Klumpe Stella, Mitchell Kelsey C, Cox Emma, Katz Jeffrey S, Lazarowski Lucia, Deshpande Gopikrishna, Gratch Jonathan, de Visser Ewart J, Ayaz Hasan, Li Xingnan, Franke Adrian A, Krueger Frank
Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Technology Dresden, Germany.
School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0324312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324312. eCollection 2025.
In the evolving landscape of technology, robots have emerged as social companions, prompting an investigation into social bonding between humans and robots. While human-animal interactions are well-studied, human-robot interactions (HRI) remain comparatively underexplored. Ethorobotics, a field of social robotic engineering based on ecology and ethology, suggests designing companion robots modeled on animal companions, which are simpler to emulate than humans. However, it is unclear whether these robots can match the social companionship provided by their original models. This study examined social bonding between humans and AIBOs, dog-inspired companion robots, compared to real dogs. Nineteen female participants engaged in 12 affiliative interactions with dogs and AIBOs across two counter-balanced, one-month bonding phases. Social bonding was assessed through urinary oxytocin (OXT) level change over an interaction, self-reported attachment using an adapted version of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale, and social companionship evaluations administering the Robot-Dog Questionnaire. To examine OXT level changes and self-reported attachment by comparing the two social companions, we conducted mixed-effects model analyses and planned follow-up comparisons. Frequency comparison, binary logistic regression, and thematic analysis were performed to analyze social companionship evaluations. Results revealed significant differences between dogs and AIBOs in fostering social bonds. OXT level change increased during interactions with dogs but decreased with AIBOs. Participants reported stronger attachment to dogs and rated them as better social companions. These findings highlight the current limitations of AIBOs in fostering social bonding immediately compared to dogs. Our study contributes to the growing HRI research by demonstrating an existing gap between AIBOs and dogs as social companions. It highlights the need for further investigation to understand the complexities of social bonding with companion robots, which is essential to implement successful applications for social robots in diverse domains such as the elderly and health care, education, and entertainment.
在不断发展的技术领域中,机器人已成为社交伙伴,这引发了对人类与机器人之间社会联系的研究。虽然人类与动物的互动已得到充分研究,但人类与机器人的互动(HRI)仍相对未被充分探索。伦理机器人学是一个基于生态学和动物行为学的社会机器人工程领域,它建议设计以动物伙伴为模型的陪伴机器人,因为动物比人类更容易模仿。然而,尚不清楚这些机器人是否能与它们的原始模型所提供的社会陪伴相匹配。本研究将人类与受狗启发的陪伴机器人爱宝(AIBO)之间的社会联系与真实的狗进行了比较。19名女性参与者在两个为期一个月的、相互平衡的亲密阶段中,与狗和爱宝进行了12次亲密互动。通过互动过程中尿液中催产素(OXT)水平的变化、使用改编版《列克星敦宠物依恋量表》进行的自我报告依恋以及使用《机器人狗问卷》进行的社会陪伴评估来评估社会联系。为了通过比较这两种社会伙伴来研究OXT水平变化和自我报告的依恋,我们进行了混合效应模型分析和计划的后续比较。进行了频率比较、二元逻辑回归和主题分析以分析社会陪伴评估。结果显示,在促进社会联系方面,狗和爱宝之间存在显著差异。与狗互动时OXT水平升高,而与爱宝互动时则降低。参与者报告对狗的依恋更强,并将它们评为更好的社会伙伴。这些发现凸显了与狗相比,爱宝目前在立即促进社会联系方面的局限性。我们的研究通过证明爱宝与狗作为社会伙伴之间存在的差距,为日益增长的人类与机器人互动研究做出了贡献。它强调了进一步研究以理解与陪伴机器人社会联系复杂性的必要性,这对于在老年人和医疗保健、教育以及娱乐等不同领域成功应用社会机器人至关重要。