Carner Marco, Bianconi Luca, Sacchetto Luca, Arietti Valerio, Nocini Riccardo, Salvetta Maria Sofia, Maulu Giuditta, Diodati Alessandro, Turchet Luca
ENT Department, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, P.Le L.A. Scuro, 10, 37100 Verona, Italy.
Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jun;77(6):2239-2246. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05449-w. Epub 2025 May 2.
Patients with bimodal auditory stimulation represent an expanding group of cochlear implant users in many countries. The hearing results reported in the literature for subjects with bimodal hearing are controversial and often only evaluate hearing aids that are simply synchronized with their cochlear implant ("synchronized" regulation) and sometimes even adapted independently of the cochlear implant ("classic" regulation). This study aims to verify that the innovative "symbiotic'' regulation of the cochlear implant with an integrated hearing aid and dedicated fitting formula allows to achieve adequate rehabilitative hearing levels.
Thirty adult patients (12 females and 18 males; age range: 18-69 years) with bimodal hearing have been enrolled in a one-year study and divided into three groups of ten subjects for each of the regulation modes ("classic", "synchronized" and "symbiotic") applied to fit the cochlear implant and the hearing aid. Statistical analysis of the demographic characteristics and hearing outcomes observed in the three groups was conducted using the R statistical software.
For all subjects, the use of the "symbiotic" regulation approach with a dedicated bimodal regulation formula and integrated hearing aid allowed significantly better hearing performances (p < 0.05) compared to those obtained to either the "classic" or the "synchronized" regulations.
The "symbiotic" bimodal fitting formula provides significant hearing benefits compared to "classic" and "synchronized" regulation and it proves to be the ideal adjustment and coupling modality between a cochlear implant and a contralateral integrated hearing aid in bimodal listeners.
在许多国家,接受双模式听觉刺激的患者是人工耳蜗使用者中不断扩大的群体。文献中报道的双模式听力受试者的听力结果存在争议,并且通常仅评估与人工耳蜗简单同步的助听器(“同步”调节),有时甚至独立于人工耳蜗进行适配(“经典”调节)。本研究旨在验证人工耳蜗与集成助听器及专用适配公式的创新性“共生”调节能够实现足够的康复听力水平。
30名成年双模式听力患者(12名女性和18名男性;年龄范围:18 - 69岁)参与了一项为期一年的研究,并根据用于适配人工耳蜗和助听器的调节模式(“经典”、“同步”和“共生”)分为三组,每组10名受试者。使用R统计软件对三组观察到的人口统计学特征和听力结果进行统计分析。
对于所有受试者,与“经典”或“同步”调节相比,采用专用双模式调节公式和集成助听器的“共生”调节方法可显著提高听力表现(p < 0.05)。
与“经典”和“同步”调节相比,“共生”双模式适配公式可带来显著的听力益处,并且被证明是双模式听力者中人工耳蜗与对侧集成助听器之间理想的调节和耦合方式。