• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性侵袭性椎体血管瘤的治疗:病灶内分块椎体切除术与改良整块椎体切除术的对比研究

Management of recurrent aggressive vertebral hemangiomas: a comparative study of piecemeal intralesional spondylectomy and modified total en bloc spondylectomy.

作者信息

Jiang Dongjie, Zhou Zihuan, Zhang Qi, He Shaohui, Sun Haitao, Cai Xiaopan, Liu Tielong, Yang Xinghai, Wei Haifeng, Xiao Jianru

机构信息

Spinal Tumor Center, Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.

Department of Orthopedic, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02942-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02942-5
PMID:40461997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of recurrent aggressive vertebral hemangiomas (AVHs) with neurological deficits poses a challenge due to their profuse vascularization and propensity for recurrence. The optimal approach to managing recurrence AVHs remains a topic of debate within the academic community.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of patients who experienced recurrent AVH in the thoracic and lumbar spine at our institution from August 2015 to July 2022. A total of 31 patients, underwent treatment with either piecemeal intralesional spondylectomy (PIS) or modified total en bloc spondylectomy (MTES). Clinical documentation and surgical outcomes, including pre- and postoperative neurological function assessed by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), surgical duration, blood loss, recurrence rate, and complications, were retrospectively presented and analyzed.

RESULTS

The study followed a cohort of 16 males and 15 females with recurrent AVHs in the thoracic or lumbar spine for a period ranging from 12 to 106 months. All patients presented with neurological deficits, with 20 patients undergoing PIS and 11 patients undergoing one-stage MTES. Both treatment modalities resulted in significant reductions in pain-NRS and ASIA scores. The MTES group experienced less intraoperative blood loss compared to the PIS group. During the follow-up period, four patients in the PIS group experienced recurrence. No serious complications or evidence of internal fixation failure were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified TES technique presents a comprehensive resection, less blood loss, lower incidence of recurrence, and effective tumor control for recurrent AVHs in thoracic and lumbar spine through post-only approach.

摘要

背景

复发性侵袭性椎体血管瘤(AVH)伴神经功能缺损的治疗具有挑战性,因为其血管丰富且易于复发。复发性AVH的最佳治疗方法仍是学术界争论的话题。

方法

对2015年8月至2022年7月在我院发生胸腰椎复发性AVH的一组患者进行回顾性分析。共有31例患者接受了病灶内碎块切除术(PIS)或改良整块椎体切除术(MTES)治疗。回顾性呈现并分析临床记录和手术结果,包括术前和术后通过美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)评分、数字评分量表(NRS)评估的神经功能、手术时间、失血量、复发率和并发症。

结果

该研究随访了16例男性和15例女性胸腰椎复发性AVH患者,随访时间为12至106个月。所有患者均有神经功能缺损,其中20例患者接受了PIS,11例患者接受了一期MTES。两种治疗方式均使疼痛NRS评分和ASIA评分显著降低。与PIS组相比,MTES组术中失血量更少。在随访期间,PIS组有4例患者复发。未观察到严重并发症或内固定失败的证据。

结论

改良TES技术通过后路单入路对胸腰椎复发性AVH进行全面切除,术中失血少,复发率低,肿瘤控制有效。

相似文献

1
Management of recurrent aggressive vertebral hemangiomas: a comparative study of piecemeal intralesional spondylectomy and modified total en bloc spondylectomy.复发性侵袭性椎体血管瘤的治疗:病灶内分块椎体切除术与改良整块椎体切除术的对比研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02942-5.
2
Surgical treatment of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas.侵袭性椎体血管瘤的外科治疗
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Aug;41(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.FOCUS16169.
3
Comparison of the prognostic factors of total en bloc spondylectomy and total piecemeal spondylectomy in patients with Enneking stage III giant cell tumor in the thoracic and lumbar spine.胸椎和腰椎Enneking III期骨巨细胞瘤患者全椎体整块切除术与全椎体分块切除术预后因素的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jan;32(1):254-260. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07455-w. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Surgical management of recurrent thoracolumbar spinal sarcoma with 4-level total en bloc spondylectomy: description of technique and report of two cases.4 级全脊椎整块切除术治疗复发性胸腰椎脊柱肉瘤:技术描述及 2 例报告。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1859-6. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Excision Surgery for Aggressive Vertebral Hemangiomas.侵袭性椎体血管瘤切除术的长期疗效
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:e474-e480. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.077. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
6
Multilevel en bloc spondylectomy for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine is challenging but rewarding.用于胸腰椎肿瘤的多级整块脊椎切除术具有挑战性,但也很有意义。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):858-67. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3578-x.
7
Surgical Management of Enneking Stage 3 Aggressive Vertebral Hemangiomas With Neurological Deficit by One-stage Posterior Total En Bloc Spondylectomy: A Review of 23 Cases.经单阶段后路全脊椎整块切除术治疗伴有神经功能缺损的恩氏 3 期侵袭性椎体血管瘤的手术治疗:23 例回顾性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):E67-E75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003192.
8
[Treatment of thoracolumbar tumors with total en bloc spondylectomy and the results of spinal stability reconstruction].全椎体整块切除术治疗胸腰椎肿瘤及脊柱稳定性重建结果
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;35(3):225-30. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2013.03.014.
9
Modified En Bloc Spondylectomy for Tumors of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine: Surgical Technique and Outcomes.改良整块脊椎切除术治疗胸腰椎肿瘤:手术技术与结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 6;99(17):1476-1484. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00141.
10
Total spondylectomy for Enneking stage III giant cell tumor of the mobile spine.全脊椎切除术治疗活动脊柱 Enneking 分期 III 期骨巨细胞瘤。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Dec;27(12):3084-3091. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5761-3. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical management of symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: a single institution experience and literature review.症状性椎体血管瘤的手术治疗:单中心经验及文献复习。
Spine J. 2023 Sep;23(9):1243-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
2
Surgical Management of Enneking Stage 3 Aggressive Vertebral Hemangiomas With Neurological Deficit by One-stage Posterior Total En Bloc Spondylectomy: A Review of 23 Cases.经单阶段后路全脊椎整块切除术治疗伴有神经功能缺损的恩氏 3 期侵袭性椎体血管瘤的手术治疗:23 例回顾性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):E67-E75. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003192.
3
Surgical Management and Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Neurological Deficits From Vertebral Hemangiomas: A Meta-Analysis.
神经功能缺损的椎体血管瘤患者的手术治疗及辅助治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):E99-E110. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003181.
4
Atypical Radiographic Features of Aggressive Vertebral Hemangiomas.侵袭性椎体血管瘤的非典型影像学特征。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jun 5;101(11):979-986. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00746.
5
A Novel Technique for Total En bloc Spondylectomy of the Fifth Lumbar Tumor Through Posterior-Only Approach.一种通过单一后入路行全脊椎整块切除术治疗第五腰椎肿瘤的新方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 15;44(12):896-901. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003003.
6
resection in the spine: a procedure of surgical oncology.脊柱切除术:外科肿瘤学的一种手术操作。
J Spine Surg. 2018 Sep;4(3):668-676. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.09.02.
7
The Role of Radiotherapy and Surgery in the Management of Aggressive Vertebral Hemangioma: A Retrospective Study of 20 Patients.放疗和手术在侵袭性椎体血管瘤治疗中的作用:20 例患者的回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Sep 27;24:6840-6850. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910439.
8
Long-term patient survival after the surgical treatment of bone and soft-tissue metastases from renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌骨和软组织转移患者的手术治疗后的长期生存。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Sep;100-B(9):1241-1248. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2017-1163.R3.
9
Intraoperative vertebroplasty during surgical decompression and instrumentation for aggressive vertebral hemangiomas: a retrospective study of 39 patients and review of the literature.手术减压和内固定术中椎体成形术治疗侵袭性椎体血管瘤:39 例回顾性研究及文献复习。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1128-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
10
En Bloc Resection Versus Intralesional Surgery in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine.整块切除术与腔内手术治疗脊柱巨细胞瘤的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Sep 15;42(18):1383-1390. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002094.