Flanagan Meghan R, van den Bruele Astrid M Botty, Downs-Canner Stephanie M, Thomas Samantha M, Gallagher Kristalyn K, Jakub James W, Tevis Sarah E A, Verdial Francys C, Zhang Jennifer Q, Elmore Leisha C, Mukhtar Rita A, Brennan Malia, Lillie Margaret, Gibson Tammeza C, Verosky Alexandra, Plichta Jennifer K, Rosenberger Laura H
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17406-6.
Contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) is a rare event and is considered stage IV disease. We sought to evaluate outcomes in a CAM cohort treated with curative intent and contemporary systemic and locoregional therapy.
A retrospective multi-institutional review was conducted from 2016 to 2022 of patients with CAM who underwent axillary surgery. Survival outcomes were compared with those with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
In total, 754 patients were included in the study (63 CAM, 188 LABC, and 503 MBC). The median age at CAM diagnosis was 62 years [(interquartile range (IQR) 49.2-69.3)], and the majority demonstrated invasive ductal histology (74.6%). Over half of the patients with CAM received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (55.6%) followed by axillary dissection (82.5%) and adjuvant radiation (74.6%) in most cases. On unadjusted analysis, the LABC cohort demonstrated the highest 3-year unadjusted overall survival (OS) (89.4%), followed by CAM (79.7%) and MBC (53%) (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, insurance, and hormone receptor status, patients with MBC had inferior survival compared with LABC [hazard ratio (HR) 6.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.22-10.28, p < 0.001], while CAM had similar survival to that seen in LABC (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.82-5.52, p = 0.12).
Survival was higher for patients with CAM compared with MBC and was similar to patients with LABC. Though the LABC group demonstrated better recurrence-free survival than the CAM group, these numbers were comparable within the first 2 years of follow-up. Our data provides additional support for the consideration of curative intent management for patients with CAM.
对侧腋窝转移(CAM)是一种罕见事件,被视为IV期疾病。我们试图评估接受根治性治疗以及当代全身和局部区域治疗的CAM队列患者的预后。
对2016年至2022年期间接受腋窝手术的CAM患者进行了一项回顾性多机构研究。将生存结果与局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)和转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者的结果进行比较。
该研究共纳入754例患者(63例CAM、188例LABC和503例MBC)。CAM诊断时的中位年龄为62岁[四分位间距(IQR)49.2 - 69.3],大多数为浸润性导管组织学类型(74.6%)。超过一半的CAM患者接受了新辅助化疗(55.6%),随后大多进行了腋窝清扫(82.5%)和辅助放疗(74.6%)。在未调整分析中,LABC队列的3年未调整总生存率(OS)最高(89.4%),其次是CAM(79.7%)和MBC(53%)(p < 0.001)。在对年龄、种族/民族、保险和激素受体状态进行多变量分析调整后,MBC患者的生存率低于LABC[风险比(HR)6.59,95%置信区间(CI)4.22 - 10.28,p < 0.001],而CAM的生存率与LABC相似(HR 2.13,95% CI 0.82 - 5.52,p = 0.12)。
CAM患者的生存率高于MBC患者,与LABC患者相似。尽管LABC组的无复发生存率优于CAM组,但在随访的前2年内这些数字具有可比性。我们的数据为考虑对CAM患者进行根治性治疗提供了额外支持。