Abe Hiroshi, Ozaki Dai, Tokano Takashi, Minamino Tohru
Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan.
Egypt Heart J. 2025 Jun 5;77(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s43044-025-00656-w.
Eccentric calcified lesions pose significant challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as they are associated with an increased risk of coronary artery perforation and suboptimal stent expansion. Moreover, long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents (DESs) in these lesions are less favorable. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a treatment option for calcified lesions. However, its efficacy in managing eccentric calcified lesions remains uncertain.
A 70-year-old male presented with angina starting a week ago. He was diagnosed with unstable angina, and a coronary computed tomography showed severe stenosis with calcified plaque in the right coronary artery. The coronary angiography confirmed severe, calcified, eccentric stenosis in the right coronary artery. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) showed an eccentric lesion with calcified plaque, and the diameter of the vessels before and after the lesion was about 6.2 mm on average. Due to the high risk of vessel perforation associated with rotablator and orbital atherectomy systems, intravascular lithotripsy was performed using a 3 mm balloon. The crack formation was observed on IVUS. IVUS image shows both the guidewire and IVUS catheter being partially embedded within the concavity of the calcified nodule, and a 4 mm balloon was used for low-pressure expansion to expand the calcified crackles. This allowed the wire to sink into the calcified plaque and enabled balloon expansion within the calcified region. The risk of coronary perforation was deemed reduced, and a 5 mm × 15 mm DES was successfully placed without complication.
The additional balloon dilation following IVL could allow the wire to enter the eccentric calcified plaque, enhancing procedural safety and effectiveness. Depending on how cracks form within the plaque, this approach may facilitate safer and more effective treatment of eccentric calcified lesions.
偏心钙化病变在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中带来重大挑战,因为它们与冠状动脉穿孔风险增加及支架扩张不理想相关。此外,药物洗脱支架(DES)在这些病变中的长期预后较差。血管内碎石术(IVL)已成为钙化病变的一种治疗选择。然而,其在处理偏心钙化病变方面的疗效仍不确定。
一名70岁男性一周前开始出现心绞痛。他被诊断为不稳定型心绞痛,冠状动脉计算机断层扫描显示右冠状动脉严重狭窄并伴有钙化斑块。冠状动脉造影证实右冠状动脉存在严重、钙化、偏心狭窄。血管内超声(IVUS)显示为偏心病变伴钙化斑块,病变前后血管直径平均约为6.2毫米。由于旋磨术和轨道斑块旋切系统相关的血管穿孔风险高,使用3毫米球囊进行血管内碎石术。在IVUS上观察到裂纹形成。IVUS图像显示导丝和IVUS导管部分嵌入钙化结节的凹面内,使用4毫米球囊进行低压扩张以扩展钙化裂纹。这使得导丝能够沉入钙化斑块中,并使球囊在钙化区域内扩张。冠状动脉穿孔风险被认为降低,成功植入一枚5毫米×15毫米的DES且无并发症。
IVL后额外的球囊扩张可使导丝进入偏心钙化斑块,提高手术安全性和有效性。根据斑块内裂纹形成的方式,这种方法可能有助于更安全、有效地治疗偏心钙化病变。