Silva Gleise M, Podversich Federico, Silva Aghata Elins M, Macias Franco Arturo, Gonella-Diaza Angela, Mateescu Raluca G, DiLorenzo Nicolas
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
Department of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna, FL 32446, USA.
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Apr 15;9:txaf051. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf051. eCollection 2025.
This study investigated the relationship between thermotolerance and residual feed intake (RFI) in crossbred replacement beef heifers. In the summer of 2019, vaginal body temperatures were recorded from 654 heifers to identify the most and the least heat-tolerant animals based on changes in body temperature throughout the day. From this group of heifers, 27 were ranked in the summer as either heat-tolerant (n = 14; thermotolerant) or least heat-tolerant (n = 13; non-thermotolerant) to enroll in a 42-d feed efficiency test conducted in the fall. The maximum body temperature minus the 0700 h body temperature difference between the groups was 0.19 °C for thermotolerant and 1.2 for non-thermotolerant heifers ( < 0.01). In the fall, selected heifers (398 ± 11.3 kg of body weight [BW]; approximately 720 d of age) were randomly allocated into four concrete-floored pens, each with two GrowSafe feed bunks, and fed a common ad libitum total mixed ration (16.9% crude protein, 52% total digestible nutrients on a DM basis) for a 56-d period (14 d of adaptation followed by 42 d of evaluation). Body weight was collected on d -1, 0, 14, 28, 41, and 42, while fall body temperature was recorded (10 min intervals for 4 consecutive d) from d 29 to 32 of the study, using temperature probes placed intravaginally with a hormone-free controlled internal drug release device. Final BW, average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI), DMI as a percentage of BW, RFI, and body temperature were analyzed as a completely randomized design. Final BW, ADG, DMI, and body temperature collected during the feeding period were not affected by thermotolerance phenotype ( ≥ 0.42); however, heifers previously classified as thermotolerant had decreased RFI ( = 0.01; -1.32 vs. 1.27 ± 3.31 kg, respectively) and DMI as a percentage of BW ( = 0.01) when compared with non-thermotolerant heifers. In conclusion, crossbred replacement beef heifers previously classified as thermotolerant based on multiple body temperature measurements collected throughout the summer had decreased RFI when measured in the fall, indicating the potential of feed efficiency in heat-tolerant beef heifers.
本研究调查了杂交后备肉用小母牛的耐热性与剩余采食量(RFI)之间的关系。2019年夏季,记录了654头小母牛的阴道体温,根据全天体温变化确定耐热性最强和最弱的动物。从这群小母牛中,选出27头在夏季被评为耐热(n = 14;耐热型)或最不耐热(n = 13;非耐热型)的小母牛,参加秋季进行的为期42天的饲料效率测试。耐热型小母牛的最高体温减去两组之间0700时体温的差值为0.19℃,非耐热型小母牛为1.2℃(P < 0.01)。秋季,将挑选出的小母牛(体重[BW]398±11.3 kg;约720日龄)随机分配到四个混凝土地面的围栏中,每个围栏有两个GrowSafe饲料槽,自由采食一种常见的全混合日粮(干物质基础上粗蛋白含量16.9%,总可消化养分含量52%),为期56天(14天适应期,随后42天评估期)。在第 -1、0、14、28、41和42天收集体重,在研究的第29至32天,使用放置在阴道内的温度探头和无激素控释内给药装置,每隔10分钟记录一次秋季体温。最终体重、平均日增重(ADG)、干物质采食量(DMI)、DMI占体重的百分比、RFI和体温采用完全随机设计进行分析。饲养期内收集的最终体重、ADG、DMI和体温不受耐热性表型的影响(P≥0.42);然而,与非耐热型小母牛相比,先前被归类为耐热型的小母牛RFI降低(P = 0.01;分别为 -1.32和1.27±3.31 kg),DMI占体重的百分比也降低(P = 0.01)。总之,根据整个夏季多次测量体温先前被归类为耐热型的杂交后备肉用小母牛,在秋季测量时RFI降低,这表明耐热型肉用小母牛具有饲料效率潜力。