Suppr超能文献

菱形肌肋间联合阻滞与菱形肌肋间阻滞对胸腔镜楔形切除术患者术后镇痛效果的比较

Comparison of the Effects of Combined Rhomboid Intercostal and Sub-Serratus Plane Block versus Rhomboid Intercostal Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Wedge Resection.

作者信息

Üstüner Ferhat, Kaya Fatma Nur, Aydın Leman Gökçenur, Cansabuncu Seda

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Bigadiç State Hospital, Bigadiç, Turkey.

Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Bursa Uludağ University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2025 Aug;39(8):2121-2128. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.003. Epub 2025 May 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the analgesic effects of rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block (RISS) and rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for wedge resection.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

A single-center tertiary surgery center.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists class I-III undergoing VATS wedge resection.

INTERVENTIONS

Ultrasound-guided RIB or RISS block implementation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were assigned to the RIB group or the RISS group as part of a multimodal analgesia. In addition to the blocks, multimodal analgesia consisted of paracetamol, tenoxicam, intravenous morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and tramadol as a rescue analgesic for both groups, in accordance with the medical literature. Pain scores assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and coughing, morphine consumption, rescue analgesic requirements, and side effects were recorded postoperatively for 48 hours. The RISS group had lower VAS scores at rest and with coughing at all time points except 12 hours (for both variables, p < 0.05 at 0 hour and p < 0.01 at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours). The first PCA demand time was significantly longer in the RISS group (p = 0.001). Morphine consumption via PCA was lower in the RISS group at all time points (p < 0.05 at 0 hours and p < 0.01 at 12, 24, and 48 hours). Recovery room stay and mobilization times also were shorter in the RISS group (p < 0.05 for both). Other parameters were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study with a multimodal analgesic approach, RISS provided superior analgesia compared to RIB in patients undergoing VATS for wedge resection.

摘要

目的

比较菱形肌肋间和锯肌下平面阻滞(RISS)与菱形肌肋间阻滞(RIB)对接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)楔形切除术患者术后镇痛的效果。

设计

一项前瞻性随机研究。

地点

单中心三级手术中心。

参与者

60例美国麻醉医师协会分级为I-III级且接受VATS楔形切除术的患者。

干预措施

超声引导下实施RIB或RISS阻滞。

测量指标及主要结果

患者被分配至RIB组或RISS组作为多模式镇痛的一部分。除了阻滞之外,根据医学文献,两组的多模式镇痛均包括对乙酰氨基酚、替诺昔康、通过患者自控镇痛(PCA)使用静脉吗啡以及曲马多作为补救镇痛药。术后48小时记录静息和咳嗽时通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的疼痛评分、吗啡消耗量、补救镇痛药需求以及副作用。RISS组在除12小时外的所有时间点静息和咳嗽时的VAS评分均较低(对于这两个变量,0小时时p<0.05,0.5、1、2、4、8、24和48小时时p<0.01)。RISS组首次PCA需求时间显著更长(p=0.001)。RISS组在所有时间点通过PCA的吗啡消耗量均较低(0小时时p<0.05,12、24和48小时时p<0.01)。RISS组的恢复室停留时间和活动时间也较短(两者均p<0.05)。两组的其他参数相似。

结论

在这项采用多模式镇痛方法的研究中,对于接受VATS楔形切除术的患者,RISS提供了优于RIB的镇痛效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验