Willimon S Clifton, Wilson Philip L, Quinn Michael, Pang Joshua H, Perkins Crystal A, Ellis Henry B, Li Ying, Nepple Jeffrey J, Pandya Nirav K, Pennock Andrew T, Spence David D, Bae Donald S, Busch Michael T, Edmonds Eric W, Kocher Mininder S, Sabatini Coleen S, Heyworth Benton E
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, Texas.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 May 30;107(14):1553-1560. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00083.
Skin tenting is a commonly utilized surgical indication for clavicular fractures. The impact of skin tenting on fracture outcomes has not been investigated in adolescents. The present study compared the clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of nonoperatively and operatively treated adolescent clavicular fractures with skin tenting at presentation.
Patients 10 to 18 years old with completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures managed at 8 participating institutions from 2013 to 2022 were filtered to identify a cohort with either of 2 categories of skin tenting at initial presentation: (1) "skin tenting" or (2) "skin-at-risk for necrosis" (i.e., tented, white, and hypovascular). Demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, complications, time to return to sport, and PROMs (i.e., American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; Marx Shoulder Activity score; and European Quality of Life visual analog scale [EQ-VAS]) were analyzed at a minimum of 1-year follow-up.
A total of 88 (12%) of 764 prospectively enrolled adolescents with completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures presented with skin tenting. Patients with skin tenting had older age and greater comminution, shortening, and superior displacement than those without skin tenting. A total of 58 patients with skin tenting (66%) underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and 30 (34%) underwent nonoperative treatment, none of whom developed skin-related complications. However, 3 patients in the nonoperative cohort (10%) underwent early conversion to ORIF at a mean of 27 days (range, 6 to 62 days) post-injury. Although the nonoperative cohort was an average of <1 year younger than the ORIF cohort (nonoperative cohort, 14.5 years; ORIF cohort, 15.4 years; p = 0.04), there were no differences in sex (p = 0.23), shortening (p = 0.13), superior displacement (p = 0.14), or comminution (p = 0.32) between groups. PROMs were available for 63% of patients 1 or 2 years post-injury, with no differences in the PROMs European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) and EQ-VAS, complications (p = 0.76), or time to return to sport (p = 0.80) between treatment groups.
In this large cohort of prospectively enrolled adolescent patients with clavicular fractures, 12% of patients with completely displaced clavicular fractures presented with skin tenting, approximately one-third of whom were definitively treated nonoperatively, though 10% of the initial nonoperative cohort underwent early conversion to ORIF. Adolescents with skin tenting treated nonoperatively demonstrated no differences in PROMs, complications, or time to return to sport, compared with patients who underwent ORIF.
Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
皮肤绷紧是锁骨骨折常用的手术指征。青少年中皮肤绷紧对骨折预后的影响尚未得到研究。本研究比较了初次就诊时存在皮肤绷紧的青少年锁骨骨折非手术治疗和手术治疗的临床及患者报告结局指标(PROMs)。
对2013年至2022年在8家参与机构接受治疗的10至18岁完全移位的锁骨中段骨折患者进行筛选,以确定初次就诊时具有以下两类皮肤绷紧情况之一的队列:(1)“皮肤绷紧”;(2)“有坏死风险的皮肤”(即绷紧、苍白且血运减少)。在至少1年的随访中分析人口统计学、骨折特征、治疗、并发症、恢复运动时间和PROMs(即美国肩肘外科医师评分;手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评估;马克思肩部活动评分;以及欧洲生活质量视觉模拟量表[EQ-VAS])。
在764例前瞻性纳入的完全移位的锁骨中段骨折青少年中,共有88例(12%)初次就诊时存在皮肤绷紧。有皮肤绷紧的患者比没有皮肤绷紧的患者年龄更大,粉碎程度更高,缩短和向上移位更明显。共有58例有皮肤绷紧的患者(66%)接受了切开复位内固定(ORIF),30例(34%)接受了非手术治疗,这些患者均未出现与皮肤相关的并发症。然而,非手术治疗队列中有3例患者(10%)在受伤后平均27天(范围6至62天)接受了早期转为ORIF治疗。虽然非手术治疗队列的平均年龄比ORIF治疗队列小<1岁(非手术治疗队列,14.5岁;ORIF治疗队列,15.4岁;p = 0.04),但两组在性别(p = 0.23)、缩短(p = 0.13)、向上移位(p = 0.14)或粉碎程度(p = 0.32)方面没有差异。受伤后1年或2年时,63%的患者有PROMs数据,治疗组之间在PROMs欧洲生活质量5维度5水平版本(EQ-5D-5L)和EQ-VAS、并发症(p = 0.76)或恢复运动时间(p = 0.80)方面没有差异。
在这个前瞻性纳入的大量青少年锁骨骨折患者队列中,12%的完全移位锁骨骨折患者初次就诊时存在皮肤绷紧,其中约三分之一最终接受了非手术治疗,尽管最初非手术治疗队列中有10%的患者早期转为ORIF治疗。与接受ORIF治疗的患者相比,非手术治疗的有皮肤绷紧的青少年在PROMs、并发症或恢复运动时间方面没有差异。
治疗性II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。