Akinaga Ayumi, Diacon Andreas H, Ocloo Remous, Yanagida Atsushi, Yoda Naofumi, Kawasaki Masanori, Liu Yongge
PHC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
TASK, Cape Town, South Africa.
Front Antibiot. 2025 May 15;4:1574688. doi: 10.3389/frabi.2025.1574688. eCollection 2025.
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health challenge. Culture-free, rapid, and quantitative biomarkers to monitor treatment response are critical to accelerate development of better TB treatments. The PATHFAST TB LAM Ag assay (PATHFAST-LAM), a desktop chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay that measures mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan (LAM) in sputum within 1 hour, is a promising candidate for this purpose. This study aimed to assess whether the PATHFAST-LAM can serve as a rapid, reliable biomarker for monitoring early treatment response in pulmonary TB.
We conducted a retrospective longitudinal repository study using stored sputum samples from 14-day early bactericidal activity trials involving 75 pulmonary TB patients who received one of five different regimens. The results were compared with those from the TB LAM ELISA "Otsuka" (LAM-ELISA), which was previously shown to measure early bactericidal activity but takes more than 5 hours to obtain results, and conventional culture-based methods.
The LAM concentrations in both raw and decontaminated sputum showed strong correlations between the PATHFAST-LAM and the LAM-ELISA, with Spearman's correlation coefficients of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.971 - 0.979) and 0.987 (95% CI: 0.984 - 0.989), respectively. LAM concentrations in raw and decontaminated sputum by the PATHFAST-LAM were also highly correlated with a Spearman coefficient of 0.957 (95% CI: 0.950 - 0.964). Importantly, the LAM concentrations by the PATHFAST-LAM correlated with bacterial loads determined by culture-based methods in all five treatment arms (Spearman's coefficients: 0.723 - 0.947). Furthermore, the change in LAM levels over the treatment period mirrored the changes in bacterial load. Additionally, culture-based methods often result in missing data due to contamination: in our study, we observed a missing data rate of 9.6% (62/649) on quantifying CFU counts and 4.2% (27/649) on obtaining a valid MGIT TTD, while we obtained a valid LAM value with the PATHFAST-LAM (0/634 in raw samples and 0/637 in decontaminated samples).
Our findings suggest that the PATHFAST-LAM can quantify bactericidal activity in the first 14 days of treatment with a quick turnaround time. The test's utility to monitor conversion from positive to negative and to predict relapse-free cure compared to culture-based methods should be determined in longer trials.
结核病仍然是一项全球性的健康挑战。用于监测治疗反应的无需培养、快速且定量的生物标志物对于加速更好的结核病治疗方法的开发至关重要。PATHFAST结核分枝杆菌脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖(LAM)检测法(PATHFAST-LAM)是一种台式化学发光酶免疫测定法,可在1小时内检测痰液中的分枝杆菌脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖(LAM),是实现这一目的的一个有前景的候选方法。本研究旨在评估PATHFAST-LAM是否可作为监测肺结核早期治疗反应的快速、可靠生物标志物。
我们进行了一项回顾性纵向储存库研究,使用了来自14天早期杀菌活性试验的储存痰液样本,该试验涉及75名接受五种不同治疗方案之一的肺结核患者。将结果与结核分枝杆菌LAM ELISA“大冢”法(LAM-ELISA)的结果进行比较,LAM-ELISA先前已被证明可测量早期杀菌活性,但需要超过5小时才能获得结果,同时还与传统的基于培养的方法进行了比较。
未经处理和经净化处理的痰液中的LAM浓度在PATHFAST-LAM和LAM-ELISA之间均显示出强相关性,Spearman相关系数分别为0.975(95%CI:0.971 - 0.979)和0.987(95%CI:0.984 - 0.989)。PATHFAST-LAM检测未经处理和经净化处理痰液中的LAM浓度也具有高度相关性,Spearman系数为0.957(95%CI:0.950 - 0.964)。重要的是,在所有五个治疗组中,PATHFAST-LAM检测的LAM浓度与基于培养的方法确定的细菌载量相关(Spearman系数:0.723 - 0.947)。此外,治疗期间LAM水平的变化反映了细菌载量的变化。此外,基于培养的方法由于污染常常导致数据缺失:在我们的研究中,我们观察到在定量CFU计数时数据缺失率为9.6%(62/649),在获得有效的MGIT检测时间(TTD)时数据缺失率为4.2%(27/649),而我们使用PATHFAST-LAM获得了有效的LAM值(未经处理样本中为0/634,经净化处理样本中为0/637)。
我们的研究结果表明,PATHFAST-LAM能够在治疗的前14天内快速周转定量杀菌活性。与基于培养的方法相比,该检测在监测从阳性转为阴性以及预测无复发生存方面的效用应在更长时间更长时间更长的试验中确定。