• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续气道正压通气与常规护理治疗妊娠合并阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的两步预试验

Continuous positive airway pressure versus usual care for obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: a two-step pilot trial.

作者信息

Nugent Rachael, de Costa Caroline, Callaway Leonie, Erigadoo Shiv, Gilbertson Elise, Brown Chris, Perry-Keene Joanna, Shakhovskoy Rebekah, Kearney Lauren

机构信息

Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, QLD, 4575, Australia.

University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jun 5;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01645-1.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-025-01645-1
PMID:40474294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12139340/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) and affects up to 15% of pregnant women. OSA in pregnancy can be associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may be an effective treatment for OSA during pregnancy.

AIM

To examine the feasibility and acceptability of screening women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m for OSA in pregnancy, followed by randomisation to treatment with CPAP or no CPAP for women diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA.

METHODS

This study was a single-centre, two-stage pilot study. Firstly, all consenting participants were screened for OSA and then, only if diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15), randomised to CPAP or no CPAP. The feasibility of the OSA screening was determined by recruitment rates. A priori criteria of > 20% recruitment to the sleep study were considered feasible. The acceptability of the sleep study was examined using the completion rate and reasons for withdrawal prior to the sleep study. The acceptability of CPAP randomisation was assessed by completion rates for women randomised, adherence to CPAP, reasons for withdrawal, and the review of quality-of-life measures over the course of pregnancy.

RESULTS

Ninety-six women with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m before 26 completed weeks of pregnancy were invited to participate from the Sunshine Coast University Hospital and Health Service. Overall, 36 women enrolled, giving a recruitment rate of 37%. A total of 75% (n = 26) of recruited women completed OSA screening (clinical history, questionnaires, and formal sleep study). Subsequently, six (6%) of invited women had an apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h and were diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA and underwent randomisation to receive treatment with CPAP (n = 4) or no CPAP (n = 1) until birth. One woman withdrew after randomisation to treatment. Nine women withdrew prior to full completion of OSA screening and one following an inconclusive sleep study. Women who had a sleep study found it acceptable, and in women randomised to CPAP, adherence averaged 4.86 h/night. Quality-of-life measures were similar when measured over two time points in pregnancy.

DISCUSSION

A definitive trial screening women for OSA and subsequent randomisation to treatment or no treatment may be feasible. Future trials should be resourced to expand inclusion criteria, improve accessibility for participants, evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness, and investigate partial treatment effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN, ACTRN12621001523897. Registered 9 September 2021 - retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Update/Step8_Update.aspx?id=382640.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2540/12139340/cc6edd4c9137/40814_2025_1645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2540/12139340/cc6edd4c9137/40814_2025_1645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2540/12139340/cc6edd4c9137/40814_2025_1645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与体重指数(BMI)增加相关,影响高达15%的孕妇。妊娠期OSA可能与不良母婴结局有关。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)可能是妊娠期OSA的有效治疗方法。

目的

研究对孕期BMI≥35kg/m²的女性进行OSA筛查的可行性和可接受性,随后将被诊断为中度至重度OSA的女性随机分为接受CPAP治疗组或不接受CPAP治疗组。

方法

本研究是一项单中心、两阶段的试点研究。首先,对所有同意参与的参与者进行OSA筛查,然后,只有被诊断为中度至重度OSA(呼吸暂停低通气指数[AHI]≥15)的参与者才被随机分为接受CPAP治疗组或不接受CPAP治疗组。OSA筛查的可行性由招募率决定。预先设定的招募率>20%参与睡眠研究被认为是可行的。使用完成率和睡眠研究前退出的原因来检查睡眠研究的可接受性。通过随机分组女性的完成率、对CPAP的依从性、退出原因以及孕期生活质量测量指标的回顾来评估CPAP随机分组的可接受性。

结果

邀请了阳光海岸大学医院和卫生服务中心的96名妊娠26周前BMI≥35kg/m²的女性参与研究。总体而言,36名女性登记参与,招募率为37%。共有75%(n = 26)登记参与的女性完成了OSA筛查(临床病史、问卷调查和正式睡眠研究)。随后,6名(6%)受邀女性的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥15/h,被诊断为中度至重度OSA,并随机分为接受CPAP治疗(n = 4)或不接受CPAP治疗(n = 1)直至分娩。一名女性在随机分组接受治疗后退出。9名女性在OSA筛查完全完成前退出,一名女性在睡眠研究结果不明确后退出。进行睡眠研究的女性认为该研究是可接受的,在随机分组接受CPAP治疗的女性中,平均每晚依从时间为4.86小时。在孕期的两个时间点测量时,生活质量测量指标相似。

讨论

对女性进行OSA筛查并随后随机分为接受治疗或不接受治疗的确定性试验可能是可行的。未来的试验应获得资源以扩大纳入标准、提高参与者的可及性、评估临床和成本效益,并研究部分治疗效果。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,ACTRN12621001523897。2021年9月9日注册——追溯注册,https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Update/Step8_Update.aspx?id=382640。

相似文献

1
Continuous positive airway pressure versus usual care for obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: a two-step pilot trial.持续气道正压通气与常规护理治疗妊娠合并阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的两步预试验
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jun 5;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01645-1.
2
Pressure modification or humidification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea.压力调节或湿化以改善阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停成人患者持续气道正压通气机的使用情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 2;12(12):CD003531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003531.pub4.
3
Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or Positional Therapy Compared to Control for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy: Protocol for Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.持续气道正压通气或体位疗法与对照相比治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停对妊娠期糖尿病发生发展的影响:可行性随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 11;14:e51434. doi: 10.2196/51434.
4
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure plus Mandibular Advancement Therapy (PAPMAT): study protocol for an adaptive randomised crossover trial comparing the benefits and costs of combining two established treatments for obstructive sleep apnoea.持续气道正压通气联合下颌前伸疗法(PAPMAT):一项比较两种已确立的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停治疗方法联合应用的获益和成本的适应性随机交叉试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Jul 24;24(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07484-w.
5
Mandibular advancement device vs. CPAP in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: are they equally effective in Short term health outcomes?下颌前移装置与 CPAP 治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:在短期健康结局方面它们同样有效吗?
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Sep 15;9(9):971-2. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3008.
6
Educational, supportive and behavioural interventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea.旨在提高阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停成年患者持续气道正压通气机使用情况的教育、支持和行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 8(1):CD007736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007736.pub2.
7
[Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in women].[女性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断与治疗专家共识]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 12;47(6):509-528. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20240206-00072.
8
The effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: A systematic review.持续气道正压通气治疗妊娠期阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的疗效:系统评价。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jun;63(3):290-300. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13654. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
9
Effects of opioid, hypnotic and sedating medications on sleep-disordered breathing in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea.阿片类、催眠和镇静药物对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停成年患者睡眠呼吸障碍的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14(7):CD011090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011090.pub2.
10
Polysomnography in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: an evidence-based analysis.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的多导睡眠图:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(13):1-38. Epub 2006 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating discrepancies in findings between rigorous randomized trials and meta-analyses evaluating pregnancy interventions to limit gestational weight gain.探讨严格的随机对照试验与评估限制妊娠体重增加的妊娠干预措施的荟萃分析在研究结果上的差异。
Obes Rev. 2024 Dec;25(12):e13826. doi: 10.1111/obr.13826. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Partnering with consumers and practising clinicians to establish research priorities for public hospital maternity services.与消费者和执业临床医生合作,为公立医院产科服务确定研究重点。
Aust Health Rev. 2024 Jun;48(3):321-331. doi: 10.1071/AH23222.
3
Breastfeeding and infant care as 'sexed' care work: reconsideration of the three Rs to enable women's rights, economic empowerment, nutrition and health.
母乳喂养和婴儿护理作为“性别化”的护理工作:重新考虑“三 R”以实现妇女权利、经济赋权、营养和健康。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 11;11:1181229. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1181229. eCollection 2023.
4
Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in high risk pregnancy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.高危妊娠中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的治疗:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Respir Res. 2023 Jun 27;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02445-y.
5
Empirical progression criteria thresholds for feasibility outcomes in HIV clinical trials: a methodological study.HIV临床试验中可行性结果的经验性进展标准阈值:一项方法学研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jun 14;9(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01342-x.
6
The effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure for treating obstructive sleep apnoea in pregnancy: A systematic review.持续气道正压通气治疗妊娠期阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的疗效:系统评价。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jun;63(3):290-300. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13654. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
7
Obesity in Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Influential Guidelines.孕期肥胖:对有影响力指南的全面综述
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2023 Jan;78(1):50-68. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001091.
8
Continuous positive airway pressure treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and hypertensive complications in high-risk pregnancy.持续气道正压通气治疗高危妊娠阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停及高血压并发症。
Sleep Breath. 2023 May;27(2):621-629. doi: 10.1007/s11325-022-02669-0. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
9
"Never let a good crisis go to waste": Positives from disrupted maternity care in Australia during COVID-19.“不要浪费一场好危机”:澳大利亚在 COVID-19 期间中断的产妇护理中发现的积极因素。
Midwifery. 2022 Jul;110:103340. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103340. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
10
Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997-2020).随机对照试验中参与者的招募、同意和保留:对国家卫生研究院(NIHR)期刊库中(1997-2020 年)发表的试验的综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):e059230. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059230.