Suppr超能文献

摩洛哥灾难性和致贫性卫生支出的发生率:新方法的附加值:来自2014年全国家庭生活水平调查的证据

The incidence of catastrophic and impoverishing health spending in Morocco: the value added of new methodologies : Evidence from the 2014 National Household Living Standards Survey.

作者信息

Hassani Abdeljalil, Bakhat Mohcine, Boudhar Abdeslam

机构信息

Laboratory of Applied Economic and Management Modelling (MAEGE), Faculty of Legal, Economic and Social Sciences, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.

Laboratory of Research in Economics and Management of Organizations (LAREMO), National School of Business and Management, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, Beni-Mellal, Morocco.

出版信息

Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s10754-025-09397-4.

Abstract

One of the key objectives of the Moroccan government in achieving universal health coverage (UHC) in Morocco is to improve household financial protection against catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). However, there is no consensus on how to measure CHE. Moreover, measuring CHE using traditional methods poses a challenge for equity analysis and pro-poor policy initiatives. Therefore, this paper aims to conduct an in-depth national analysis to inform policymakers about the extent, distribution and causes of financial hardship. In addition, this study aimed to explore the equity and policy implications of different capacity-to-pay (CTP) methodologies for calculating CHE in Morocco. We present estimates of catastrophic and impoverishing health spending incidence using different methods. These methods include (i) the budget share method (BS method), (ii) the partial normative food expenditure method (Normative food method), (iii) Wagstaff and Eozenou's approach (WAE approach), and (iv) the normative food, housing (rent), and utilities (FHU) method (WHO EURO method). The data comes from the 2014 Moroccan National Household Consumption and Expenditure Survey (NHCES). To measure changes in financial protection between the four calculation methods, we also use a weighted financial protection index (FP index) and another index measuring the fairness of financial contributions (FFC). CHE incidence estimates were similar using the WHO EURO method and the BS method at the threshold of 15% of a household's CTP. The estimate of impoverishing out-of-pocket payments (OOP) was 1.31% when using the food poverty line (FOOD-PL) and 1.93% when using the FHU poverty line (FHU-PL). In addition, the further impoverishing OOP estimate was 3.39% and 5.41% using the FOOD-PL and FHU-PL, respectively. The study shows that, unlike the new methods, conventional methods overestimate the financial burden of the better-off. The BS method suggests that the Moroccan health system is egalitarian, while the new approaches suggest that it meets normative equity objectives. The FP index and the FFC decrease as the poverty line rises. Medicine is the first driver of financial hardship. The monetary transfer needed to compensate for the impoverishment caused by OOP is about 141 MAD and 269 MAD per person per year, using FOOD-PL and FHU-PL, respectively. The results suggest that the health insurance system should be reviewed to further reduce CHE and impoverishment in Morocco. The use of the BS method to track target 3.8.2 of the SDGs raises concerns about the ability of the SDG process to generate appropriate policy guidance on UHC. Studies using different approaches. such as this one. are expected to facilitate informed decision-making and prevent potential political manipulation in demonstrating the success or failure of a policy. HIGHLIGHTS: • Our study evaluates the equity implications of different CTP methods for estimating CHE in Morocco. • Traditional methods systematically overstate the financial burden on wealthier households. • The WHO EURO methodology provides the most accurate assessment, capturing both the regressive nature of CHE incidence and the progressive pattern of OOP/CTP. • Findings reinforce the importance of Morocco's ongoing health financing reforms to reduce out-of-pocket payments. • Future research should incorporate forgone care and coping strategies to enhance financial protection analysis.

摘要

摩洛哥政府在摩洛哥实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)的关键目标之一是加强家庭抵御灾难性医疗支出(CHE)的经济保障。然而,对于如何衡量CHE尚无共识。此外,使用传统方法衡量CHE对公平性分析和扶贫政策举措构成挑战。因此,本文旨在进行深入的全国性分析,为政策制定者提供有关经济困难程度、分布和原因的信息。此外,本研究旨在探讨摩洛哥不同支付能力(CTP)方法在计算CHE方面的公平性和政策影响。我们使用不同方法给出了灾难性和致贫性医疗支出发生率的估计值。这些方法包括:(i)预算份额法(BS法);(ii)部分规范性食品支出法(规范性食品法);(iii)瓦格斯塔夫和厄泽努的方法(WAE方法);以及(iv)规范性食品、住房(租金)和公用事业(FHU)法(世卫组织欧洲区域方法)。数据来自2014年摩洛哥全国家庭消费和支出调查(NHCES)。为衡量四种计算方法之间经济保障的变化,我们还使用了加权经济保障指数(FP指数)和另一个衡量财务贡献公平性的指数(FFC)。在家庭CTP的15%这一门槛上,使用世卫组织欧洲区域方法和BS法得出的CHE发生率估计值相似。使用食品贫困线(FOOD-PL)时,致贫性自付费用(OOP)估计值为1.31%,使用FHU贫困线(FHU-PL)时为1.93%。此外,使用FOOD-PL和FHU-PL时,进一步致贫性OOP估计值分别为3.39%和5.41%。研究表明,与新方法不同,传统方法高估了富裕家庭的经济负担。BS法表明摩洛哥卫生系统是平等主义的,而新方法表明它符合规范性公平目标。随着贫困线上升,FP指数和FFC下降。药品是经济困难的首要驱动因素。使用FOOD-PL和FHU-PL时,补偿OOP造成的贫困所需的货币转移分别约为每人每年141摩洛哥迪拉姆和269摩洛哥迪拉姆。结果表明,应审查医疗保险制度,以进一步减少摩洛哥的CHE和贫困现象。使用BS法跟踪可持续发展目标的具体目标3.8.2引发了人们对可持续发展目标进程能否就全民健康覆盖产生适当政策指导的担忧。使用不同方法(如本研究)进行的研究有望促进明智决策,并防止在证明一项政策的成败时出现潜在的政治操纵。要点:• 我们的研究评估了摩洛哥不同CTP方法在估计CHE方面的公平性影响。• 传统方法系统性地高估了富裕家庭的经济负担。• 世卫组织欧洲区域方法提供了最准确的评估,既捕捉到了CHE发生率的累退性质,也捕捉到了OOP/CTP的累进模式。• 研究结果强化了摩洛哥正在进行的卫生筹资改革对于减少自付费用的重要性。• 未来的研究应纳入放弃治疗和应对策略,以加强经济保障分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验