• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在颈总动脉闭塞后使用7F Optimo球囊导引导管进行颈动脉支架置入术时,颈内动脉顺行血流的预测因素。

Predictors of Antegrade Flow in the Internal Carotid Artery During Carotid Artery Stenting with a 7F Optimo Balloon Guide Catheter Following Common Carotid Artery Occlusion.

作者信息

Harada Kei, Arakawa Kei, Kajihara Masahito

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Wajiro Hospital, 2-2-75, 811-0213, Wajirogaoka, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka-city, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4
PMID:40471305
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the 7F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) allows for smooth navigation and facilitates proximal flow control. However, this method may allow antegrade flow in the internal carotid artery (ICA). This study aims to identify predictors of antegrade flow during CAS with the common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 102 lesions treated with CAS using the 7F Optimo BGC and distal filter protection. The ICA flow pattern was assessed via contrast injection during CCA occlusion.

RESULTS

Antegrade flow in the ICA was observed in 22 lesions (22%). Compared with lesions where ICA flow control (stagnation or reverse flow) was achieved, the external carotid artery (ECA) diameter was significantly larger (4.4 ± 0.7 mm vs. 3.6 ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.001), and the minimum lesion diameter was significantly larger (3.2 ± 1.2 mm vs. 2.1 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.44-16.1; p = 0.01) and an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.08-9.09; p = 0.04) as independent predictors of antegrade flow. High-intensity spots in postoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and the incidence of ischemic events were not significantly different between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions with a minimum lesion diameter ≥ 2.1 mm or an ECA diameter ≥ 4.2 mm may exhibit antegrade ICA flow with BGC regardless of CCA occlusion, suggesting that an additional distal filter may help reduce embolic risk.

摘要

背景

使用7F Optimo球囊导引导管(BGC)进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)可实现顺畅的导管插入并有助于近端血流控制。然而,这种方法可能会使颈内动脉(ICA)出现顺行血流。本研究旨在确定在颈总动脉(CCA)闭塞的CAS过程中顺行血流的预测因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了102例使用7F Optimo BGC和远端滤器保护进行CAS治疗的病变。在CCA闭塞期间通过造影剂注射评估ICA血流模式。

结果

在22个病变(22%)中观察到ICA的顺行血流。与实现ICA血流控制(血流停滞或逆流)的病变相比,颈外动脉(ECA)直径明显更大(4.4±0.7mm对3.6±1.2mm,p<0.001),最小病变直径明显更大(3.2±1.2mm对2.1±1.0mm,p<0.001)。多变量分析确定最小病变直径≥2.1mm(OR 4.8,95%CI 1.44 - 16.1;p = 0.01)和ECA直径≥4.2mm(OR 3.2,95%CI 1.08 - 9.09;p = 0.04)是顺行血流的独立预测因素。两组术后扩散加权磁共振成像中的高强度斑点和缺血事件的发生率没有显著差异。

结论

最小病变直径≥2.1mm或ECA直径≥4.2mm的病变,无论CCA是否闭塞,使用BGC时都可能出现ICA顺行血流,这表明额外的远端滤器可能有助于降低栓塞风险。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Antegrade Flow in the Internal Carotid Artery During Carotid Artery Stenting with a 7F Optimo Balloon Guide Catheter Following Common Carotid Artery Occlusion.在颈总动脉闭塞后使用7F Optimo球囊导引导管进行颈动脉支架置入术时,颈内动脉顺行血流的预测因素。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00062-025-01525-4.
2
Carotid artery stenting using a 7 French Optimo balloon guide catheter combined with a distal filter.使用7法国Optimo球囊导引导管联合远端滤器进行颈动脉支架置入术。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun;31(3):339-343. doi: 10.1177/15910199231162493. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Predictors of antegrade flow at internal carotid artery during carotid artery stenting with proximal protection.近端保护下颈动脉支架置入术中颈内动脉顺行血流的预测因素
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jun;160(6):1121-1127. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3487-y. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
4
Outcome of CAS under flow reversal and analysis for the intraprocedural flow of internal carotid artery.在血流反转下的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果及颈内动脉术中血流分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;244:108443. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108443. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Hemodynamic conditions at the carotid bifurcation during protective common carotid occlusion.在颈总动脉保护性闭塞期间颈动脉分叉处的血流动力学状况。
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Oct;34(4):577-80. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.119041.
6
Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Artery Stent Placement: A Benchtop Assessment of Flow Reversal Performance.用于颈动脉支架置入的近端保护装置:血流逆转性能的体外评估
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Aug 1;46(8):1603-1608. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8664.
7
Efficacy of a proximal occlusion catheter with reversal of flow in the prevention of embolic events during carotid artery stenting: an experimental analysis.一种具有血流逆转功能的近端闭塞导管在预防颈动脉支架置入术中栓塞事件的疗效:一项实验分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Mar;33(3):504-9. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.112278.
8
Anatomical navigational difficulties in transradial right carotid artery stenting with 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter.使用7-F Optimo球囊导引导管经桡动脉行右侧颈动脉支架置入术时的解剖导航困难
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 27:15910199241276906. doi: 10.1177/15910199241276906.
9
Carotid angioplasty with internal carotid artery flow reversal is well tolerated in the awake patient.清醒患者对伴有颈内动脉血流逆转的颈动脉血管成形术耐受性良好。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jul;40(1):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.034.
10
Stent Placement for Severe Stenosis of the Left Common Carotid Artery with Internal-to-External Carotid Steal.左颈总动脉严重狭窄伴颈内-颈外动脉盗血的支架置入术
Interv Neurol. 2015 Jan;3(1):22-6. doi: 10.1159/000367717.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome of CAS under flow reversal and analysis for the intraprocedural flow of internal carotid artery.在血流反转下的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果及颈内动脉术中血流分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Sep;244:108443. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108443. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
2
Carotid artery revascularization using the Walrus balloon guide catheter: safety and feasibility from a US multicenter experience.使用 Walrus 球囊导引导管进行颈动脉血运重建:来自美国多中心经验的安全性和可行性。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):709-717. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018126. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
Common carotid artery endovascular clamping for neuroprotection during carotid stenting: Flow-gate system as an innovative treatment approach.
颈总动脉血管腔内夹闭在颈动脉支架置入术中的神经保护作用:血流门控系统作为一种创新的治疗方法。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 1;97(1):E71-E78. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29287. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
The role of transfemoral carotid artery stenting with proximal balloon occlusion embolic protection in the contemporary endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术联合近端球囊阻断栓塞保护在当代颈动脉狭窄血管内治疗中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;72(5):1701-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
5
Angiographic Patterns and Outcomes Achieved by Proximal Balloon Occlusion in Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Stenting.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术中近端球囊闭塞的血管造影模式及结果
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;30(2):363-372. doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00770-8. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
Predictors of antegrade flow at internal carotid artery during carotid artery stenting with proximal protection.近端保护下颈动脉支架置入术中颈内动脉顺行血流的预测因素
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jun;160(6):1121-1127. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3487-y. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
7
The Use of Embolic Protection Devices Is Associated With a Lower Stroke and Death Rate After Carotid Stenting.使用栓塞保护装置与颈动脉支架置入术后较低的卒中和死亡率相关。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1257-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.032.
8
Proximal balloon occlusion versus distal filter protection in carotid artery stenting: A meta-analysis and review of the literature.颈动脉支架置入术中近端球囊阻断术与远端滤网保护术的比较:一项荟萃分析及文献综述
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;89(5):923-931. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26842. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
9
Proximal occlusion versus distal filter for cerebral protection during carotid stenting: updated meta-analysis of randomised and observational MRI studies.近端闭塞与远端滤器在颈动脉支架置入术中的脑保护作用:随机和观察性 MRI 研究的更新荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2015 Jun;11(2):238-46. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M03_01.
10
Cerebral embolic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging following carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion.颈动脉支架置入术后应用弥散加权磁共振成像检测到的脑栓塞病灶:8 项比较滤网式脑保护与近端球囊阻断的研究的荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct;7(10):1177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.019. Epub 2014 Sep 17.