• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无家可归成年人的医疗保健可及性与利用情况

Health Care Access and Use Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.

作者信息

Fields Jessica D, Assaf Ryan D, Nguyen Kim Hanh, Platamone Corbin C, Pottebaum J Margo, Giannola Jesica, Kushel Margot B

机构信息

Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, Division of Health Equity and Society, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

University of California, Berkeley-University of California, San Francisco Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2025 May 2;6(5):e250820. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0820.

DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0820
PMID:40408090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12102704/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Demographic and policy changes have occurred since the last large, representative study of homeless adults in the 1990s, which may affect health care access and use.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of poor health care access and short-term health care and use the Gelberg-Andersen Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations to assess the association between changes in homelessness with health care access and short-term care use.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This representative survey of adults experiencing homelessness in California from October 2021 to November 2022 used multistage, venue-based, and respondent-driven sampling. Data were analyzed from May 2023 to December 2024.

EXPOSURES

Shelter status (predisposing vulnerable), insurance (enabling), impairment with activities of daily living (ADL; need), and illicit substance use during the previous 6 months (need).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The study assessed self-reported no prior-year ambulatory care use and prior 6-month unmet health care need, unmet medication need, emergency department (ED) use, and hospitalization. Population prevalence estimates with Wald 95% CIs and multivariable Poisson regressions were calculated to compute prevalence ratios (PRs).

RESULTS

Thirty-two hundred adults completed the survey (mean age, 46.1 [95% CI, 45.3-46.9] years; 1965 cisgender men [67.2%], 1148 cisgender women [31.2%], and 57 transgender and gender queer individuals [1.6%]), of whom 2016 (77.6%) were unsheltered, 2609 (82.6%) were insured, 1056 (34.4%) had an ADL impairment, and 911 (37.1%) reported illicit substance use 3 or more times a week. A total of 1121 (39.1%) reported no ambulatory care use; 765 (24.3%) reported an unmet health care need and 714 (23.3%) an unmet medication need; 1252 (38.9%) used the ED; and 668 (22.0%) were hospitalized. Lack of ambulatory care use (PR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.51-1.94) and unmet health care needs (PR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.40) were more prevalent for those who were unsheltered. Lack of ambulatory care use (PR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57-0.70) and unmet health care needs (PR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.95) were less prevalent for those with insurance. Unmet health care needs (PR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.79-2.55), ED use (PR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.30), and hospitalization (PR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.40-2.17) were more prevalent for those with an ADL impairment. Lack of ambulatory care use (PR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79) and unmet health care needs (PR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.55) were more prevalent for those who used illicit substances 3 or more times a week.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found that adults experiencing homelessness reported poor access to ambulatory care and a high prevalence of short-term care use, despite high rates of insurance. Changes in homelessness during the past 30 years were associated with worsened health care access and use.

摘要

重要性

自20世纪90年代上次对无家可归成年人进行的大型代表性研究以来,人口结构和政策发生了变化,这可能会影响医疗保健的可及性和使用情况。

目的

描述医疗保健可及性差和短期医疗保健的患病率,并使用弱势群体的格尔伯格 - 安德森行为模型评估无家可归状况的变化与医疗保健可及性和短期医疗使用之间的关联。

设计、背景和参与者:这项于2021年10月至2022年11月对加利福尼亚州无家可归成年人进行的代表性调查采用了多阶段、基于场所和受访者驱动的抽样方法。数据于2023年5月至2024年12月进行分析。

暴露因素

庇护状况(易患脆弱性)、保险(促成因素)、日常生活活动能力受损(ADL;需求)以及前6个月内的非法药物使用情况(需求)。

主要结局和指标

该研究评估了自我报告的上一年未使用门诊医疗服务以及前6个月未满足的医疗保健需求、未满足的药物需求、急诊室(ED)就诊情况和住院情况。计算了带有Wald 95%置信区间的总体患病率估计值以及多变量泊松回归,以计算患病率比值(PRs)。

结果

3200名成年人完成了调查(平均年龄46.1岁[95%置信区间,45.3 - 46.9岁];1965名顺性别男性[67.2%],1148名顺性别女性[31.2%],57名跨性别和性别酷儿个体[1.6%]),其中2016人(77.6%)无庇护场所,2609人(82.6%)有保险,1056人(34.4%)日常生活活动能力受损,911人(37.1%)报告每周使用非法药物3次或更多次。共有1121人(39.1%)报告未使用门诊医疗服务;765人(24.3%)报告有未满足的医疗保健需求,714人(23.3%)报告有未满足的药物需求;1252人(38.9%)使用了急诊室;668人(22.0%)住院治疗。对于无庇护场所的人来说,未使用门诊医疗服务(PR,1.71;95%置信区间,1.51 - 1.94)和未满足的医疗保健需求(PR,1.19;95%置信区间,1.02 - 1.40)更为普遍。对于有保险的人来说,未使用门诊医疗服务(PR,0.63;95%置信区间,0.57 - 0.70)和未满足的医疗保健需求(PR,0.80;95%置信区间,0.67 - 0.95)不太普遍。对于日常生活活动能力受损的人来说,未满足的医疗保健需求(PR,2.13;95%置信区间,1.79 - 2.55)、急诊室就诊(PR,1.15;95%置信区间,1.02 - 1.30)和住院治疗(PR,1.74;95%置信区间,1.40 - 2.17)更为普遍。对于每周使用非法药物3次或更多次的人来说,未使用门诊医疗服务(PR,1.46;95%置信区间,1.19 - 1.79)和未满足的医疗保健需求(PR,1.30;95%置信区间,1.08 - 1.55)更为普遍。

结论与意义

这项横断面研究发现,尽管保险覆盖率较高,但经历无家可归的成年人报告称门诊医疗服务可及性差且短期医疗使用患病率高。过去30年中无家可归状况的变化与医疗保健可及性和使用情况的恶化有关。

相似文献

1
Health Care Access and Use Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.无家可归成年人的医疗保健可及性与利用情况
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 May 2;6(5):e250820. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0820.
2
Illicit Substance Use and Treatment Access Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.无家可归成年人中的非法药物使用与治疗途径
JAMA. 2025 Apr 8;333(14):1222-1231. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.27922.
3
Concurrent Disorders and Health Care Utilization Among Homeless and Vulnerably Housed Persons in Canada.加拿大无家可归者和住房条件差者的并发疾病与医疗保健利用情况
J Dual Diagn. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2017.1392055. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
4
Visual impairment and unmet eye care needs among homeless adults in a Canadian city.加拿大城市中无家可归成年人的视力障碍和未满足的眼保健需求。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):455-60. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6113.
5
Impact of hepatitis B and C infection on health services utilization in homeless adults: a test of the Gelberg-Andersen Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations.乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎感染对无家可归成年人卫生服务利用的影响:脆弱人群盖尔伯格-安德森行为模型的检验。
Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;31(1):20-30. doi: 10.1037/a0023643. Epub 2011 May 16.
6
Caregiving Needs Are Unmet for Many Older Homeless Adults: Findings from the HOPE HOME Study.许多老年无家可归成年人的照护需求未得到满足:HOPE HOME研究的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3611-3619. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07438-z. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
7
Suicide and self-injury-related emergency department visits and homelessness among adults 25-64 years old from 2016 to 2021 in the USA.2016 年至 2021 年美国 25-64 岁成年人与自杀和自残相关的急诊科就诊和无家可归情况。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Nov 21;41(12):749-756. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214115.
8
Emergency Department Use in a Cohort of Older Homeless Adults: Results From the HOPE HOME Study.一组老年无家可归成年人的急诊科使用情况:HOPE HOME研究结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;24(1):63-74. doi: 10.1111/acem.13070.
9
How accessible is medical care for homeless women?无家可归女性获得医疗服务的难度有多大?
Med Care. 2002 Jun;40(6):510-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200206000-00008.
10
Homelessness Among Patients in a Southeastern Safety Net Emergency Department.东南部一家安全网急诊科患者中的无家可归情况
South Med J. 2019 Sep;112(9):476-482. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001016.

本文引用的文献

1
Illicit Substance Use and Treatment Access Among Adults Experiencing Homelessness.无家可归成年人中的非法药物使用与治疗途径
JAMA. 2025 Apr 8;333(14):1222-1231. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.27922.
2
Novel methods to construct a representative sample for surveying California's unhoused population: the California Statewide Study of People Experiencing Homelessness.构建具有代表性样本以调查加利福尼亚州无家可归人口的新方法:加利福尼亚州全州无家可归者研究
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 May 7;194(5):1238-1248. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae323.
3
The Role of Street Medicine and Mobile Clinics for Persons Experiencing Homelessness: A Scoping Review.街头医学和流动诊所在解决无家可归者问题中的作用:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 12;21(6):760. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060760.
4
Homelessness And Health: Factors, Evidence, Innovations That Work, And Policy Recommendations.无家可归与健康:因素、证据、有效创新和政策建议。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Feb;43(2):164-171. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01049.
5
Unmet health needs and barriers to health care among people experiencing homelessness in San Francisco's Mission District: a qualitative study.旧金山米申区无家可归者的未满足健康需求和医疗保健障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 30;22(1):1071. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13499-w.
6
The Impact of Homelessness on Mortality of Individuals Living in the United States: A Systematic Review of the Literature.《美国无家可归者的死亡率的影响:文献系统综述》。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):457-477. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0035.
7
Overdose and Homelessness-Why We Need to Talk About Housing.药物过量与无家可归——为何我们需要探讨住房问题。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142685. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42685.
8
Comparison of Patient Experience Between Primary Care Settings Tailored for Homeless Clientele and Mainstream Care Settings.针对无家可归患者的初级保健机构与主流保健机构的患者体验比较。
Med Care. 2021 Jun 1;59(6):495-503. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001548.
9
Health care for homeless people.为无家可归者提供的医疗保健服务。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jan 14;7(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00241-2.
10
Comparing Unsheltered and Sheltered Homeless: Demographics, Health Services Use and Predictors of Health Services Use.比较无家可归者和有庇护所的无家可归者:人口统计学、卫生服务利用情况以及卫生服务利用的预测因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Feb;56(2):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00470-0. Epub 2019 Sep 24.