Unsworth Nash, Robison Matthew K, Miller Ashley L
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jul;150(7):1303-1331. doi: 10.1037/xge0000998. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
Individual differences in lapses of attention were examined in the present study. Participants performed various attention control, working memory, and reaction time (RT) tasks to assess lapses of attention. Task-unrelated thoughts, task-specific motivation, alertness, and trait factors were also assessed. Behavioral indicators of lapses of attention correlated and loaded on the same general lapse of attention factor. The lapse of attention factor correlated with, but was distinct from, attention control and task-unrelated thoughts factors. The lapses of attention factor further related to working memory capacity, speed of processing, motivation, alertness, boredom proneness, and self-reports of everyday cognitive failures. Structural equation modeling suggested that attention control, task-unrelated thoughts, variance shared across task unrelated thoughts, motivation, and alertness, and boredom proneness all accounted for unique variance in lapses of attention. These results provide important evidence for the general tendency to experience lapses of attention in a variety of tasks and situations and further suggest that multiple factors contribute to variation in lapses of attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究考察了注意力失误方面的个体差异。参与者执行了各种注意力控制、工作记忆和反应时间(RT)任务,以评估注意力失误情况。还评估了与任务无关的想法、特定任务动机、警觉性和特质因素。注意力失误的行为指标相互关联,并加载到同一个一般注意力失误因素上。注意力失误因素与注意力控制和与任务无关的想法因素相关,但又有所不同。注意力失误因素还与工作记忆容量、处理速度、动机、警觉性、无聊倾向以及日常认知失误的自我报告有关。结构方程模型表明,注意力控制、与任务无关的想法、任务无关想法之间共享的方差、动机、警觉性和无聊倾向都解释了注意力失误中独特的方差。这些结果为在各种任务和情境中出现注意力失误的一般倾向提供了重要证据,并进一步表明多种因素导致了注意力失误的差异。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)