文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在结肠镜筛查中评估盲肠退缩语音定时器以优化退缩时间和腺瘤检出率。

Evaluation of the cecal withdrawal vocal timer in screening colonoscopies for optimizing withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate.

作者信息

Goldman Adam, Lang Alon, Levartovsky Asaf, Levy Idan, Laish Ido, Ben-Horin Shomron, Kopylov Uri

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Derech Sheba 2, Ramat Gan, Tel Hashomer 5262100, Israel.

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 May 28;18:17562848251341752. doi: 10.1177/17562848251341752. eCollection 2025.


DOI:10.1177/17562848251341752
PMID:40453920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12123124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Longer cecal withdrawal time has been linked to a higher adenoma detection rate (ADR), with a minimum duration of 6 min recommended. Therefore, we developed the cecal withdrawal vocal timer (CWVT), a novel software tool that is command-activated at cecal intubation and vocally informs the endoscopist of the withdrawal duration every minute. OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the efficacy of the CWVT in enhancing adenoma detection. DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center study of screening colonoscopies with adequate preparation and documented cecal intubation. METHODS: The primary endpoint was the change in the department's ADR before (2022) and after the CWVT introduction (January 2023-February 2024). Secondary endpoints included the ADR change between procedures with and without CWVT after its introduction and the ADR change among individual endoscopists. RESULTS: The study included 1098 and 1330 eligible colonoscopies pre- and post-CWVT introduction, respectively. Following CWVT introduction, 67.3% of colonoscopies were performed with activated CWVT, with a median withdrawal time of 8.7 (interquartile range: 6.9-11.8) min. The department ADR was 25.5% following CWVT introduction, without a significant difference compared to the year before (26.2%,  = 0.71). During the post-CWVT implementation period, colonoscopies with activated CWVT had higher ADR than those without (28.4% vs 19.5%, respectively,  < 0.001). The improvement was mainly driven by the detection of adenomas smaller than 10 mm and was consistent across 11 out of 12 months in this period and among most endoscopists. CONCLUSION: While an overall ADR improvement was not achieved with the CWVT, the ADR was higher in post-CWVT procedures that utilized the CWVT than those that did not, warranting further prospective studies to evaluate CWVT's contribution to screening colonoscopy performance.

摘要

背景:盲肠退镜时间延长与较高的腺瘤检出率(ADR)相关,建议最短持续时间为6分钟。因此,我们开发了盲肠退镜语音定时器(CWVT),这是一种新型软件工具,在盲肠插管时通过指令激活,并每分钟语音告知内镜医师退镜持续时间。 目的:评估CWVT在提高腺瘤检出率方面的疗效。 设计:一项回顾性、单中心研究,纳入准备充分且有盲肠插管记录的筛查结肠镜检查。 方法:主要终点是引入CWVT之前(2022年)和之后(2023年1月至2024年2月)科室ADR的变化。次要终点包括引入CWVT后使用和未使用CWVT的检查之间的ADR变化以及个体内镜医师的ADR变化。 结果:该研究分别纳入了引入CWVT之前和之后的1098例和1330例符合条件的结肠镜检查。引入CWVT后,67.3%的结肠镜检查在激活CWVT的情况下进行,中位退镜时间为8.7(四分位间距:6.9 - 11.8)分钟。引入CWVT后科室ADR为25.5%,与前一年(26.2%)相比无显著差异(P = 0.71)。在引入CWVT后的实施期间,激活CWVT的结肠镜检查的ADR高于未激活的(分别为28.4%和19.5%,P < 0.001)。这种改善主要由小于10毫米的腺瘤检出所驱动,在此期间的12个月中有11个月以及大多数内镜医师中均保持一致。 结论:虽然CWVT未实现整体ADR的改善,但在引入CWVT后使用该工具的检查中ADR高于未使用者,需要进一步进行前瞻性研究以评估CWVT对筛查结肠镜检查性能的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128e/12123124/b419f964dada/10.1177_17562848251341752-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128e/12123124/69d34fac842e/10.1177_17562848251341752-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128e/12123124/e1c12ea8ac4b/10.1177_17562848251341752-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128e/12123124/b419f964dada/10.1177_17562848251341752-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128e/12123124/69d34fac842e/10.1177_17562848251341752-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128e/12123124/e1c12ea8ac4b/10.1177_17562848251341752-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/128e/12123124/b419f964dada/10.1177_17562848251341752-fig3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of the cecal withdrawal vocal timer in screening colonoscopies for optimizing withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025-5-28

[2]
Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012-12-4

[3]
Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.

Surg Endosc. 2016-5

[4]
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019-11

[5]
Endoscopist-related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J-SCOUT study.

Dig Endosc. 2024-1

[6]
Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018-8-23

[7]
Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.

Endoscopy. 2016-1-25

[8]
Does the withdrawal time affect adenoma detection in non-screening colonoscopies?

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020-1

[9]
Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013-5-6

[10]
Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) Irrespective of Indication Is Comparable to Screening ADR: Implications for Quality Monitoring.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Computer-aided Detection of Polyps Does Not Improve Colonoscopist Performance in a Pragmatic Implementation Trial.

Gastroenterology. 2023-3

[2]
Variability in adenoma detection rate in control groups of randomized colonoscopy trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2023-2

[3]
Artificial Intelligence-Aided Colonoscopy Does Not Increase Adenoma Detection Rate in Routine Clinical Practice.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2022-11-1

[4]
Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer.

JAMA. 2022-6-7

[5]
Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2021-1

[6]
Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Gastroenterology. 2020-3

[7]
Compared Abilities of Endoscopic Techniques to Increase Colon Adenoma Detection Rates: A Network Meta-analysis.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018-12-6

[8]
Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.

Endoscopy. 2016-1-25

[9]
Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.

Surg Endosc. 2016-5

[10]
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索