Steinmetz Michael P, O'Toole John E, Harrop James S, Mariscal Gonzalo, Chaput Christopher D, Arnold Paul M, Jacobs W Bradley, Witiw Christopher D, Sasso Rick C
Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Sep 1;50(17):E347-E360. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005396. Epub 2025 May 19.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of diabetes on spinal surgery outcomes.
Diabetes mellitus is believed to be associated with an increased risk of adverse events during spinal surgery. With the increasing prevalence of diabetes and the increasing number of degenerative spinal procedures, understanding postsurgical expectations and optimal care is essential.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, selecting studies comparing diabetes and those without diabetes who underwent spine fusion surgeries. Eighteen studies with 118,617 patients were included. The outcomes of interest were the risk of the incidence of spinal pseudoarthrosis and PROMs, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, and SF-12/36 score. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for dichotomous variables, mean differences (MD) for continuous variables, and standard mean differences (SMD) for continuous variables not sharing the same scale or units. Random effects were used if there was evidence of statistical heterogeneity.
Eighteen studies, comprising 118,617 patients, were included in the final analysis. Diabetes patients had a higher incidence of pseudoarthrosis at the lumbar spine (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.25, P < 0.05). Patients with diabetes also reported increased VAS back/neck pain scores (SMD: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.28, P < 0.001) and worse ODI outcomes (MD: 3.96, 95% CI: 3.10 to 4.82, P < 0.001), EQ-5D (MD: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.08 to -0.03, P < 0.001) and SF-12/36 scores (SMD: -2.70, 95% CI: -4.99 to -0.41, P < 0.05).
Patients with diabetes who underwent spinal surgery had a higher incidence of pseudoarthrosis and worse functional outcomes compared with nondiabetic patients. These findings underscore the need for targeted clinical management and preventive strategies for patients with diabetes undergoing these procedures.
Level III.
系统评价与荟萃分析。
本荟萃分析旨在全面评估糖尿病对脊柱手术结局的影响。
糖尿病被认为与脊柱手术期间不良事件风险增加有关。随着糖尿病患病率的上升以及退行性脊柱手术数量的增加,了解术后预期和最佳护理至关重要。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,在PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行系统检索,选择比较接受脊柱融合手术的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的研究。纳入18项研究,共118,617例患者。感兴趣的结局是脊柱假关节形成的发生率风险和患者报告结局(PROMs),包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、EQ-5D和SF-12/36评分。对二分变量计算比值比(OR),对连续变量计算平均差(MD),对不具有相同量表或单位的连续变量计算标准化平均差(SMD)。如果有统计学异质性的证据,则采用随机效应模型。
最终分析纳入18项研究,共118,617例患者。糖尿病患者腰椎假关节形成的发生率较高(OR:1.13,95%CI:1.02至1.25,P<0.05)。糖尿病患者还报告VAS背部/颈部疼痛评分增加(SMD:0.21,95%CI:0.14至0.28,P<0.001)、ODI结局更差(MD:3.96,95%CI:3.10至4.82,P<0.001)、EQ-5D(MD:-0.06,95%CI:-0.08至-0.03,P<0.001)和SF-12/36评分(SMD:-2.70,95%CI:-4.99至-0.41,P<0.05)。
与非糖尿病患者相比,接受脊柱手术的糖尿病患者假关节形成的发生率更高,功能结局更差。这些发现强调了对接受这些手术的糖尿病患者进行针对性临床管理和预防策略的必要性。
三级。