Lehane Alison, Rauh Jessica L, Dantes Goeto, Alemayehu Hanna, Wallace Marshall, Zamora Irving J, Callier Kylie, Slater Bethany J, Krinock Derek, Vandewalle Robert, Witte Amanda, Flynn-O-Brien Katherine, Patwardhan Utsav M, Ignacio Romeo, Neff Lucas
Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Aug;60(8):162388. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162388. Epub 2025 May 27.
Pediatric choledocholithiasis is traditionally managed with an endoscopy-first approach, where Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, ERCP carries risks such as pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, and perforation, and may even be an unnecessary procedure should stones pass spontaneously. An alternative surgery-first approach, utilizing intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), power flushing, and glucagon, may offer a more efficient treatment pathway. This study aims to evaluate ERCP findings in pediatric patients undergoing an endoscopy-first pathway to characterize the nature and burden of stone disease in the common bile duct. Our ultimate goal is to determine the proportion of cases that could have been successfully managed with a surgery-first approach.
This retrospective, multi-center study analyzed 127 pediatric patients (≤18 years) who underwent ERCP prior to LC for suspected choledocholithiasis. Data from seven children's hospitals were reviewed, including imaging studies, ERCP findings, and stone characteristics. ERCP findings were categorized as sludge, small (<4 mm), medium (5-7 mm), large (>8 mm), or absent stones. Cases with sludge, small/medium stones, or negative ERCP findings were considered amenable to a surgery-first approach as they are known to be manageable with intraoperative techniques.
69 % of patients had ERCP findings that were amenable to transcystic surgical maneuvers without preoperative ERCP. Among those, 19 % had only sludge, 46 % had only stones, 24 % had sludge and stones, and 11 % had no evidence of obstruction. Large stones (>8 mm) were found in only 8 % of cases.
The findings support a surgery-first has potential for a paradigm shift as standard of care for pediatric choledocholithiasis, with ERCP reserved for select cases where surgical clearance fails or cholangitis is present. Adoption of this approach could reduce hospital stays, procedural risks, and healthcare costs while maintaining high efficacy in duct clearance. Prospective studies are warranted to refine clinical guidelines.
IV.
小儿胆总管结石传统上采用内镜优先的治疗方法,即在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)之前进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)。然而,ERCP存在胰腺炎、出血、感染和穿孔等风险,而且如果结石自行排出,ERCP甚至可能是不必要的操作。一种替代的手术优先方法,即利用术中胆管造影(IOC)、腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)、强力冲洗和胰高血糖素,可能提供更有效的治疗途径。本研究旨在评估接受内镜优先治疗途径的小儿患者的ERCP检查结果,以明确胆总管结石疾病的性质和负担。我们的最终目标是确定可以通过手术优先方法成功治疗的病例比例。
这项回顾性多中心研究分析了127例(≤18岁)因疑似胆总管结石而在LC之前接受ERCP的小儿患者。回顾了来自七家儿童医院的数据,包括影像学检查、ERCP检查结果和结石特征。ERCP检查结果分为胆泥、小结石(<4mm)、中等结石(5-7mm)、大结石(>8mm)或无结石。胆泥、小/中等结石或ERCP检查结果为阴性的病例被认为适合手术优先方法,因为已知这些情况可通过术中技术处理。
69%的患者ERCP检查结果适合经胆囊手术操作,无需术前ERCP。其中,19%仅有胆泥,46%仅有结石,24%既有胆泥又有结石,11%无梗阻证据。仅8%的病例发现大结石(>8mm)。
研究结果支持手术优先方法有可能成为小儿胆总管结石治疗的标准护理模式转变,ERCP仅用于手术清除失败或存在胆管炎的特定病例。采用这种方法可以减少住院时间、手术风险和医疗费用,同时保持胆管清除的高效性。有必要进行前瞻性研究以完善临床指南。
IV级