• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从零保费计划转换为正保费计划后的保险覆盖范围保留与计划转换

Coverage Retention and Plan Switching Following Switches From a Zero- to a Positive-Premium Plan.

作者信息

Drake Coleman, Nagy Dylan, Avina Sarah, Ludwinski Daniel, Anderson David M

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Department of Economics, Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2025 May 2;6(5):e251424. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1424.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1424
PMID:40408089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12102699/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Millions of lower-income Health Insurance Marketplace enrollees were defaulted from zero-premium to positive-premium health plans in 2022, 2023, and 2024. This turnover in zero-premium plans may cause coverage losses by creating administrative burdens that complicate enrollees' ability to maintain coverage.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how turnover affected Marketplace reenrollment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used log-linear fixed-effects models including counties in 29 states that used the HealthCare.gov platform from 2022 through 2024.

EXPOSURE

HealthCare.gov enrollees living in a county that experienced turnover that year.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

County-year-level counts of overall reenrollment, automatic and active enrollment, and active reenrollment split by whether enrollees stayed with or switched from their previous plan. We controlled for premium affordability, insurer competition, other county characteristics, and state-by-year policy changes.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 2159 counties representing roughly 10 million HealthCare.gov enrollees annually in 29 states that used the HealthCare.gov platform from 2022 through 2024. The share of enrollees living in counties exposed to turnover increased from 10.3% to 93.9% from 2021 to 2022 as the American Rescue Plan Act subsidies were implemented. These increases have persisted into 2024. Turnover across insurers was associated with a 7.0% (95% CI, -12.7 to -1.3) decrease in automatic reenrollment. Any turnover was not associated with changes in active enrollment, though it was associated with a 13.4% decrease (95% CI, -17.7 to -9.1) in enrollees choosing to stay with their previous, default plan and a roughly equivalent 15.0% increase (95% CI, 11.5-18.5) in enrollees choosing to switch plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Turnover affects coverage losses by decreasing automatic, passive reenrollment among lower-income enrollees that may not realize they need to start paying premiums to retain coverage that previously did not have a premium. Turnover also nudges returning enrollees to select new plans rather than selecting their previous plans. This likely increases insurer price competition but also may create hassles for enrollees. These findings suggest that coverage losses from turnover in 2026 among lower-income Marketplace enrollees may be particularly large if enhanced subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act expire.

摘要

重要性

在2022年、2023年和2024年,数以百万计的低收入医保市场参保者从零保费医保计划被默认转为正保费医保计划。零保费计划的这种更替可能会造成行政负担,使参保者维持保险覆盖的能力复杂化,从而导致保险覆盖损失。

目的

确定更替如何影响医保市场重新参保情况。

设计、背景和参与者:这项横断面研究使用对数线性固定效应模型,纳入了2022年至2024年使用医保.gov平台的29个州的县。

暴露因素

当年经历了计划更替的医保.gov参保者所在的县。

主要结局和测量指标

按参保者是否继续选择之前的计划或更换计划划分的县年度总体重新参保、自动和主动参保以及主动重新参保的计数。我们控制了保费可承受性、保险公司竞争、其他县的特征以及逐年的州政策变化。

结果

样本包括2159个县,代表2022年至2024年每年使用医保.gov平台的29个州中约1000万医保.gov参保者。随着《美国救援计划法案》补贴的实施,2021年至2022年,经历计划更替的县中参保者的比例从10.3%增至93.9%。这些增长一直持续到2024年。保险公司之间的更替与自动重新参保率下降7.0%(95%置信区间,-12.7至-1.3)相关。任何更替与主动参保的变化无关,不过它与选择继续使用之前默认计划的参保者减少13.4%(95%置信区间,-17.7至-9.1)以及选择更换计划的参保者增加约15.0%(95%置信区间,11.5-18.5)相关。

结论

更替通过降低低收入参保者的自动、被动重新参保率来影响保险覆盖损失,这些参保者可能没有意识到他们需要开始支付保费以保留之前无需付费的保险覆盖。更替还促使重新参保的人选择新计划而非之前的计划。这可能会增加保险公司之间的价格竞争,但也可能给参保者带来麻烦。这些发现表明,如果《降低通胀法案》的强化补贴到期,2026年低收入医保市场参保者因计划更替导致的保险覆盖损失可能会特别大。

相似文献

1
Coverage Retention and Plan Switching Following Switches From a Zero- to a Positive-Premium Plan.从零保费计划转换为正保费计划后的保险覆盖范围保留与计划转换
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 May 2;6(5):e251424. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1424.
2
Turnover in Zero-Premium Status Among Health Insurance Marketplace Plans Available to Low-Income Enrollees.医保市场计划中零保费参保者的参保流动率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr 22;3(4):e220674. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0674. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules.美国医疗保险市场自动续保规则修改后的预计计划入保结果。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 16;2(7):e211642. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1642. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Terminating Cost-Sharing Reduction Subsidy Payments: The Impact Of Marketplace Zero-Dollar Premium Plans On Enrollment.终止成本分担削减补贴支付:市场零保费计划对参保的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):41-49. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00345.
5
Participation, Pricing, and Enrollment in a Health Insurance "Public Option": Evidence From Washington State's Cascade Care Program.参与、定价和参加健康保险“公共选择”:华盛顿州 Cascades Care 计划的证据。
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):190-217. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12546. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
6
The Affordability Of Individual-Market Health Insurance In California Under The American Rescue Plan Act, 2021.《美国救援计划法案下 2021 年加利福尼亚个体医疗保险的负担能力》。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jul;42(7):1011-1020. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01419.
7
Individual market health plan affordability after cost-sharing reduction subsidy cuts.个户医保计划在自付减免补贴削减后的负担能力。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):730-738. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13190. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Three years in - changing plan features in the U.S. health insurance marketplace.三年来,美国医保市场不断调整计划特色。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3198-3.
9
When All That Glitters Is Gold: Dominated Plan Choice on Covered California for the 2018 Plan Year.当所有的闪光都是金子:2018 计划年度加州保险交易所的主导计划选择。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1059-1087. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12518. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
How Much Financial Protection Do Marketplace Plans Provide in States Not Expanding Medicaid?在未扩大医疗补助计划的州,市场计划能提供多少经济保护?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Jun;16:1-14.

本文引用的文献

1
Coverage and Access Changes During Medicaid Unwinding.医疗补助计划逐步取消期间的覆盖范围和获得情况的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e242193. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2193.
2
Health Plan Switching and Health Care Utilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.健康计划转换与医疗保健利用:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Mar 1;5(3):e240324. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0324.
3
Small Marketplace Premiums Pose Financial And Administrative Burdens: Evidence From Massachusetts, 2016-17.小型市场保费带来财务和行政负担:来自马萨诸塞州 2016-17 年的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jan;43(1):80-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00649.
4
Dynamic Price Competition for Low-Cost Silver Plans on Healthcare.gov 2014-2021.2014-2021 年 Healthcare.gov 上低价银计划的动态价格竞争
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Oct;80(5):540-547. doi: 10.1177/10775587231183567. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
5
Can Automatic Retention Improve Health Insurance Market Outcomes?自动保留能否改善健康保险市场的结果?
AEA Pap Proc. 2021 May;111:560-566. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20211083.
6
How do low-income enrollees in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces respond to cost-sharing?《平价医疗法案》市场中的低收入参保者如何应对费用分担?
J Risk Insur. 2023 Mar;90(1):155-183. doi: 10.1111/jori.12416. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
7
Turnover in Zero-Premium Status Among Health Insurance Marketplace Plans Available to Low-Income Enrollees.医保市场计划中零保费参保者的参保流动率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr 22;3(4):e220674. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0674. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Estimated Plan Enrollment Outcomes After Changes to US Health Insurance Marketplace Automatic Renewal Rules.美国医疗保险市场自动续保规则修改后的预计计划入保结果。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 16;2(7):e211642. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1642. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Automatic Insurance Policies - Important Tools for Preventing Coverage Loss.自动保险政策——防止保险范围丧失的重要工具。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):408-411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2114189. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
10
Rural-Urban Differences In Individual-Market Health Plan Affordability After Subsidy Payment Cuts.补贴削减后,个体医疗保险计划支付能力的城乡差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):2032-2040. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00917.