Bjørnstad Johannes Lagethon, Waagan Sandra Stedje, Tegnander Tiril Karina, Ottestad Anne Madsi
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Open Heart. 2025 May 21;12(1):e003312. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003312.
The treatment of aortic valve disease has changed following the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Hence, the selection of patients for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is changing. Thus, we aimed to study survival and causes of death following surgical AVR at a large Scandinavian Centre in the period 2012-21.
Information about the surgical procedure, survival and cause of death was obtained from the National Norwegian Health Registries. The latest clinical information about the deceased patients was made available from the local hospitals and examined to evaluate the causes of death from The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry.
From 2012 to 2021, the number of surgical implantations of aortic valve bioprostheses (AVR(b)) and patient age at the time of surgery decreased. Outcomes were excellent, with 30-day survival of 98.6% following AVR(b) and 99.8% following AVR(m). 1-year survival after AVR(b) improved from 96.4% in the first half to 98.4% in the second half of the study period, probably due to a reduction of operative risk during the study period. Non-cardiovascular mortality was the most frequent cause of death, followed by cancer, cardiovascular and valve-related death. Deaths due to cerebral bleeding or stroke were the least frequent with 10-year estimators of 1.3% and 1.6% following AVR(m) and AVR(b), respectively. The inter-rater reliability between The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry and the journal information provided was moderate, with an unweighted Cohen's kappa of 0.56 (0.47-0.64).
Valve-related death and death from cerebral bleeding or stroke was rare after surgical AVR. Survival was high and improved during the study period. Surgical AVR may be performed safely in low-risk patients.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的引入改变了主动脉瓣疾病的治疗方式。因此,接受外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)患者的选择也在发生变化。于是,我们旨在研究2012年至2021年期间,在一家大型斯堪的纳维亚中心接受外科AVR后的生存率和死亡原因。
从挪威国家卫生注册机构获取有关手术过程、生存率和死亡原因的信息。从当地医院获取已故患者的最新临床信息,并根据挪威死亡原因登记处对死亡原因进行评估。
2012年至2021年期间,主动脉瓣生物假体(AVR(b))的外科植入数量以及手术时的患者年龄均有所下降。手术效果良好,AVR(b)术后30天生存率为98.6%,AVR(m)术后为99.8%。AVR(b)术后1年生存率从研究期前半段的96.4%提高到后半段的98.4%,这可能是由于研究期间手术风险降低所致。非心血管疾病死亡率是最常见的死亡原因,其次是癌症、心血管疾病和瓣膜相关死亡。脑出血或中风导致的死亡最为少见,AVR(m)和AVR(b)术后10年的估计发生率分别为1.3%和1.6%。挪威死亡原因登记处与所提供的期刊信息之间的评分者间信度为中等,未加权的Cohen's kappa为0.56(0.47 - 0.64)。
外科AVR术后,瓣膜相关死亡以及脑出血或中风导致的死亡较为罕见。生存率较高且在研究期间有所提高。低风险患者可安全地进行外科AVR。