患者报告的结局指标得分与医疗保健成本及住院情况之间的关系:犹他州mEVAL和价值驱动型结局的结果
The relationship among patient reported outcome measure scores with health care costs and inpatient admission: results from Utah mEVAL and value driven outcomes.
作者信息
Kroencke Rachel, Gombart Zoe, Zhang Yue, Li Haojia, Hess Rachel
机构信息
Department of Internal Medicine, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Room 5R218, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente NW, Portland, OR, USA.
出版信息
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 May 19;9(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00889-y.
BACKGROUND
Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) profile patient health status, have been found to be helpful in identifying high health care utilizers, and may be useful in providing targeted interventions to decrease health care costs. In 2013 the University of Utah Health (UU Health) began collecting mental and physical health PROMs using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments through a tool called My Evaluation (mEVAL). In 2012 UU Health began cataloguing inpatient and outpatient healthcare-associated costs. The objective of this study was to identify association of poor PROMIS physical function and depression scores with (1) likelihood of inpatient hospitalization and (2) overall inpatient healthcare costs.
METHODOLOGY
This study was a retrospective observational cohort study including patients seen at UU Health between 1/2013 and 12/2017 who completed PROMIS instruments at an outpatient visit using the mEVAL platform. PROMIS instruments were completed prior to outpatient visits. The primary outcome was time to incident hospitalization modeled by using the Cox proportional hazards approach. For cost analysis, raw inpatient healthcare costs were fitted using a median regression model. Both results were adjusted.
RESULTS
Of 92,383 people, the average age was 48 (SD 18.6); 57% were female; and 87% identified as non-Hispanic white. A total of 11,909 patients who completed one or both of the mEVAL PROMIS instruments were admitted. The average PROMIS physical function and depression scores were 44.9 and 51.1, respectively. Those with worse physical function scores and worse depression scores were more likely to be hospitalized [HR = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.678, 1.872); HR (95% CI) = 1.149 (1.059, 1.246), respectively]. A physical function score 1.5 SD below the mean was associated with an increased median hospitalization cost of $2496; there was no statistically significant association between depression score 1.5 SD above mean and hospitalization costs.
CONCLUSIONS
Poor physical function scores were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and higher inpatient health costs, while poor depression scores were only associated with increased risk of hospitalization. Future work should examine if improvement in these PROMs alters these metrics.
背景
患者报告结局测量(PROMs)可描述患者的健康状况,已被证明有助于识别高医疗服务使用者,并且可能有助于提供针对性干预措施以降低医疗成本。2013年,犹他大学健康中心(UU Health)开始通过名为“我的评估”(mEVAL)的工具,使用患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)工具收集心理和身体健康的PROMs。2012年,UU Health开始对住院和门诊医疗相关费用进行编目。本研究的目的是确定PROMIS身体功能和抑郁评分不佳与(1)住院可能性和(2)总体住院医疗费用之间的关联。
方法
本研究为回顾性观察队列研究,纳入了2013年1月至2017年12月期间在UU Health就诊并使用mEVAL平台在门诊就诊时完成PROMIS工具的患者。PROMIS工具在门诊就诊前完成。主要结局是使用Cox比例风险法建模的首次住院时间。对于成本分析,使用中位数回归模型拟合原始住院医疗费用。两个结果均进行了调整。
结果
在92383人中,平均年龄为48岁(标准差18.6);57%为女性;87%为非西班牙裔白人。共有11909名完成了一项或两项mEVAL PROMIS工具的患者入院。PROMIS身体功能和抑郁评分的平均值分别为44.9和51.1。身体功能评分较差和抑郁评分较差的患者住院的可能性更大[风险比(HR)=1.77,95%置信区间(CI)(1.678,1.872);HR(95%CI)分别为1.149(1.059,1.246)]。身体功能评分比平均值低1.5个标准差与住院费用中位数增加2496美元相关;抑郁评分比平均值高1.5个标准差与住院费用之间无统计学显著关联。
结论
身体功能评分不佳与住院风险增加和住院医疗费用较高相关,而抑郁评分不佳仅与住院风险增加相关。未来的工作应研究这些PROMs的改善是否会改变这些指标。