Manickam Dominic Savio Yogesh, Ravichandran Devi Krishna, Surathkumaar Hariharan, Vinjmur Ragavan Yashvanthan, Santharam Priya, Bhandari Ashni, Prasanth Krishna
Community Medicine, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
General Practice, Kauvery Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2025 May 6;17(5):e83584. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83584. eCollection 2025 May.
Introduction Inefficient biomedical waste (BMW) management in healthcare settings can expose patients, workers, and the environment to significant risks. This study aimed to assess BMW segregation practices, occupational risk perception, training exposure, and sharps injury incidence among healthcare workers (HCWs) across multiple tertiary care hospitals in South India. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted over six months across four randomly selected tertiary care teaching hospitals in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. A total of 356 healthcare workers comprising 84 (23.6%) doctors, 186 (52.2%) nurses, and 86 (24.2%) housekeeping staff were selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected via a pre-validated, structured questionnaire (55 items), on-site observations, and semi-structured interviews. Risk perception was measured using a five-point Likert scale, and a simplified infection risk model adapted from the UK Environmental Agency was applied. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), employing chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA. Results Overall, 257 (72.1%) of participants demonstrated correct knowledge of BMW segregation protocols, with highest accuracy among nurses (142, 76.3%) and lowest among doctors (53, 63%). Field observations revealed inconsistent compliance, particularly in high-volume areas. Risk perception was highest for environmental contamination (mean score: 4.30) and waste worker exposure (4.08), but significantly lower for patients and visitors. A total of 41 sharps injuries were reported, with underreporting observed among doctors. Training participation varied significantly across roles: only 26 (31%) doctors were trained compared to 138 (74.2%) nurses and 76 (88.3%) housekeeping staff. Training was strongly associated with both risk perception and segregation accuracy (p < 0.05). Conclusion This multi-center study highlights critical gaps in BMW knowledge, risk perception, and training, particularly among doctors. Despite awareness, compliance remains inconsistent, underscoring the need for mandatory training, improved monitoring, and institution-wide reinforcement of biomedical waste protocols to reduce health and environmental hazards.
引言 在医疗机构中,生物医学废物(BMW)管理效率低下会使患者、工作人员和环境面临重大风险。本研究旨在评估印度南部多家三级护理医院医护人员(HCW)的BMW分类实践、职业风险认知、培训情况以及锐器伤发生率。方法 在泰米尔纳德邦金奈市随机选择的四家三级护理教学医院进行了为期六个月的横断面观察性研究。采用分层随机抽样法,共选取了356名医护人员,其中包括84名(23.6%)医生、186名(52.2%)护士和86名(24.2%)保洁人员。通过预先验证的结构化问卷(55项)、现场观察和半结构化访谈收集数据。使用五点李克特量表测量风险认知,并应用了一个改编自英国环境署的简化感染风险模型。使用SPSS 26.0版(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行数据分析,采用卡方检验和单因素方差分析。结果 总体而言,257名(72.1%)参与者对BMW分类规程有正确的认识,护士中的准确率最高(142名,76.3%),医生中的准确率最低(53名,63%)。现场观察发现合规情况不一致,特别是在高流量区域。对环境污染的风险认知最高(平均得分:4.30),对废物处理工作人员接触的风险认知(4.08)次之,但对患者和访客的风险认知明显较低。共报告了41起锐器伤事件,发现医生存在漏报情况。不同角色的培训参与情况差异显著:只有26名(31%)医生接受了培训,而护士有138名(74.2%),保洁人员有76名(88.3%)。培训与风险认知和分类准确性均密切相关(p < 0.05)。结论 这项多中心研究突出了在BMW知识、风险认知和培训方面的关键差距,尤其是在医生中。尽管有一定认识,但合规情况仍然不一致,这凸显了强制培训、加强监测以及在全机构强化生物医学废物规程以减少健康和环境危害的必要性。