Malhotra Ajay, Lee Chris, Khunte Mihir, Futela Dheeman, Moily Raj, Payabvash Seyedmehdi, Gandhi Dheeraj, Wintermark Max
From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (A.M., M.K., D.F., R.M., S.P.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Yale University (C.L.), New Haven, Connecticut.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 3;46(6):1093-1099. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8633.
Female neuroradiologists in clinical practice are outnumbered by their male counterparts. However, it is unknown whether there are differences in practice patterns and Medicare billing and payment between female and male neuroradiologists. Our aim was to compare representation, practice range, clinical productivity, and Medicare payments for female and male neuroradiologists.
A retrospective cross-sectional study of Medicare provider and service data was conducted. Male and female neuroradiologists who received Medicare payments from 2017 to 2021 and the services rendered were analyzed. Primary outcome was gender representation, mean payments received from Medicare, charges submitted, and codes billed. tests and Mann-Whitney tests were used to determine differences in payment and practice volume between male and female radiologists.
From 2017 to 2021, there were a total of 2701 neuroradiologists, of whom 526 (19.5%) were female, with a higher proportion of women in academic than nonacademic neuroradiology practice (23.3% versus 15.6%, respectively). On average, female neuroradiologists charged less (mean, standard error [SE], $642,489 [$14,756] versus $738,416 [$7800]; < .001) and were paid less by Medicare (mean [SE], $92,834 [$1877] versus $113,495 [$1044]; < .001) compared with their male counterparts. By contrast, female neuroradiologists had a higher payment-per-service ratio (mean [SE], 0.232 [0.001] versus 0.208 [0.0003]; < .001). Women billed fewer median total services (1802; interquartile range [IQR], 925-4726] versus 2461 [IQR, 1268-5781]; < .001), served fewer median beneficiaries (1232 [IQR, 705-1963] versus 1697 [IQR, 990-2682]; < .001), and billed fewer median unique codes (19 [IQR, 13-26] versus 23 [IQR, 17-33]; < .001). Temporal analysis of data across the 5-year study period showed that men consistently received higher payments than women, though the difference in mean Medicare charge ( = .03), mean Medicare payment ( = .04), and median number of services provided ( = .04) between the 2 cohorts is decreasing.
Female neuroradiologists were underrepresented, charged less, and received less overall payment compared with their male counterparts. Female neuroradiologists provided a smaller range and number of services, and a greater proportion of female neuroradiologists billed for higher-paying services. Further studies are needed to assess differences in part-time work and subspecialty representation to determine their impact.
在临床实践中,女性神经放射科医生的数量少于男性同行。然而,女性和男性神经放射科医生在执业模式以及医疗保险计费与支付方面是否存在差异尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较女性和男性神经放射科医生的代表性、执业范围、临床工作效率以及医疗保险支付情况。
对医疗保险提供者和服务数据进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。分析了2017年至2021年期间接受医疗保险支付的男性和女性神经放射科医生及其提供的服务。主要结果是性别代表性、从医疗保险获得的平均支付、提交的费用以及计费代码。采用t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验来确定男性和女性放射科医生在支付和工作量方面的差异。
2017年至2021年期间,共有2701名神经放射科医生,其中526名(19.5%)为女性,在学术性神经放射学实践中女性所占比例高于非学术性实践(分别为23.3%和15.6%)。平均而言,与男性同行相比,女性神经放射科医生收取的费用较低(均值,标准误[SE],642,489美元[14,756美元]对738,416美元[7800美元];P<.001),医疗保险支付也较少(均值[SE],92,834美元[1877美元]对113,495美元[1044美元];P<.001)。相比之下,女性神经放射科医生的每项服务支付比例更高(均值[SE],0.232[0.001]对0.208[0.0003];P<.001)。女性开具账单的总服务中位数较少(1802;四分位间距[IQR],925 - 4726)对2461(IQR,1268 - 5781);P<.001),服务的受益人数中位数较少(1232[IQR,705 - 1963]对1697[IQR,990 - 2682];P<.001),开具账单的唯一代码中位数较少(19[IQR,13 - 26]对23[IQR,17 - 33];P<.001)。对5年研究期间的数据进行时间分析表明,男性始终比女性获得更高的支付,尽管两个队列之间的平均医疗保险费用差异(P = .03)、平均医疗保险支付差异(P = .04)以及提供的服务中位数差异(P = .04)正在减小。
与男性同行相比,女性神经放射科医生的代表性不足,收取的费用较低,总体获得的支付较少。女性神经放射科医生提供的服务范围和数量较小,且更大比例的女性神经放射科医生为支付较高的服务开具账单。需要进一步研究以评估兼职工作和亚专业代表性方面的差异,以确定其影响。