Ntanasis-Stathopoulos Ioannis, Filippatos Charalampos, Malandrakis Panagiotis, Kastritis Efstathios, Terpos Evangelos, Dimopoulos Meletios-Athanasios, Gavriatopoulou Maria
Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Department of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Blood Cancer J. 2025 May 26;15(1):104. doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01312-x.
While observation is the current standard of care for smoldering multiple myeloma (sMM), emerging evidence suggests that early therapeutic intervention may delay progression and improve outcomes especially for high-risk patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines in order to evaluate the effect of treatment compared to observation in outcomes of patients with sMM. Five studies (7 articles) involving 844 patients with intermediate or high risk sMM and comparing treatment to observation or placebo were deemed eligible. All studies reported progression-free survival results, with progression defined as time to active myeloma (without high heterogeneity, I = 42%, p = 0.14). A statistically significant 60% reduced pooled risk for disease progression or death (HR = 0.40, 95%CI:0.29-0.55) was revealed for patients who underwent treatment compared to those who did not. An exploratory sensitivity analysis involving 3 trials with only observation in the control group, revealed a 66% lower risk for disease progression or death (HR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.21-0.56) for patients in the treatment group compared to the control group. Furthermore, time-to-progression was reported in 3 studies; the pooled effect estimate revealed a statistically significant 58% reduced risk for progression to symptomatic MM (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.29-0.61) for patients who underwent treatment compared to those who did not. Only 2 trials reported mature overall survival outcomes, and the pooled effect estimate showed a 45% lower risk for death (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.37-0.82) for sMM patients who received treatment compared to those on observation. Regarding safety, the odds for serious adverse events for those on treatment was as 3.5 times as high (OR = 3.53, 95%CI: 1.14-10.91) compared to those on observation or placebo. In conclusion, this meta-analysis highlights the significant benefits of early treatment in selected patients with sMM, across key clinical outcomes. However, close monitoring is essential for the management of treatment-related toxicities.
虽然观察是目前对冒烟型多发性骨髓瘤(sMM)的标准治疗方法,但新出现的证据表明,早期治疗干预可能会延缓疾病进展并改善预后,尤其是对于高危患者。根据PRISMA指南进行了一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估与观察相比,治疗对sMM患者预后的影响。五项研究(7篇文章)涉及844例中高危sMM患者,比较了治疗与观察或安慰剂,被认为符合条件。所有研究均报告了无进展生存期结果,进展定义为出现活动性骨髓瘤的时间(异质性不高,I=42%,p=0.14)。与未接受治疗的患者相比,接受治疗的患者疾病进展或死亡的合并风险显著降低60%(HR=0.40,95%CI:0.29-0.55)。一项探索性敏感性分析涉及3项仅在对照组进行观察的试验,结果显示治疗组患者疾病进展或死亡的风险比对照组低66%(HR=0.34,95%CI:0.21-0.56)。此外,3项研究报告了进展时间;合并效应估计显示,与未接受治疗的患者相比,接受治疗的患者进展为有症状MM的风险显著降低58%(HR=0.42,95%CI:0.29-0.61)。只有2项试验报告了成熟的总生存期结果,合并效应估计显示,与接受观察的sMM患者相比,接受治疗的患者死亡风险降低45%(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.37-0.82)。关于安全性,与接受观察或安慰剂的患者相比,接受治疗的患者发生严重不良事件的几率高出3.5倍(OR=3.53,95%CI:1.14-10.91)。总之,这项荟萃分析突出了早期治疗对部分sMM患者在关键临床结局方面的显著益处。然而,密切监测对于治疗相关毒性的管理至关重要。