Suppr超能文献

电子标准化推荐信(eSLOE)2.0:审视更新后的急诊医学电子标准化推荐信前两个申请周期的数据。

eSLOE 2.0: Examining Data From the First 2 Application Cycles of the Updated Emergency Medicine Electronic Standardized Letter of Evaluation.

作者信息

Bord Sharon, Karl Erin, Franzen Doug, Hegarty Cullen B, House Joseph B, Hiller Katherine M, Hamilton Kevin, Pelletier-Bui Alexis

机构信息

is a Clerkship and Subinternship Director and Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

is an Associate Program Director and Clerkship Director, Hennepin County Medical Center Emergency Medicine Residency, and Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Apr;17(2):211-216. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00501.1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.

Abstract

The emergency medicine (EM) Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE) was created to provide a standardized, concise, and differentiated evaluation of EM residency applicants. It was revised in 2022 (eSLOE 2.0) to better align with the shift toward competency-based evaluations in undergraduate and graduate medical education. To investigate how applicants were rated by evaluators on the new competency-based component and revised normative-based components of the eSLOE 2.0 and to establish preliminary validity for the new letter format. Data from the first 2 application cycles utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 (2022-2023, 2023-2024) were accessed via a national EM database. The data specifically from parts A (core EM clinical skills), B (professionalism and interpersonal skills), and C (anticipated guidance during residency and rank list placement) were examined. Data from the 11 789 letters, representing 6543 unique applicants, revealed that 44.8% to 71.7% of applicants were designated as fully entrustable, and 27% to 50.7% as mostly entrustable on part A skills. Most applicants (81.7% to 85.7%) were placed as either 4 or 5 (1-5 Likert scale) in each part B skill. Nearly fifty-two percent (n=6076) were anticipated to need standard guidance in residency, while 32.8% (n=3872) were anticipated to need minimal guidance and 15.6% (n=1841) to need moderate or most guidance. In part C, 20.5% (n=2414) were designated as being in the top 10% on the rank list, 37.2% (n=4381) in the top third, 31.6% (n=3727) in the middle third, and 10.0% (n=1178) in the lower third. The findings from the first 2 years of utilizing the eSLOE 2.0 format offer preliminary validity data on this new letter format.

摘要

急诊医学(EM)标准化评估信(SLOE)旨在为急诊医学住院医师申请人提供标准化、简洁且有区分度的评估。它于2022年进行了修订(eSLOE 2.0),以更好地与本科和研究生医学教育向基于能力的评估转变相契合。旨在调查评估者如何根据eSLOE 2.0中基于新能力的部分和修订后的基于规范的部分对申请人进行评分,并为新的信件格式建立初步效度。通过一个全国性的急诊医学数据库获取了使用eSLOE 2.0的前两个申请周期(2022 - 2023年、2023 - 2024年)的数据。特别对来自A部分(核心急诊医学临床技能)、B部分(职业素养和人际技能)以及C部分(住院期间预期指导和排名列表位置)的数据进行了检查。来自11789封信件的数据,代表6543名独特的申请人,显示在A部分技能方面,44.8%至71.7%的申请人被指定为完全可托付,27%至50.7%的申请人被指定为大部分可托付。在B部分的每项技能中,大多数申请人(81.7%至85.7%)被评为4或5(1 - 5李克特量表)。预计近52%(n = 6076)的人在住院期间需要标准指导,而32.8%(n = 3872)的人预计需要最少指导,15.6%(n = 1841)的人预计需要中等或最多指导。在C部分,20.5%(n = 2414)被指定在排名列表中处于前10%,37.2%(n = 4381)处于前三分之一,31.6%(n = 3727)处于中间三分之一,10.0%(n = 1178)处于后三分之一。使用eSLOE 2.0格式的前两年的研究结果为这种新的信件格式提供了初步效度数据。

相似文献

2
Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation (SLOE): Findings From the New Electronic SLOE Format.
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):182-186. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00344.1.
3
The standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) in emergency medicine: The internal validity of the SLOE 2.0.
AEM Educ Train. 2025 Feb 14;9(1):e70000. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70000. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
9
Programmatic assessment of level 1 milestones in incoming interns.
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(6):694-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12393.
10
Hawks and Doves in Standardized Letters of Evaluation: 6 Years of Rating Distributions and Trends in Emergency Medicine.
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Jun;16(3):328-332. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00231.1. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Characteristics of Emergency Medicine Residency Programs With Unfilled Positions in the 2023 Match.
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Nov;82(5):598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
4
SLOE: A step in the right direction.
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jun 22;7(3):e10881. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10881. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Ethnic and Racial Differences in Ratings in the Medical Student Standardized Letters of Evaluation (SLOE).
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):549-553. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01174.1.
6
Racial Bias on the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):542-548. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-01144.1.
8
Lower-Third SLOE Rankings Impede, But Do Not Prevent, A Match in Emergency Medicine Residency Training.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Dec 17;7:2382120520980487. doi: 10.1177/2382120520980487. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
10
The Pass/Fail Decision for USMLE Step 1-Next Steps.
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2022-2023. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3938.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验