McCabe John J, Cheung Yuen, Foley Marianne, Brennan Stephen O, Buckley Jane, Renom Pol Camps, Cassidy Tim, Collins Ronan, Dolan Eamon, Grosse Gerrit M, Harbison Joseph, James Kirstyn, Khadjooi Kayvan, Induruwa Isuru, Katan Mira, Maher Senan, O'Connor Margaret, O'Donnell Martin, Purroy Francisco, Synott Padraig, Kelly Peter J
Health Research Board Stroke Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
JAMA Neurol. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1337.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading cause of stroke, and oral anticoagulants (OAC) reduce this risk. However, there are limited data on the residual risk of recurrent stroke in patients with AF.
To determine the recurrent stroke risk in patients with AF by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eligible studies were identified by searching Ovid MEDLINE and Embase from inception (Ovid: January 1946; Embase: January 1970) until January 2025.
Eligible studies enrolled patients with prior ischemic stroke and AF, reported information on incidence of recurrent stroke, and had follow-up data for 1 or more years. Three reviewers independently screened abstracts and performed full-text reviews.
Data extraction was performed by 2 reviewers and independently verified by a third. Incidence rates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Analysis was repeated in patients whose qualifying event occurred despite OAC. Study quality was assessed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool.
The primary outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke. The secondary outcomes were any recurrent stroke (ischemic stroke or intra-cerebral hemorrhage [ICH]) and ICH during follow-up.
A total of 23 studies were identified, which included 78 733 patients and 140 307 years of follow-up. The median proportion of OAC use across studies was 92%. The pooled incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke was 3.75% per year (95% CI, 3.17%-4.33%). The risk was higher in noninterventional observational cohorts (4.20% per year; 95% CI, 3.41%-4.99%) compared with randomized clinical trials (2.26% per year; 95% CI, 1.96%-2.57%) (P value for interaction <.001). The risk of any recurrent stroke was 4.88% per year (95% CI, 3.87%-5.90%), and the risk of ICH was 0.58% per year (95% CI, 0.43%-0.73%). In patients with stroke despite OAC, the risk was 7.20% per year (95% CI, 5.05%-9.34%) for ischemic stroke, 8.96% per year (95% CI, 8.25%-9.67%) for any stroke, and 1.40% per year (95% CI, 0.40%-2.40%) for ICH.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, even with modern prevention therapy, the residual recurrence risk after AF-related stroke is high, with an estimated 1 in 6 patients experiencing a recurrent ischemic stroke at 5 years. These data demonstrate an urgent need to improve our understanding of the biological processes responsible for recurrence, improve risk stratification, and develop new secondary prevention strategies after AF-related stroke.
心房颤动(AF)是中风的主要原因,口服抗凝剂(OAC)可降低这种风险。然而,关于AF患者复发性中风的残余风险的数据有限。
通过进行系统评价和荟萃分析来确定AF患者的复发性中风风险。
通过检索Ovid MEDLINE和Embase从创刊(Ovid:1946年1月;Embase:1970年1月)至2025年1月来识别符合条件的研究。
符合条件的研究纳入既往有缺血性中风和AF的患者,报告复发性中风的发生率信息,并具有1年或更长时间的随访数据。三名评审员独立筛选摘要并进行全文评审。
由两名评审员进行数据提取,并由第三名评审员独立核实。使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总发病率。对尽管使用了OAC仍发生符合条件事件的患者重复进行分析。使用预预后研究质量工具评估研究质量。
主要结局是复发性缺血性中风。次要结局是随访期间的任何复发性中风(缺血性中风或脑出血[ICH])和ICH。
共识别出23项研究,包括78733例患者和140307人年的随访。各研究中OAC使用的中位比例为92%。复发性缺血性中风的汇总年发生率为3.75%(95%CI,3.17%-4.33%)。与随机临床试验(每年2.26%;95%CI,1.96%-2.57%)相比,非干预性观察队列中的风险更高(每年4.20%;95%CI,3.41%-4.99%)(交互作用P值<.001)。任何复发性中风的风险为每年4.88%(95%CI,3.87%-5.90%),ICH的风险为每年0.58%(95%CI,0.43%-0.73%)。在尽管使用了OAC仍发生中风的患者中,缺血性中风的风险为每年7.20%(95%CI,5.05%-9.34%),任何中风的风险为每年8.96%(95%CI,8.25%-9.67%),ICH的风险为每年1.40%(95%CI,0.40%-2.40%)。
在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,即使采用现代预防治疗,AF相关中风后的残余复发风险仍然很高,估计每6名患者中就有1名在5年内发生复发性缺血性中风。这些数据表明迫切需要增进我们对导致复发的生物学过程的理解,改善风险分层,并制定AF相关中风后的新二级预防策略。