Almeida Wesley N, Barros Kamila S, Nogueira-Filho Sérgio L G, Nogueira Selene S C
Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.
Laboratório de Estudo Animal, Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Caetité, Bahia, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0323711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323711. eCollection 2025.
Acoustic monitoring is emerging as a key tool in wildlife conservation, especially for species in inaccessible habitats like the rock cavy (Kerodon rupestris), an endangered species native to Brazil's threatened Caatinga biome. Emotional stress from threatening situations affects breathing, heart rate, and vocal muscle tension, altering vocal acoustic parameters. This allows researchers to gauge the animal's environmental perception through its vocalizations. We aimed to evaluate emotional disturbance indicators in free-range rock cavies' vocalizations to suggest an acoustic index during threats. We compared calls from rock cavies in two areas with similar habitats but that differ in terms of anthropic impacts. Area 1 (A1) is near urban areas and disturbed by livestock and dogs, and Area 2 (A2) is farther from urban areas and free from human disturbance. Data on calls and behaviors were collected ad libitum in both areas. The alarm whistle call, making up 73.5% of total calls, was most common. Across 108 observation hours per area, 392 alarm whistle calls were recorded, with more calls in A1 than A2 (223 vs. 169; Chi-square = 29.44, DF = 1, P < 0.001). This resulted in a 32% higher hourly call rate in A1 (2.6 calls/h vs. 1.6 calls/h). Both male and female cavies in A1 had higher high-frequency (F1, 388 = 7.80, P = 0.005) and peak-frequency calls (F1, 388 = 21.32, P < 0.001). Given the similar landscape and resource availability in both areas, the differences in call emission rate and parameters are likely linked to emotional responses to human disturbances in A1. Thus, alarm whistle calls at an hourly rate of 2.6 calls/h or higher, with high-frequency and peak-frequency at or above 7222 Hz and 2603 Hz, can indicate anthropogenic disturbance in the Caatinga biome, aiding remote monitoring efforts.
声学监测正成为野生动物保护中的一项关键工具,特别是对于生活在难以进入的栖息地中的物种,如岩豚鼠(Kerodon rupestris),这是一种原产于巴西受威胁的卡廷加生物群落的濒危物种。威胁情境下的情绪压力会影响呼吸、心率和发声肌肉张力,从而改变发声声学参数。这使得研究人员能够通过动物的发声来衡量其对环境的感知。我们旨在评估自由放养的岩豚鼠发声中的情绪干扰指标,以提出威胁期间的声学指数。我们比较了两个栖息地相似但受人类影响程度不同的地区的岩豚鼠叫声。区域1(A1)靠近市区,受到牲畜和狗的干扰,区域2(A2)离市区较远且没有人类干扰。在两个区域随意收集了叫声和行为数据。占总叫声73.5%的警报哨声最为常见。每个区域108个观察小时内,记录到392次警报哨声,A1的叫声比A2多(223次对169次;卡方检验=29.44,自由度=1,P<0.001)。这导致A1的每小时叫声率高出32%(2.6次/小时对1.6次/小时)。A1中的雄性和雌性豚鼠都有更高的高频(F1, 388 = 7.80,P = 0.005)和峰值频率叫声(F1, 388 = 21.32,P < 0.001)。鉴于两个区域的景观和资源可用性相似,叫声发射率和参数的差异可能与A1中对人类干扰的情绪反应有关。因此,每小时2.6次或更高的警报哨声率,以及高频和峰值频率分别在7222赫兹及以上和2603赫兹及以上,可表明卡廷加生物群落中的人为干扰,有助于远程监测工作。