Ghehi Leyla Mortazavi, Jafarabadi Mohammad Asghari, Hakimi Sevil, Nourizadeh Roghaiyeh, Mehrabi Esmat, Bafrani Mahdie Arab
Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3144, Australia.
BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03774-4.
Menopausal women often face challenges in choosing appropriate interventions to mitigate distressing menopause symptoms, primarily due to concerns about treatment suitability. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) on conflict and regret in menopause symptoms management.
This interventional study was conducted on 44 menopausal women aged ≥ 45 years in Tabriz, Iran, from September 2020 to January 2021. Subjects were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 22), which received SDM-based counseling along with a decision aid (DA) booklet, and control (n = 22) groups. The data were collected using a socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics checklist, awareness of the menopause symptoms management strategies, decisional conflict, and regret. The intergroup differences were compared employing an independent t-test and ANCOVA.
The mean score of decision conflict [Mean difference (MD): -2.07, 95% CI: -29.65 to -11.92, P = 0.001] and decision regret [MD: -1.25, 95% CI: -1.64 to 0.64, P = 0.03] significantly reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group after the intervention. Additionally, a statistically significant increase in the mean score of women's awareness was observed in the intervention group compared to the control group following the intervention [(Hormone Therapy: MD: 3.38, 95% CI: 1.01 to 5.57, P = 0.006) (Natural Products: MD: 2.44, 95% CI: 0.93 to 3.94, P = 0.002)].
The results indicated the effect of SDM-based counseling on improving women's awareness of the menopause symptoms management strategies and reducing the decisional conflict and regret.
更年期女性在选择合适的干预措施以减轻令人苦恼的更年期症状时常常面临挑战,主要是因为担心治疗的适用性。因此,本研究旨在评估共同决策(SDM)对更年期症状管理中的冲突和遗憾的影响。
本干预性研究于2020年9月至2021年1月在伊朗大不里士对44名年龄≥45岁的更年期女性进行。受试者被随机分为干预组(n = 22),接受基于共同决策的咨询以及一本决策辅助(DA)手册,和对照组(n = 22)。使用社会人口统计学和产科特征清单、对更年期症状管理策略的认识、决策冲突和遗憾来收集数据。采用独立t检验和协方差分析比较组间差异。
干预后,与对照组相比,干预组的决策冲突平均得分[平均差(MD):-2.07,95%置信区间:-29.65至-11.92,P = 0.001]和决策遗憾[MD:-1.25,95%置信区间:-1.64至0.64,P = 0.03]显著降低。此外,干预后与对照组相比,干预组女性的认识平均得分有统计学意义的增加[(激素疗法:MD:3.38,95%置信区间:1.01至5.57,P = 0.006)(天然产品:MD:2.44,95%置信区间:0.93至3.94,P = 0.002)]。
结果表明基于共同决策的咨询对提高女性对更年期症状管理策略的认识以及减少决策冲突和遗憾有效果。