Wijesuriya Nadeev, Strocchi Marina, Elliott Mark, Mehta Vishal, De Vere Felicity, Howell Sandra, Liew Alphonsus, Kwan Jane, Bosco Paolo, Niederer Steven A, Rinaldi Christopher A
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Heart Rhythm. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.047.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivered with left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing may increase arrhythmic risk through detrimental effects on ventricular repolarization. Leadless LV endocardial CRT including leadless left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may mitigate this by preserving a more physiological transmural activation pattern.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of leadless LV endocardial and leadless LBBAP on repolarization metrics derived from electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi).
Ten patients with leadless endocardial CRT systems underwent a temporary pacing plus ECGi study, testing right ventricular, LV, and biventricular pacing (BiVP) settings, as well as atrioventricular-optimized LV pacing. Epicardial electrograms were used to derive metrics of repolarization and activation-recovery interval dispersion. The primary outcome measurements were acute improvement (ie, reduction) from baseline (right ventricular pacing or underlying rhythm) of these repolarization metrics.
Ten patients were studied; 5 had received LV lateral wall endocardial pacing, and 5 had received LBBAP with leadless septal wall pacing. The optimal leadless pacing setting significantly improved biventricular dispersion of repolarization by 23.7% ± 14% (P < .01), and this effect was more pronounced with LBBAP (29.3% ± 15%, P = .01) vs lateral wall pacing (18% ± 12%, P = .03). Similar results were observed for activation-recovery interval dispersion and biventricular repolarization gradients. The most pronounced improvements were observed where LV-only pacing as opposed to BiVP was used, either through LBBAP or atrioventricular-optimized LV pacing from any endocardial location.
Optimized leadless LV endocardial lateral wall pacing and LBBAP improve ECGi-derived ventricular repolarization metrics. LV-only pacing seemed superior to endocardial BiVP, potentially reflecting repolarization heterogeneity caused by a collision of 2 paced wavefronts.
通过左心室(LV)心外膜起搏进行心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可能通过对心室复极产生有害影响而增加心律失常风险。无导线左心室内膜CRT,包括无导线左束支区域起搏(LBBAP),可能通过保留更生理性的跨壁激活模式来减轻这种情况。
本研究旨在评估无导线左心室内膜起搏和无导线LBBAP对源自心电图成像(ECGi)的复极指标的影响。
10例植入无导线心内膜CRT系统的患者接受了临时起搏加ECGi研究,测试右心室、左心室和双心室起搏(BiVP)设置,以及房室优化的左心室起搏。心外膜电图用于得出复极和激活-恢复间期离散度的指标。主要结局测量指标是这些复极指标相对于基线(右心室起搏或基础心律)的急性改善(即降低)情况。
对10例患者进行了研究;5例接受了左心室侧壁心内膜起搏,5例接受了无导线间隔壁起搏的LBBAP。最佳无导线起搏设置使双心室复极离散度显著改善23.7%±14%(P<.01),与侧壁起搏(18%±12%,P=.03)相比,LBBAP(29.3%±15%,P=.01)的这种效果更明显。在激活-恢复间期离散度和双心室复极梯度方面也观察到了类似结果。在使用仅左心室起搏而非BiVP时,无论是通过LBBAP还是从任何心内膜位置进行房室优化的左心室起搏,都观察到了最显著的改善。
优化的无导线左心室内膜侧壁起搏和LBBAP可改善ECGi得出的心室复极指标。仅左心室起搏似乎优于心内膜BiVP,这可能反映了两个起搏波阵面碰撞导致的复极异质性。