Ha Yejin, Luu Xuan Quy, Kim Woorim, Jun Jae Kwan, Suh Mina, Choi Kui Son
National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Fundamental Science, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Epidemiol Health. 2025;47:e2025031. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2025031. Epub 2025 May 30.
Breast cancer screening rates have increased since the introduction of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) in Korea. However, it remains unclear whether socioeconomic inequalities have improved, particularly according to screening type. This study investigated inequalities in organized (government-led) and opportunistic (individually initiated) screening, stratified by education and income levels.
Data were obtained from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, conducted annually from 2009 to 2021, involving approximately 1,700 women each year except in 2009. Trends were analyzed using joinpoint regression to calculate average annual percent changes (AAPCs). Socioeconomic inequalities were assessed using the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII).
Organized screening rates increased from 42.0% in 2009 to 60.2% in 2021 (AAPC, 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.4), whereas opportunistic screening rates declined from 13.3% to 11.2% (AAPC, -5.4; 95% CI, -8.7 to -2.3). For organized screening, individuals with lower education levels exhibited higher participation, resulting in negative inequality indices (SII, -5.37%; RII, 0.80). No significant income-based inequality was found (SII, 1.60%; RII, 1.07). However, opportunistic screening demonstrated significant inequalities by both education (SII, 5.37%; RII, 1.92) and income (SII, 5.90%; RII, 1.96), with higher participation rates among more advantaged groups.
The NCSP has improved breast cancer screening rates and reduced income-related inequality in organized screening. However, educational and income-based inequalities persist in opportunistic screening. To reduce screening inequities, policy efforts are needed to further promote the NCSP, including improving program quality and providing financial support for follow-up examinations.
自韩国实施国家癌症筛查计划(NCSP)以来,乳腺癌筛查率有所提高。然而,社会经济不平等是否得到改善仍不明确,尤其是根据筛查类型来看。本研究调查了按教育程度和收入水平分层的有组织(政府主导)筛查和机会性(个人发起)筛查中的不平等情况。
数据来自2009年至2021年每年进行的韩国国家癌症筛查调查,除2009年外,每年约有1700名女性参与。使用连接点回归分析趋势,以计算平均年度百分比变化(AAPC)。使用不平等斜率指数(SII)和不平等相对指数(RII)评估社会经济不平等。
有组织的筛查率从2009年的42.0%提高到2021年的60.2%(AAPC为1.9;95%置信区间[CI]为0.7至3.4),而机会性筛查率从13.3%下降到11.2%(AAPC为-5.4;95%CI为-8.7至-2.3)。对于有组织的筛查,教育水平较低的个体参与率较高,导致不平等指数为负(SII为-5.37%;RII为0.80)。未发现基于收入的显著不平等(SII为1.60%;RII为1.07)。然而,机会性筛查在教育(SII为5.37%;RII为1.92)和收入(SII为5.90%;RII为1.96)方面均显示出显著不平等,优势群体的参与率更高。
NCSP提高了乳腺癌筛查率,并减少了有组织筛查中与收入相关的不平等。然而,基于教育和收入的不平等在机会性筛查中仍然存在。为了减少筛查不平等,需要采取政策措施进一步推广NCSP,包括提高项目质量和为后续检查提供财政支持。