Kawatkar Aniket A, Thokala Praveen, Goodacre Steve, Baecker Aileen S, Sharp Adam L, Redberg Rita F, Lee Ming-Sum, Ferencik Maros, Sun Benjamin C
Research and Evaluation Department, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California, USA.
School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Sep;32(9):994-1002. doi: 10.1111/acem.70066. Epub 2025 May 24.
Early noninvasive cardiac testing (NIT) is often performed in the initial workup of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our study objective was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of adopting early NIT for risk stratification to avoid future nonfatal acute myocardial infarction (MI) or death.
To obtain the incremental difference in cost and clinical outcomes, we first conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study within the member population of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California integrated health care delivery system. We then adapted existing cost effectiveness models to generate long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by NIT.
The cohort included 89,387 patients (mean age 57 years, 58% female) and 19% received early NIT. Total cost was higher by $2357 (95% confidence interval [CI] $77 to $4821) for early NIT compared to no early NIT and was mainly due to the increased cost of the index ED visit. Early NIT was associated with lower composite risk of death/nonfatal MI (absolute risk difference -3.7%, 95% CI -4.4% to -3.01%) during a 1-year follow-up. From a payor's perspective, early NIT was cost-effective at $5268/QALYs.
In patients with suspected ACS evaluated in the ED, incorporation of early NIT was associated with an overall increase in cost of health care that was driven by increased cost of the initial ED visit. However, due to the significant clinical benefits, early NIT was cost-effective in the low- and intermediate-risk patients while it is a dominant strategy in high-risk patients saving cost and QALYs.
对于因疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者,早期非侵入性心脏检查(NIT)常在初始检查中进行。我们的研究目的是计算采用早期NIT进行风险分层以避免未来非致命性急性心肌梗死(MI)或死亡的成本效益。
为获得成本和临床结果的增量差异,我们首先在南加州凯撒永久医疗集团综合医疗服务系统的成员人群中进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。然后,我们采用现有的成本效益模型来生成NIT所带来的长期成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。
该队列包括89387例患者(平均年龄57岁,58%为女性),19%接受了早期NIT。与未进行早期NIT相比,早期NIT的总成本高出2357美元(95%置信区间[CI]为77美元至4821美元),主要原因是首次ED就诊成本增加。在1年的随访中,早期NIT与较低的死亡/非致命MI复合风险相关(绝对风险差异为-3.7%,95%CI为-4.4%至-3.01%)。从支付方的角度来看,早期NIT的成本效益为每QALY 5268美元。
在ED评估的疑似ACS患者中,纳入早期NIT与医疗保健成本的总体增加相关,这是由首次ED就诊成本增加所驱动的。然而,由于显著的临床益处,早期NIT在低风险和中等风险患者中具有成本效益,而在高风险患者中是一种占优策略,可节省成本和QALY。