Suppr超能文献

利用黑头呆鱼(Pimephales promelas)了解消费品中塑料添加剂对微塑料毒性的影响。

Understanding the contribution of plastic additive in microplastic toxicity from consumer products using fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas).

作者信息

Hermabessiere Ludovic, Best Carol, Zaidi Sabrina, McIlwraith Hayley K, Jeffries Kenneth M, Rochman Chelsea M

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada.

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 50 Sifton Road, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 May;32(23):14258-14271. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36523-z. Epub 2025 May 22.

Abstract

Microplastics are ubiquitous in the environment. Once in the environment, these particles are ingested by organisms. The ingestion of microplastics can lead to various adverse effects. Still, what is driving the toxicity of microplastics is not well understood. Microplastics are a diverse suite of contaminants composed of several shapes, polymers, and chemical additives. The chemical additives in plastics are not always considered in toxicity studies despite their widespread presence in plastic products. We exposed fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) for 60 days to four treatments: polyethylene microplastics with chemical additives, polyethylene microplastics without chemical additives, chemical additive leachates, and a control (no plastic, no additives). The main objective of this experiment was to understand what is driving the toxicity: the plastic itself (particles), the chemical additives, or both. We took samples at 12, 30, and 60 days to measure the accumulation of plastic and their additives, as well as to look for adverse effects via gene expression and measurements of weight, length, and condition index. Fish exposed to plastic with or without additives had plastic in their gastro-intestinal tract. We did not observe accumulation of Bismuth, a pigment we targeted chemically in the polyethylene. We observed no significant differences in weight, length, or condition between treatments at 12, 30, and 60 days. We also observed no differences in survival. We observed a significant difference in the expression of the following genes among treatments: sod1, sod2, gstp1, and esr2b. Significant differences were generally due to a lower relative expression in fish exposed to the plastics with additives and the chemical additives alone. In conclusion, we observed effects at the molecular level that appeared to be driven by plastic additives. Future studies should continue to try to understand the effects of plastics driven by additives and consider them in risk assessment frameworks.

摘要

微塑料在环境中无处不在。一旦进入环境,这些颗粒就会被生物体摄入。微塑料的摄入会导致各种不良影响。然而,微塑料毒性的驱动因素尚未得到充分理解。微塑料是由多种形状、聚合物和化学添加剂组成的一类多样的污染物。尽管塑料中的化学添加剂广泛存在于塑料制品中,但在毒性研究中并不总是被考虑在内。我们将黑头呆鱼(Pimephales promelas)暴露于四种处理条件下60天:含有化学添加剂的聚乙烯微塑料、不含化学添加剂的聚乙烯微塑料、化学添加剂浸出液以及对照组(无塑料、无添加剂)。本实验的主要目的是了解毒性的驱动因素:是塑料本身(颗粒)、化学添加剂,还是两者皆有。我们在第12天、30天和60天取样,以测量塑料及其添加剂的积累情况,并通过基因表达以及体重、体长和状况指数的测量来寻找不良影响。暴露于含或不含添加剂塑料的鱼在其胃肠道中有塑料。我们没有观察到铋的积累,铋是我们在聚乙烯中进行化学靶向的一种色素。在第12天、30天和60天,我们没有观察到各处理组之间在体重、体长或状况方面存在显著差异。我们也没有观察到存活率的差异。我们观察到各处理组之间在以下基因的表达上存在显著差异:sod1、sod2、gstp1和esr2b。显著差异通常是由于暴露于含添加剂塑料和仅化学添加剂的鱼中相对表达较低。总之,我们在分子水平上观察到的影响似乎是由塑料添加剂驱动的。未来的研究应继续努力了解添加剂驱动的塑料影响,并在风险评估框架中加以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验