Chiu Tiffany, Gesser Nili, Katz Benjamin W, Burmeister Ellei, Anderson RaeAnn E
Department of Education, Health, and Behavior Studies, University of North Dakota, Education Building Room 200, 231 Centennial Drive Stop 7189, Grand Forks, ND 58202-7189 USA.
Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Science, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND USA.
Sex Cult. 2025;29(3):1297-1317. doi: 10.1007/s12119-025-10324-5. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
One in five women experience sexual victimization in her lifetime, making sexual victimization a significant public health crisis. This public health crisis also has detrimental health consequences. Understanding the scope of sexual violence and the effects of prevention programming requires accuracy in measuring sexual violence. Yet, a wealth of research suggests lack of precision in sexual violence measurement and potential confusion among respondents in how to interpret items on sexual victimization and perpetration questionnaires. Specifically, alcohol-involved sexual violence questions are among the hardest to operationalize in such questionnaires, due, in part to cultural ideas about alcohol and idiosyncratic effects of alcohol on behavior. The current study addressed this gap by assessing the construct validity of alcohol-involved sexual violence questionnaire items. We used a cognitive-interviewing qualitative approach to analyze interviews with forty participants to better understand the cognitive and interpretive language nuances between "took advantage of while drunk" and being "too drunk to consent." Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to identify and summarize differences in how stimuli were perceived and interpreted. Our thematic analysis identified three themes: (a) respondents used behavioral indicators as an indicator of impaired decision-making, (b) respondents perceived and expressed complexity in understanding alcohol-related consent, and (c) some respondents attributed the differences between the phrases to reflect experiences of either perpetration and victimization. The results underscore the importance of refining questionnaires using behavioral indicators of alcohol intoxication to differentiate between incapacitated and impaired alcohol-involved incidents, clarifying non-consent language, and being purposeful in describing a state or an action related to the consumption of alcohol, to better measure alcohol-involved sexual violence.
五分之一的女性在其一生中会遭受性侵害,这使得性侵害成为一个重大的公共卫生危机。这一公共卫生危机也会产生有害的健康后果。了解性暴力的范围以及预防方案的效果需要准确衡量性暴力。然而,大量研究表明,性暴力测量缺乏精确性,而且受访者在如何解释性侵害和性犯罪问卷中的项目方面可能存在困惑。具体而言,涉及酒精的性暴力问题在这类问卷中是最难操作的问题之一,部分原因是关于酒精的文化观念以及酒精对行为的特殊影响。本研究通过评估涉及酒精的性暴力问卷项目的结构效度来填补这一空白。我们采用认知访谈的定性方法,对40名参与者的访谈进行分析,以更好地理解“趁醉酒时占便宜”和“醉得无法同意”之间在认知和解释语言上的细微差别。进行定性主题分析,以识别和总结对刺激的感知和解释方式上的差异。我们的主题分析确定了三个主题:(a)受访者将行为指标用作决策能力受损的指标;(b)受访者在理解与酒精相关的同意方面感知并表达出复杂性;(c)一些受访者认为这两个短语之间的差异反映了犯罪和受害经历。研究结果强调了使用酒精中毒行为指标完善问卷的重要性,以区分无行为能力和受损的涉及酒精事件,澄清不同意的措辞,并在描述与饮酒相关的状态或行为时做到有的放矢,以便更好地衡量涉及酒精的性暴力。