Mullen Deborah M, Bergenstal Richard M, Johnson Mary, Cengiz Eda, Criego Amy, Deeb Larry, Goland Robin, Rudolph Justin, Arnold Kathleen C, Kruger Davida, Richter Sara
Management Department, Gary W. Rollins College of Business, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
International Diabetes Center, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025 Jun;51(3):333-344. doi: 10.1177/26350106251337486. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
PurposeThe purpose of the 2-phase study was to determine patient/family and clinician design preference, usability, and comprehension of ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) reportsMethodsA cross-sectional research design employing 2 phases was conducted. Patients and parents (n = 139) reviewed an educational guide and AGP report during a clinician consultation. They were directed to identify glucose trends before answering a design preferences and usability survey. Clinicians (n = 17) completed questionnaires about patients and personal experiences, design preferences, and expected future usability. Further study of the AGP (n = 21) evaluated a draft display AGP continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) + pump report, enhanced after the aforementioned blood glucose monitoring (BGM) and CGM survey through interviews using both scripted and unscripted questions.ResultsPatients identified glucose trends/patterns in all AGP reports (100% BGM; 98% CGM; 95% CGM + pump). Patients and clinicians felt that the single-page report added value both in and outside of the clinic, preferred this standardized data view compared to traditional device-specific reports, and saw value in the AGP combination of statistics and graphs. Insulin data were seen as useful but increased the difficulty of report interpretation; only 38% were able to accurately interpret the data and make self-treatment recommendations.ConclusionsPatients feel that the AGP report (BGM, CGM, CGM + pump) is useful for identifying new glucose patterns/trends. Patients report more confidence in making self-care adjustments (behavioral, lifestyle, and treatments) using the AGP report. For shared decision-making, the AGP report serves both patients' and clinicians' needs.
目的
这项两阶段研究的目的是确定患者/家属和临床医生对动态血糖图谱(AGP)报告的设计偏好、可用性和理解程度。
方法
采用了两阶段的横断面研究设计。患者和家长(n = 139)在临床医生会诊期间查看了一份教育指南和AGP报告。在回答设计偏好和可用性调查之前,他们被要求识别血糖趋势。临床医生(n = 17)完成了关于患者和个人经历、设计偏好以及预期未来可用性的问卷。对AGP的进一步研究(n = 21)评估了一份AGP动态血糖监测(CGM)+胰岛素泵报告草稿,该草稿在上述血糖监测(BGM)和CGM调查之后通过使用脚本化和非脚本化问题的访谈进行了改进。
结果
患者能够在所有AGP报告中识别出血糖趋势/模式(100% BGM;98% CGM;95% CGM +胰岛素泵)。患者和临床医生认为单页报告在诊所内外都增加了价值,与传统的特定设备报告相比,更喜欢这种标准化的数据视图,并且认为AGP统计数据和图表的组合有价值。胰岛素数据被认为是有用的,但增加了报告解读的难度;只有38%的人能够准确解读数据并做出自我治疗建议。
结论
患者认为AGP报告(BGM、CGM、CGM +胰岛素泵)有助于识别新的血糖模式/趋势。患者报告称,使用AGP报告在进行自我护理调整(行为、生活方式和治疗)时更有信心。对于共同决策,AGP报告满足了患者和临床医生双方的需求。