Wachs Sebastian, Schittenhelm Catherine, Kops Maxime, Gámez-Guadix Manuel, Wright Michelle F
Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Social Science, University of Münster, Germany.
Biological and Health Psychology Department, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J Adolesc. 2025 Aug;97(6):1645-1655. doi: 10.1002/jad.12525. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
This study investigated how a 1-week anti-hate speech intervention fosters positive classroom dynamics and improves adolescent well-being. Drawing on Social Capital Theory, we examined whether classroom cohesion enhances happiness among victimized and non-victimized students.
A sample of 820 adolescents aged 12 to 16 (M = 13.27, SD = 1.04) from 11 German schools was divided into an intervention group (n = 567), which participated in the intervention, and a control group (n = 253). Self-report measures of classroom cohesion, happiness, and hate speech victimization were administered before the intervention (T1) and again 1 month later (T2).
Multilevel mediation path analysis revealed that, within the victim subsample, the intervention had a significant direct effect on T2 happiness and mediated effect through classroom cohesion, indicating partial mediation. Conversely, in the non-victim subsample, the effect of the intervention on T2 happiness was fully mediated by classroom cohesion. Hence, the increase in happiness resulting from the intervention can be fully explained by improvements in classroom cohesion. This suggests that, in contrast to non-victims, victimized students derive unique direct benefits from the intervention, in addition to the positive impact of enhanced classroom cohesion.
The study underscores the significance of fostering strong social networks in educational settings as a key to student happiness. These insights point toward the potential benefits of tailored intervention approaches, particularly for students facing challenges related to victimization, and highlight the broader educational value of initiatives that build social capital within classrooms.
本研究调查了为期一周的反仇恨言论干预如何促进积极的课堂动态并改善青少年的幸福感。借鉴社会资本理论,我们检验了课堂凝聚力是否能提升受欺凌学生和未受欺凌学生的幸福感。
从11所德国学校抽取了820名12至16岁的青少年(M = 13.27,SD = 1.04)作为样本,分为参与干预的干预组(n = 567)和对照组(n = 253)。在干预前(T1)和1个月后(T2)分别进行了关于课堂凝聚力、幸福感和仇恨言论受害情况的自我报告测量。
多层次中介路径分析显示,在受欺凌子样本中,干预对T2时的幸福感有显著直接效应,并通过课堂凝聚力产生中介效应,表明部分中介作用。相反,在未受欺凌子样本中,干预对T2时幸福感的影响完全由课堂凝聚力中介。因此,干预带来的幸福感提升可以完全由课堂凝聚力的改善来解释。这表明,与未受欺凌的学生相比,受欺凌的学生除了能从增强的课堂凝聚力中获得积极影响外,还能从干预中获得独特的直接益处。
该研究强调了在教育环境中培养强大社会网络作为学生幸福关键的重要性。这些见解指出了量身定制干预方法的潜在益处,特别是对于面临与受害相关挑战的学生,并突出了在课堂内建立社会资本举措的更广泛教育价值。