Suppr超能文献

低社会经济群体的健康生活方式:专家观点

Healthy lifestyle in low-socioeconomic groups: expert views.

作者信息

Hoveling Liza A, Alma Manna A, Landsman-Dijkstra Jeanet A, Smidt Nynke, Reijneveld Sijmen A, Bültmann Ute, De Kroon Marlou L A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Department of Health Sciences, Applied Health Research, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 May 21;13:1511317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511317. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic position (SEP) increases the risk of health inequalities. Understanding how to realize lifestyle improvements in groups with low SEP may offer routes to reduce these inequalities, and information from professionals involved in this target can support this. Our aims were to gain insight into the professionals' perspectives on factors that influence the lifestyle of individuals with low SEP, and to identify promising approaches to reduce health inequalities.

METHODS

Focus group interviews and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 social workers (partially in training), health care and policy professionals. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed following thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from the data: individual factors, accumulating problems, social context and societal factors; for the second aim a fifth theme emerged: involvement of individuals with low SEP. Participants also indicated a hierarchy in these themes. Addressing accumulating multi-faceted issues such as poverty is imperative before a more healthy lifestyle can be adopted and individuals can focus on skills needed to achieve a healthy lifestyle. Additionally, the social context (e.g., parents or neighbours) can play a supportive role in lifestyle change, supported by government and with active involvement of low SEP individuals.

CONCLUSION

According to the professionals, to help individuals with low SEP to realize a healthier lifestyle, poverty, knowledge and skills, and the involvement of a person's social context and society should be addressed.

摘要

背景

社会经济地位低下会增加健康不平等的风险。了解如何在社会经济地位低下的群体中实现生活方式的改善,可能会为减少这些不平等提供途径,而来自参与这一目标的专业人员的信息可以为此提供支持。我们的目的是深入了解专业人员对影响社会经济地位低下个体生活方式的因素的看法,并确定减少健康不平等的有效方法。

方法

对28名社会工作者(部分为培训中的人员)、医疗保健和政策专业人员进行了焦点小组访谈和半结构化访谈。所有访谈均进行了录音,逐字转录,并按照主题分析进行了分析。

结果

数据中出现了四个主题:个体因素、累积问题、社会背景和社会因素;为实现第二个目标,出现了第五个主题:社会经济地位低下个体的参与。参与者还指出了这些主题的层次结构。在采用更健康的生活方式以及个体能够专注于实现健康生活方式所需的技能之前,解决诸如贫困等多方面的累积问题至关重要。此外,社会背景(如父母或邻居)可以在生活方式改变中发挥支持作用,政府提供支持,社会经济地位低下的个体积极参与。

结论

专业人员认为,要帮助社会经济地位低下的个体实现更健康的生活方式,应解决贫困、知识和技能以及个人社会背景和社会的参与问题。

相似文献

1
Healthy lifestyle in low-socioeconomic groups: expert views.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 21;13:1511317. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511317. eCollection 2025.
5
Social inequality in lifestyle, motivation to change lifestyle and received health advice in individuals with diabetes: A nationwide study.
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Dec;48(8):847-854. doi: 10.1177/1403494819885727. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Identifying acceptable components for home-based health promotion services for older people with mild frailty: A qualitative study.
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 May;26(3):393-403. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12526. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
7
Tailoring lifestyle interventions to low socio-economic populations: a qualitative study.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5877-8.
8
Impact and acceptability of lay health trainer-led lifestyle interventions delivered in primary care: a mixed method study.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Jul;18(4):333-343. doi: 10.1017/S146342361700010X. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Barriers and facilitators to adopting healthier lifestyle among low-income women in Saudi Arabia: A qualitative study.
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1202-1212. doi: 10.1111/hex.13735. Epub 2023 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Upstream Policy Changes to Improve Population Health and Health Equity: A Priority Agenda.
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):20-35. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12640.
4
Attitudes Toward Health, Healthcare, and eHealth of People With a Low Socioeconomic Status: A Community-Based Participatory Approach.
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jul 8;3:690182. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.690182. eCollection 2021.
5
Healthy eating strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a meta-ethnography.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1942416. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1942416.
6
Understanding adolescent health risk behaviour and socioeconomic position: A grounded theory study of UK young adults.
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Feb;43(2):528-544. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13240. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Healthy eating beliefs and the meaning of food in populations with a low socioeconomic position: A scoping review.
Appetite. 2021 Jun 1;161:105135. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105135. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Why don't health care frontline professionals do more for segregated Roma? Exploring mechanisms supporting unequal care practices.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112739. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112739. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
9
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review.
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):309-324. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12839. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
How does education lead to healthier behaviours? Testing the mediational roles of perceived control, health literacy and social support.
Psychol Health. 2018 Nov;33(11):1416-1429. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1510932. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验