. 2021-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索