Kroneman Madelon, Fermin Alfons, Rechel Bernd, Allin Sara, Anell Anders, Behmane Daiga, Bengough Theresa, Blümel Miriam, Bryndová Lucie, Davidovics Krisztina, Belvis Antonio Giulio De, Charalambous Chrystala, Economou Charalambos, Fadel Shaza, Fronteira Inês, Gaál Petér, Grignon Michel, Kowalska-Bobko Iwona, Lovrenčić Iva Lukačević, Mantwill Sarah, Murauskienė Liubovė, Reinap Marge, Rohova Maria, Saunes Ingrid Sperre, Theodorou Mamas, Waitzberg Ruth, Jong Judith D de
Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118 - 124, 3513 CR Utrecht, Netherlands.
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Health Policy. 2025 Aug;158:105351. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105351. Epub 2025 May 19.
Background Childhood vaccination rates fluctuate over time and do not always meet the levels recommended by the WHO. Objective This study aims to provide an overview of measures countries have introduced to increase vaccination rates. Methods We developed a structured data collection template that was completed by country experts from Europe, Israel, the USA, and Canada. Experts were identified using the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies' HSPM (Health Systems and Policy Monitor) network. We approached experts from 32 countries and received responses from 22 countries. In the template we asked for measures introduced between 2014 and 2019. The experts were asked to indicate the type of intervention, the target population, possible positive and negative effects, and evidence on effectiveness. The information was collected between September 2019 and January 2020. Results We identified four main types of interventions: restrictive measures for the unvaccinated, financial incentives, measures supporting the logistics of vaccination, and vaccination promotion campaigns. Restrictive measures often involved expanding existing mandatory vaccination policies or limiting access to pre-school activities for unvaccinated children. Financial incentives for healthcare providers showed some positive effects. Regarding logistical support, several countries used schools as alternative vaccination sites, though this presented organisational challenges. Many countries invested in improving knowledge among both healthcare professionals and parents to encourage vaccine uptake. Conclusions Most initiatives implemented in the countries covered focussed on communication and knowledge enhancement. However, there is limited evidence on the impact of these measures on vaccination coverage.
背景 儿童疫苗接种率随时间波动,且并不总是能达到世界卫生组织推荐的水平。目的 本研究旨在概述各国为提高疫苗接种率而采取的措施。方法 我们制定了一个结构化的数据收集模板,由来自欧洲、以色列、美国和加拿大的国家专家填写。专家通过欧洲卫生系统与政策观察站的HSPM(卫生系统与政策监测)网络确定。我们联系了32个国家的专家,收到了22个国家的回复。在模板中,我们询问了2014年至2019年期间采取的措施。要求专家指出干预类型、目标人群、可能的正面和负面影响以及有效性证据。信息收集于2019年9月至2020年1月之间。结果 我们确定了四种主要的干预类型:对未接种疫苗者的限制措施、经济激励措施、支持疫苗接种后勤工作的措施以及疫苗接种推广活动。限制措施通常包括扩大现有的强制疫苗接种政策或限制未接种疫苗儿童参加学前活动的机会。对医疗服务提供者的经济激励措施显示出一些积极效果。在后勤支持方面,一些国家将学校用作替代疫苗接种地点,不过这带来了组织方面的挑战。许多国家投入资金提高医疗专业人员和家长的知识水平,以鼓励接种疫苗。结论 在所涵盖国家实施的大多数举措都集中在沟通和知识提升方面。然而,关于这些措施对疫苗接种覆盖率影响的证据有限。