Prindull G, Jürgens H, Jentsch F, Sauer R, Lasson U
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1985;110(2):127-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00402725.
Comparing the radiotherapy data of two groups of patients with non-metastatic Ewing sarcoma, we came to the following conclusions: intensive chemotherapy does not substitute for effective radiotherapy. Irradiation fields should be large enough to include the whole affected bone and the entire extra-osseous compartments, exempting only uninvolved epiphyses. Marginal recurrences are a major risk of the shrinking field technique. Single doses per fraction should be high and the total dose raised to the point of maximal irradiation tolerance of normal tissues.
比较两组非转移性尤因肉瘤患者的放疗数据后,我们得出以下结论:强化化疗不能替代有效的放疗。照射野应足够大,以包括整个受累骨骼和整个骨外间隙,仅不累及未受累的骨骺。边缘复发是缩野技术的主要风险。每次分割的单次剂量应较高,总剂量应提高到正常组织最大耐受照射剂量的程度。