Shadrin Ilya Y, Wendell David C, Alenezi Fawaz, Coles Sara A, Al-Khatib Sana M, Loring Zak, Piccini Jonathan P, Sun Albert Y, Hegland Donald D, Friedman Daniel J
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul;48(7):765-775. doi: 10.1111/pace.15211. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is increasingly used in patients with a ventricular pacing indication but necessitates precise septal localization. The resulting effects of intraoperative lead repositioning on septal fibrosis remain unknown.
To assess the safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in patients with LBBAP pacemakers and evaluate the septal myocardium via cMRI following LBBAP implantation compared with standard RV endocardial pacing (RVP).
Patients aged > 18 y.o. with bradycardia, LBBAP or RVP implant from 2021 to 2023, and at least one cMRI after implant were identified. LBBAP versus RVP was verified per established criteria. Delayed-enhancement cMRI and native T1 relaxation times were used to characterize myocardial scar.
A total of 34 patients were identified-20 with LBBAP implants (9 with matched pre-implant cMRI) and 14 with RVP implants (3 with matched pre-implant cMRI)-with no evidence of ventricular septal defects post-implant. LBBAP lead parameters were stable pre-/post-cMRI and out to 9 months. Comparing pre- versus post-implant cMRIs (median 579 days apart), 1/9 patients following LBBAP showed a new scar on the RV inferoseptal side directly adjacent to the pacing lead on post-implant cMRI, suggestive of potential implant-related scarring with LBBAP.
CMRI appears safe for patients with LBBAP pacemakers, with stable short- and long-term device parameters. In patients with matched pre/post-implant cMRIs, the new septal scar can be identified with LBBAP implantation, raising the possibility of lead-related fibrosis. Larger studies are required to substantiate whether the single case of lead-related fibrosis is an exception or occurs more frequently.
左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)在有心室起搏指征的患者中应用日益广泛,但需要精确的间隔定位。术中导线重新定位对间隔纤维化的最终影响尚不清楚。
评估心脏磁共振成像(cMRI)在植入LBBAP起搏器患者中的安全性,并通过cMRI评估LBBAP植入后与标准右心室心内膜起搏(RVP)相比的间隔心肌情况。
确定2021年至2023年年龄大于18岁、有心动过缓、植入LBBAP或RVP且植入后至少进行过一次cMRI的患者。根据既定标准对LBBAP与RVP进行验证。采用延迟强化cMRI和固有T1弛豫时间来表征心肌瘢痕。
共确定34例患者,其中20例植入LBBAP(9例有植入前匹配的cMRI),14例植入RVP(3例有植入前匹配的cMRI),植入后无室间隔缺损证据。LBBAP导线参数在cMRI前后及9个月内均稳定。比较植入前和植入后cMRI(中位间隔579天),1/9例LBBAP患者在植入后cMRI上显示右心室下间隔侧紧邻起搏导线处出现新瘢痕,提示LBBAP可能存在与植入相关的瘢痕形成。
cMRI对植入LBBAP起搏器的患者似乎是安全的,短期和长期设备参数稳定。在植入前和植入后有匹配cMRI的患者中,LBBAP植入后可发现新的间隔瘢痕,提示存在导线相关纤维化的可能性。需要更大规模的研究来证实与导线相关的纤维化这一单例是例外情况还是更频繁发生。