• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低社会经济群体的健康生活方式:专家观点

Healthy lifestyle in low-socioeconomic groups: expert views.

作者信息

Hoveling Liza A, Alma Manna A, Landsman-Dijkstra Jeanet A, Smidt Nynke, Reijneveld Sijmen A, Bültmann Ute, De Kroon Marlou L A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Health Sciences, Applied Health Research, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 May 21;13:1511317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511317. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511317
PMID:40469609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12133870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic position (SEP) increases the risk of health inequalities. Understanding how to realize lifestyle improvements in groups with low SEP may offer routes to reduce these inequalities, and information from professionals involved in this target can support this. Our aims were to gain insight into the professionals' perspectives on factors that influence the lifestyle of individuals with low SEP, and to identify promising approaches to reduce health inequalities.

METHODS

Focus group interviews and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 social workers (partially in training), health care and policy professionals. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed following thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the data: individual factors, accumulating problems, social context and societal factors; for the second aim a fifth theme emerged: involvement of individuals with low SEP. Participants also indicated a hierarchy in these themes. Addressing accumulating multi-faceted issues such as poverty is imperative before a more healthy lifestyle can be adopted and individuals can focus on skills needed to achieve a healthy lifestyle. Additionally, the social context (e.g., parents or neighbours) can play a supportive role in lifestyle change, supported by government and with active involvement of low SEP individuals.

CONCLUSION

According to the professionals, to help individuals with low SEP to realize a healthier lifestyle, poverty, knowledge and skills, and the involvement of a person's social context and society should be addressed.

摘要

背景

社会经济地位低下会增加健康不平等的风险。了解如何在社会经济地位低下的群体中实现生活方式的改善,可能会为减少这些不平等提供途径,而来自参与这一目标的专业人员的信息可以为此提供支持。我们的目的是深入了解专业人员对影响社会经济地位低下个体生活方式的因素的看法,并确定减少健康不平等的有效方法。

方法

对28名社会工作者(部分为培训中的人员)、医疗保健和政策专业人员进行了焦点小组访谈和半结构化访谈。所有访谈均进行了录音,逐字转录,并按照主题分析进行了分析。

结果

数据中出现了四个主题:个体因素、累积问题、社会背景和社会因素;为实现第二个目标,出现了第五个主题:社会经济地位低下个体的参与。参与者还指出了这些主题的层次结构。在采用更健康的生活方式以及个体能够专注于实现健康生活方式所需的技能之前,解决诸如贫困等多方面的累积问题至关重要。此外,社会背景(如父母或邻居)可以在生活方式改变中发挥支持作用,政府提供支持,社会经济地位低下的个体积极参与。

结论

专业人员认为,要帮助社会经济地位低下的个体实现更健康的生活方式,应解决贫困、知识和技能以及个人社会背景和社会的参与问题。

相似文献

1
Healthy lifestyle in low-socioeconomic groups: expert views.低社会经济群体的健康生活方式:专家观点
Front Public Health. 2025 May 21;13:1511317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511317. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring Public, Practitioner and Policymaker Perspectives of Unhealthy Lifestyle Factors in the Context of Socioeconomic Deprivation: A Qualitative Study.探究社会经济匮乏背景下公众、从业者和政策制定者对不良生活方式因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70069. doi: 10.1111/hex.70069.
3
Perceptions on healthy eating, physical activity and lifestyle advice: opportunities for adapting lifestyle interventions to individuals with low socioeconomic status.对健康饮食、体育活动及生活方式建议的认知:针对社会经济地位较低个体调整生活方式干预措施的机会。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 4;14:1036. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1036.
4
Middle-aged Australians' perceptions of support to reduce lifestyle risk factors: a qualitative study.中年澳大利亚人对减少生活方式风险因素的支持的看法:一项定性研究。
Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Aug;26(4):313-318. doi: 10.1071/PY20030.
5
Social inequality in lifestyle, motivation to change lifestyle and received health advice in individuals with diabetes: A nationwide study.社会不平等的生活方式、改变生活方式的动机和收到的健康建议在糖尿病患者中的个体差异:一项全国性研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Dec;48(8):847-854. doi: 10.1177/1403494819885727. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Identifying acceptable components for home-based health promotion services for older people with mild frailty: A qualitative study.确定轻度虚弱老年人居家健康促进服务的可接受组成部分:一项定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):393-403. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12526. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Tailoring lifestyle interventions to low socio-economic populations: a qualitative study.针对社会经济地位较低人群的生活方式干预措施的定制:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5877-8.
8
Impact and acceptability of lay health trainer-led lifestyle interventions delivered in primary care: a mixed method study.初级保健中由非专业健康培训师主导的生活方式干预措施的影响与可接受性:一项混合方法研究
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Jul;18(4):333-343. doi: 10.1017/S146342361700010X. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
9
Registered nurses' perceptions of healthy lifestyle counselling for immigrants in primary healthcare: A focus group study.注册护士对初级保健中移民健康生活方式咨询的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Oct;80(10):4196-4213. doi: 10.1111/jan.16069. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
10
Barriers and facilitators to adopting healthier lifestyle among low-income women in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.在沙特阿拉伯,低收入女性采用更健康生活方式的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1202-1212. doi: 10.1111/hex.13735. Epub 2023 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Upstream Policy Changes to Improve Population Health and Health Equity: A Priority Agenda.推动政策变革,改善人口健康和健康公平:优先议程。
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):20-35. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12640.
2
The Use of the Bolk Model for Positive Health and Living Environment in the Development of an Integrated Health Promotion Approach: A Case Study in a Socioeconomically Deprived Neighborhood in The Netherlands.博尔克模型在积极健康和生活环境方面的应用及其对综合健康促进方法的启示:荷兰一个社会经济贫困社区的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;19(4):2478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042478.
3
The effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and a nutrient profiling tax based on Nutri-Score on consumer food purchases in a virtual supermarket: a randomised controlled trial.含糖饮料税和基于 Nutri-Score 的营养成分评分税对虚拟超市消费者食品购买行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Apr;25(4):1105-1117. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004547. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Attitudes Toward Health, Healthcare, and eHealth of People With a Low Socioeconomic Status: A Community-Based Participatory Approach.社会经济地位低下人群对健康、医疗保健和电子健康的态度:基于社区的参与式方法。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jul 8;3:690182. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.690182. eCollection 2021.
5
Healthy eating strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a meta-ethnography.社会经济弱势群体的健康饮食策略:元民族志研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1942416. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1942416.
6
Understanding adolescent health risk behaviour and socioeconomic position: A grounded theory study of UK young adults.理解青少年健康风险行为和社会经济地位:英国青年成年人的扎根理论研究。
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Feb;43(2):528-544. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13240. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Healthy eating beliefs and the meaning of food in populations with a low socioeconomic position: A scoping review.健康饮食信念与社会经济地位较低人群的食物意义:范围综述。
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105135. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105135. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Why don't health care frontline professionals do more for segregated Roma? Exploring mechanisms supporting unequal care practices.为什么医疗保健一线专业人员不为被隔离的罗姆人做更多的事情?探索支持不平等护理实践的机制。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112739. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112739. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
9
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review.社会处方的实施途径有哪些?针对哪些人群?在什么情况下有效?一项实际情况综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):309-324. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12839. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
How does education lead to healthier behaviours? Testing the mediational roles of perceived control, health literacy and social support.教育如何导致更健康的行为?检验感知控制、健康素养和社会支持的中介作用。
Psychol Health. 2018 Nov;33(11):1416-1429. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1510932. Epub 2018 Nov 19.